Abstract
Happiness can be treated either as ephemeral, unstable. unresearchable or as something inherent of given ways of life, dispositions towards life. Here, the latter position is taken, and happiness is seen in the context of the whole life situation. Also, happiness is taken to be socially determined and ruled by social norms: the concept of happiness barrier is proposed, i.e. a situation where people present themselves as happy and need to develop stategies for this purpose.
Three case studies are presented where the various aspects of the conception of happiness are highlighted. In the first case study, a “natural” disposition towards happiness is present, in the two others, various versions of modern socially determined happiness norms are present.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Barker, Theo: 1978, The Long March of Everyman 1790–1960, Penguin Books.
Elias, Norbert: 1978, Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Erster Band. Suhrkamp, Ulm.
Elias, Norbert: 1979, Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Zweiter Band. Suhrkamp, Baden-Baden.
Ottomeyer, Klaus: 1974, Soziales Verhalten und Ökonomie im Kapitalismus, Politladen Erlangen, Gaiganz.
Roos, J. P.: 1978, ‘Subjective and objective welfare. A critique of Erik Allardt’, Research Group on Comparative Sociology, Research Reports 18.
Sennett, Richard: 1977, The Fall of Public Man, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sennett, Richard and Cobb, Jonathan: 1977, The Hidden Injuries of Class, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Terkel, Studs: 1975, Working, Wildwood House, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roos, J.P. Behind the happiness barrier. Soc Indic Res 20, 141–163 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302459
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302459