Skip to main content
Log in

Preservation of immune response after laparoscopy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the immunologic responses following laparoscopic and open surgery by comparing delayed type hypersensitivity induration size before and after each method of accessing the abdominal cavity. One hundred and thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were sensitized with keyhole limpet hemocyanine (KLH). Animals were challenged with KLH and phytohemaglutanin (PHA) 10 days after sensitization. On day 14 after initial sensitization animals were randomly divided into three groups. Group one served as controls and had no procedure performed, group two underwent peritoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide gas to a pressure of 6–8 mm Hg for one half hour, and rats in group three had a midline laparotomy which was closed after one half hour. Each rat was challenged with KLH immediately and at three days post-operatively. The area of induration in response to each of the challenges was measured with calipers 24 and 48 hours after the challenge. Results of this skin testing showed that the group of animals that underwent laparotomy, despite having normal responses preoperatively, had significantly diminished responses to both KLH and PHA when challenged postoperatively. The insufflated group showed no differences from control animals at any time point examined. We conclude that DTH response in this model is better preserved after laparoscopy than laparotomy.

We further conclude that the defect in DTH response is in the effector arm. The question of the clinical significance of these findings is addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christou NV, Tellado-Rodriguez J, Chartrand L, Giannas B, Kapadia B, Meakins J, Rode H, Gordon J. (1989) Estimating mortality risk in preoperative patients using immunologic, nutritional, and acute-phase response variables. Ann Surg 210: 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christou NV, Ing AF, Larson DL, Meakins JL (1984) A reliable rat model of the delayed hypersensitivity skin test response. J Surg Res 37: 264–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eilber FR, Morton DL (1970) Impaired immunologic reactivity and recurrence following cancer surgery. Cancer 25: 362–367

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer JH, Nielsen HJ, Moesgaard F, Kehlet H (1992) Duration of postoperative immunosuppression assessed by repeated delayed type hypersensitivity skin test. Eur Surg Res 24: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hjortso NC, Kehlet H (1986) Influence of surgery, age, and serum albumin on delayed hypersensitivity. Acta Chir Scand 152: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson W, Ulrich F, Meguid M, Lepak N, Bowe P, Harris P, Alberts LH, Nabseth DC. (1979) Role of delayed hypersensitivity in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. Am J Surg 13: 538–542

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lennard TWJ, Shenton BK, Borzotta A, Donnelly PK, White M, Gerrie LM, Proud G, Taylor RMR (1985) The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br J Surg 72: 771–776

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mendenhall CL, Grossman CJ, Roselle GA, Ghosn SJ, Coyt TY, Thompson S, Dehne NE (1989) Phytohemagglutinin skin test responses to evaluate in vivo cellular immune function in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 190: 117–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen HJ, Hammer JH, Moesgaard F, Kehlet H (1991) Comparison of the effects of SAG-M and whole-blood transfusions on postoperative suppression of delayed hypersensitivity. Can J Surg 34: 146–150

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pietsch JB, Meakins JL, MacLean LD (1977) The delayed hypersensitivity response: application in clinical surgery. Surg 82: 349–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiermer PA, Longnecker DE, Mintz PD (1988) The possible immunosuppressive effects of perioperative blood transfusions in cancer patients. Anesthesiology 68: 422–428

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trokel, M.J., Bessler, M., Treat, M.R. et al. Preservation of immune response after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 8, 1385–1388 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187341

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187341

Key words

Navigation