Skip to main content

Synonyms

OHS; Oxford 12-item hip score

Definition

A 12-item patient-reported measure (questionnaire) of hip pain and function dimensions/domains combined in one composite scale. Devised in 1996 (Dawson, Fitzpatrick, Carr, & Murray, 1996a) for assessing outcomes of hip replacement surgery. Oxford Hip Score © Isis Innovation Limited, Oxford UK 1998. All rights reserved. License available via http://www.isis-innovation.com/licensing/healthoutcomes/index.html or innovation@isis.ox.ac.uk.

Description

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) consists of 12 questionnaire items with 5 ordinal response options each. Recall period “during the past 4 weeks.” Scoring: each item 0–4 (4 = best/least problems). All item scores summed to produce scale 0–48 (48 = best/least problems).

Scoring: each item 0–4 (4 = best/least problems). All item scores summed to produce scale 0–48 (48 = best/least problems). Note that the recommended scoring system has changed since the original developmental paper was published...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., et al. (1992). Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 305, 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley, J. (1972). The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hipperformed as a primary intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 54, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996a). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 78, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1996b). Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Quality in Health Care, 5, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Frost, S., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., & Murray, D. (2001). Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 83-B, 1125–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, C., Epinette, J. A., Dawson, J., Murray, D., & Jolles, B. M. (2009). Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. Review Chirurgica Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 95(2), 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R., Morris, R., Hajat, S., Reeves, B., Murray, D. W., Hannen, D., et al. (2000). The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Quality in Health Care, 9, 146–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajat, S., Fitzpatrick, R., Morris, R., Reeves, B., Rigge, M., Williams, O., et al. (2002). Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenan, R., Gertman, P., & Mason, J. (1980). Measuring health status in rheumatoid arthritis: The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23, 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D. J., Carr, A. J., et al. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89-B, 1010–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naal, F. D., Sieverding, M., Impellizzeri, F. M., von Knoch, F., Mannion, A. F., & Leunig, M. (2009). Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(4), 952–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Dawson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dawson, J. (2014). Oxford Hip Score. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2045

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2045

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics