Skip to main content
Log in

Postural maintenance during fast forward bending: a model simulation experiment determines the “reduced trajectory”

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A recent article by Crenna et al. (1987) has shown that fast, forward bending movements are accompanied by a backwards motion of the hips and lower limbs. The ongoing research presented in this brief note expands upon the experimental data described by Crenna and colleagues, concerning the postural activities associated with rapid forward bending in standing man. Our primary experimental tool is the computer simulation method, with the standing subject being represented by a double-joint system: the trunk is modeled as a rigid link mechanically coupled (via a “hip” joint) to the lower body link fixed to the ground (via an “ankle” joint). Each of the two joints in this system is independently controlled by a neurological control model for single joint movements, consisting of an idealized pair of antagonistic muscles (flexor and extensor), their common load, and proprioception from the muscle spindles. This model thereby integrates descending commands with proprioceptive feedback in controlling the joint movements. Our early simulation experiments determine a “reduced trajectory”, that is, the physical perturbation to the postural system, due to the voluntary movement, in the absence of any stabilizing activities. These simulation experiments clearly show that an important component of the backward movements in the hips and lower limbs during forward bending is indeed due to the mechanical (physical) coupling between the upper and lower body segments and thus not solely a consequence of the anticipatory postural muscle activity. Simulations also predict that any postural activities in the hips and lower limbs should be a two-fold process: first, some preprogrammed, descending control to the lower body would be required to actively enhance the passive, backwards motion (this is consistent with, though not strictly identical to, the hypothesis of Crenna and colleagues); secondly, there must be a subsequent activation in the anterior muscles of the lower body in order to arrest this backwards motion, since otherwise the uncountered momentum would carry the body backward to the floor in less than half a second after the upper body movement has terminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brenière Y, Do MC, Bouisset S (1987) Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking? J Motor Behav 19: 62–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenna P, Frigo C, Massion J, Pedotti A (1987) Forward and backward axial synergies in man. Exp Brain Res 65: 538–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenna P, Frigo C, Massion J, Pedotti A, Deat A (1988) Forward and backward axial movements: two modes of central control. In:VS, Gurfinkel ME, Ioffe J, Massion J eds.. Roll Stance and motion. Plenum Press, New York, pp 195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford B, Stark L (1985) Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal. Exp Neurol 90: 619–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford B, Kim WS, Lee SH, Stark L (1986) Neurological control of head movements: inverse modeling and electromyographic evidence. Math Biosci 78: 159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos CF (1989) Mathematical modeling and computer simulations of the reflex control of voluntary movements. PhD thesis. Department of Biophysics, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos CF, Hacisalihzade SS, Stark LW (1990) Behavior space of a stretch reflex model and its implications for the neural control of voluntary movements. Med Biol Eng Comp 28: 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos CF, Stark LW (1987) Simulation studies of descending and reflex control of fast movements. J Motor Behav 19: 38–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos CF, Stark, LW (1988) Modeling the neurological control of human movements. J Motor Behav 20: 462–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos CF, Stark LW (1990a) Postural maintenance during movement: simulations of a two joint model. Biol Cybern (in press)

  • Ramos CF, Stark L W (1990b) Simulation experiments can shed light on the postural adjustments related to voluntary movements. In: Winters, Woo (eds) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark LW (1968) Neurological control systems. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zattara M, Bouisset S (1988) Posturo-kinetic organization during the early phase of voluntary upper limb movement. 1. Normal subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51: 956–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky V, Selayanov V (1983) The mass and inertia characteristics of the main segments of the human body. In:Matsui H, Kobayashi K (eds) Biomechanics VIII-B. International series on biomechanics 4B. Proceed Eighth Intern Congr of Biomechanics, Nagoya / Japan. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramos, C.F., Stark, L.W. Postural maintenance during fast forward bending: a model simulation experiment determines the “reduced trajectory”. Exp Brain Res 82, 651–657 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228807

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228807

Key words

Navigation