Skip to main content
Log in

Buprenorphine and naloxone alone and in combination in opioid-dependent humans

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjective, physiological and behavioral effects of subcutaneously administered hydromorphone (6 mg), naloxone (0.2 mg), buprenorphine (0.2 and 0.3 mg), and two buprenorphine-naloxone combinations (buprenorphine 0.2 mg plus naloxone 0.2 mg and buprenorphine 0.3 mg plus naloxone 0.2 mg) were assessed under double-blind conditions in six opioid-dependent volunteers. Physiologic measures and subject- and observer-rated behavioral responses were measured before dosing and for 120 min after drug administration. Hydromorphone decreased pupil diameter and respiration, increased blood pressure and increased scores on subjective measures indicating opioid-like effects. Buprenorphine given alone had no significant effect on any variable measured. Naloxone given alone produced opioid abstinence-like effects which were measurable on subject- and observer-rated behavioral measures and physiological measures. Buprenorphine in combination with naloxone somewhat attenuated the naloxone-precipitated withdrawal response. Overall, the naloxone-buprenorphine combinations produced effects which were qualitatively similar to the effects of naloxone alone, suggesting a low potential for abuse of the combination product by opioid-dependent individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fraser HF, Van Horn GD, Isbell H (1956) Studies of nalorphine in man. Am J Med Sci 231:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser HF, Van Horn GD, Martin WR, Wolbach AB, Isbell H (1961) Methods for evaluating addiction liability. (A) “Attitude” of opiate addicts toward opiate-like drugs, (B) A short-term “direct” addiction test. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 133:371–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I, Kaliszak JE (1980) Drug preference in humans: double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 215:649–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR (1977) Assessment of the abuse potentiality of morphine-like drugs (methods used in man). In: Martin WR (ed) Drug addiction I. Springer, New York, pp 197–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Mansky PA (1972) Evaluation of nalbuphine for abuse potential. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:78–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Martin WR, Hoeldtke RD (1970) Effects of short-and long-term administration of pentazocine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 11:385–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Griffith JD, Pevnick J, Clark SC (1975) Progress report on studies for the clinical pharmacology section of the Addiction Research Center. 37th Annual Meeting, The Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 121–161

  • Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, Griffith JD (1978) Human pharmacology and abuse potential of the analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35:501–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR, Henningfield JE, Hickey JE, Johnson RE (1983) Progress report of the NIDA Addiction Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland, 1982. In: Harris LS (ed) Problems of Drug Dependence, 1982, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 43, DHHS (ADM) 83–1264. Washington DC, pp 92–98

  • Kolb L, Himmelsbach CK (1938) Clinical studies of drug addiction, III. A critical review of the withdrawal treatments with method of evaluating abstinence syndromes. Am J Psychiatry 94:759–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Legros J, Khalili-Varasteh H, Margetts G (1984) Pharmacological study of pentazocine-naloxone combination: interest as a potentially non abusable oral form of pentazocine. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 271:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, Huppler RE, Gilbert PE (1976) The effects of morphine- and nalorphine-like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 197:517–532

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod D, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J (1982) An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test (DSST). Behav Res Methods Instrum 14:463–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt JG, Jasinski DR (1974) Methadone-naloxone mixtures for use in methadone maintenance programs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 15:156–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Parwatikar SD, Knowles RR (1973) Methadone-naloxone in combination for the treatment of heroin addicts. Clin Pharmacol Ther 14:941–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Poklis A (1984) Decline in abuse of pentazocine/tripelennamine (T's and Blues) associated with the addition of naloxone to pentazocine tablets. Drug Alcohol Depend 14:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolly G, Poelaert J, Mungroop H, Paelinck H (1986) A combination of buprenorphine and naloxone compared with buprenorphine administered intramuscularly in postoperative patients. J Int Med Res 14:148–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Senay EC (1985) Clinical experience with T's and B's. Drug Alcohol Depend 14:305–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanacker B, Vandermeersch E, Tomassen J (1986) Comparison of intramuscular buprenorphine and a buprenorphine/naloxone combination in the treatment of post-operative pain. Curr Med Res Opin 10:139–144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from Reckitt and Colman Pharmaceutical Division and USPHS Grants DA-00050 and DA-04089 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preston, K.L., Bigelow, G.E. & Liebson, I.A. Buprenorphine and naloxone alone and in combination in opioid-dependent humans. Psychopharmacology 94, 484–490 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212842

Key words

Navigation