Skip to main content
Log in

Lumbar muscularity and its relationship with age, occupation and low back pain

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper considers an internal standard of lumbar muscularity. The cross-sectional areas (A cs) of the intervertebral disc and paraspinal muscles were measured in 147 working men from an axial magnetic resonance image passing through the L3-4 disc. Lumbar muscularity was expressed by two ratios; the ratio between the A cs of the right psoas and the A cs of the intervertebral disc (P:disc), and the ratio between the combined A cs values of the right erector spinae and quadratus lumborum and the A cs of the disc (ESQL:disc). When the subjects were divided into two age groups (76 aged 20–30 years and 71 aged 31–58 years) lumbar muscularity was found to be significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the younger age group (P:disc=0.8, SD 0.2; ESQL:disc=2.0, SD 0.3) than in the older age group (P:disc =0.7, SD 0.2; ESQL:disc=1.8, SD 0.3). Lumbar muscularity was not significantly affected by occupation or by a history of low back pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cooper RG, Mitchell WS, Jayson MIV (1989) Anthropometric assessment of paraspinal muscles in patients suffering low back pain (CBP). Br J Rheumatol [Suppl] 2:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies JE, Gibson T, Tester L (1979) The value of exercise in the treatment of low back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil 18:243–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasue M, Fujiwara M, Kikuchi S (1980) A new method of quantitative measurement of abdominal and back muscle strength. Spine 5:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikai M, Fukunaga T (1970) A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 26:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall PH, Jenkins JM (1968) Lumbar isometric flexion exercises. Physiotherapy 54:158–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1984) Muscle strength and CSA in man: a comparison of strength-trained and untrained subjects. Br J Sports Med 18:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer T, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 14:33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Millerchip R (1988) Magnetic resonance anthropometry of muscles stabilising the lumbar spine. B Sc thesis, University of Liverpool

  • Millerchip R, Savage RA, Edwards RHT (1988) Magnetic resonance anthropometry of muscles stabilising the lumbar spine. Clin Sci 75 [Suppl 19]:39P

  • Reid JG, Costigan PA (1985) Geometry of adult rectus abdominis and erector spinae muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 6:278–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes M, Young A (1984) The contribution of reflex inhibition to arthrogenous muscle weakness. Clin Sci 67:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey RL, Clements RL (1987) Conservative treatment of back pain. In: Jayson MIV (ed) The lumbar spine and back pain. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 299–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Videman T, Nurminen M, Troup JDG (1990) Lumbar spinal pathology in cadaveric material in relation to history of back pain, occupation, and physical loading. Spine 15:728–740

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savage, R.A., Millerchip, R., Whitehouse, G.H. et al. Lumbar muscularity and its relationship with age, occupation and low back pain. Eur J Appl Physiol 63, 265–268 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233859

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233859

Key words

Navigation