Skip to main content
Log in

How to present research data consistently in a scientific paper

  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyzes, on a subjective basis, aspects of how to write scientific papers that will be accepted for publication in peer review journals. For each individual section of the manuscript, i.e. Introduction, Materials and methods, Results, Discussion, Abstract, and References, general comments and examples are given. It is concluded that writing scientific articles is a form of mental exercise that has to be practised to be successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegelman SS (1986) Radiology 1986 (editorial) Radiology 158: 265–266

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siegelman SS (1988) Advice to authors. Radiology 166: 278–280

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eyler WR (1980) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (editorial). Radiology 135: 239–243

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold RE (1986) Manuscript processing at the RSNA publication office (editorial). Radiology 158: 267–269

    Google Scholar 

  5. Redman H (1986) The art and some practical aspects ofabstract writing (editorial). Radiology 158: 270–271

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laniado, M. How to present research data consistently in a scientific paper. Eur. Radiol. 6, S16–S18 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00181169

Key words

Navigation