Synonyms
Definition
A 12-item patient-reported measure (questionnaire) of hip pain and function dimensions/domains combined in one composite scale. Devised in 1996 (Dawson, Fitzpatrick, Carr, & Murray, 1996a) for assessing outcomes of hip replacement surgery. Oxford Hip Score © Isis Innovation Limited, Oxford UK 1998. All rights reserved. License available via http://www.isis-innovation.com/licensing/healthoutcomes/index.html or innovation@isis.ox.ac.uk.
Description
The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) consists of 12 questionnaire items with 5 ordinal response options each. Recall period “during the past 4 weeks.” Scoring: each item 0–4 (4 = best/least problems). All item scores summed to produce scale 0–48 (48 = best/least problems).
Scoring: each item 0–4 (4 = best/least problems). All item scores summed to produce scale 0–48 (48 = best/least problems). Note that the recommended scoring system has changed since the original developmental paper was published...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307–310.
Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M., O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., et al. (1992). Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 305, 160–164.
Charnley, J. (1972). The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hipperformed as a primary intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 54, 61–76.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996a). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 78, 185–190.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1996b). Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Quality in Health Care, 5, 81–88.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Frost, S., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., & Murray, D. (2001). Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 83-B, 1125–1129.
Delaunay, C., Epinette, J. A., Dawson, J., Murray, D., & Jolles, B. M. (2009). Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population. Review Chirurgica Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 95(2), 89–99.
Fitzpatrick, R., Morris, R., Hajat, S., Reeves, B., Murray, D. W., Hannen, D., et al. (2000). The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Quality in Health Care, 9, 146–150.
Hajat, S., Fitzpatrick, R., Morris, R., Reeves, B., Rigge, M., Williams, O., et al. (2002). Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 19–25.
Meenan, R., Gertman, P., & Mason, J. (1980). Measuring health status in rheumatoid arthritis: The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23, 146–152.
Murray, D. W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D. J., Carr, A. J., et al. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89-B, 1010–1014.
Naal, F. D., Sieverding, M., Impellizzeri, F. M., von Knoch, F., Mannion, A. F., & Leunig, M. (2009). Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(4), 952–957.
Ware, J., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dawson, J. (2014). Oxford Hip Score. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2045
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2045
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law