Skip to main content

Vienna Transdanube Aging “VITA”: study design, recruitment strategies and level of participation

  • Conference paper
Ageing and Dementia Current and Future Concepts

Abstract

The Vienna Transdanube Aging study “VITA” is a prospective, interdisciplinary cohort-study of all 75-years old inhabitants of the 21. and 22, district of Vienna (n = 1,745), which started in May 2000. The study design is described in this paper for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bancher C, Jellinger K, Lassmann H, et al (1996) Correlations between mental state and quantitative neuropathology in the Vienna longitudinal study on dementia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 246: 137–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne EJ, Lennox GG, Godwin-Austen RB, et al (1991) Dementia associated with cortical Lewy bodies: proposed clinical diagnostic criteria. Dementia 2: 283–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson K, Forsell L, Amberla K, et al (1991) Graphic skills used as an instrument for detecting higher cortical dysfunctions in old age. Hum Mov Sci 10: 335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson K, Hilleras P, Holmen K, et al (1994) The short human figure drawing scale for evaluation of suspect cognitive dysfunction in old age. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 19:243–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahn S, Elton RL, and members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987) Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Caine DB, Goldstein M (eds) Recent development in Parkinson’s disease, vol 2. Macmillan Health Care Information, Florham Park, NJ, pp 153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer P, Gatterer G, Simanyi M, et al (1990) Memory deficits in advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm [P-D Sect] 2: 59–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer P, Jellinger K, Gatterer G, et al (1991) Prospective neuropathological validation of Hachinski’s ischemic score in dementias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54: 580–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “MiniMental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the c1inican. J Psychiatry Res 32: 632--637

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuld PA (1980) Guaranteed stimulus-processing in the evaluation of memory and learn-ing. Cortex 16: 255–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatterer G (1990) Alters-Konzentration-Test. Verlag fUr Psychologie, Hogrefe, Gottingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerlings MI, Jonker C, Bouter LM, et al (1999) Association between memory com-plaints and incident Alzheimer’s disease in elderly people with normal baseline cognition. Am J Psychiatry 156: 531–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genzel S (1991) Der Supermarkttest. Thesis, University of Eichstatt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachinski VC, Linette DI, Zilhka E, et al (1975) Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 32: 632–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1969) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23: 56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Cole M, Bellavance F, et al (2000) Tracking cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease using the Mini-Mental State Examination: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr 12: 231–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog AR, Rodgers WL, Kulka RA (1983) Interviewing older adults: a comparison of telephone and face-to-face modalities. Public Opin Q 47: 405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heun R, Hardt J, Muller H, et al (1997) Selection bias during recruitment of elderly subjects from general population for psychiatric interviews. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 247: 87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D, et al (1983) Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Verlag ftir Psychologie, Hogrefe, Gottingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CP, Berg L, Danzinger WL, et al (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140: 566–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ives DG, Kuller LH, Schulz R, et al (1992) Comparison of recruitment strategies and associated disease prevalence for helath promotion in rural elderly. Prev Med 21:582–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorm AF, Jacomb PA (1989) The informant questionaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): sociodemographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychol Med 51: 728–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm AF, Christensen H, Korten AE, et al (1997) Do cognitive complaints either predict future cognitive decline or reflect past cognitive decline? A longitudinal study of an elderly community sample. Psychol Med 27: 465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaro K, Minehisa N, Koichi S (1994) A case-control study of Alzheimer’s disease in Japan - significance of life-styles. Dementia 5: 314–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz EM (1968) Psychological evaluation of childrens human figure drawings. Grune and Stratton, New York London

    Google Scholar 

  • Launer LJ, Wind AW, Deeg DJH (1994) Nonresponse pattern and bias in a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive functioning among elderly. Am J Epidemiol 139: 803–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, Spielberger CD (1981) Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Beltz Test GmbH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton M, Brody E (1969) Assessment of older people: selfmaintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manos PJ (1994) Ten-point clock test sensitivity for Alzheimer’s disease in patients with MMSE scores greater than 23. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 14: 454–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattis S (1973) Dementia Rating Scale. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Me Caffrey RJ, DuffK, Solomon GS (2000) Olfactory dysfunction discriminates probable Alzheimer’s dementia from Major depression: a cross-validation and extension. J Neuropsychiat C1in Neurosci 12: 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Me Keith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et aI, for the Consortium on Dementia with Lewy Bodies (1996) Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of de-mentia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology 47: 1113–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of depart-ment of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34:939–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez MF, Ala T, Underwood KL (1992) Development of scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 40: 1095–1099

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendiondo MS, Ashford JW, Kryscio RJ, et al (2000) Modelling mini mental state examination changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Stat Med 19: 1607–1616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan A, Harris M, Boyce P, et al (1997) Has social psychiatry met its Waterloo? Meth-odological and ethical issues in a community study. Austr NZ J Psychiatry 27: 411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, et al and the CERAD investigators (1989) The consor-tium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD), part I. Clinical and neuropsycho-logical assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 39: 1159–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MC, Evans DE, Hebert LE, Bienias JL (1999) Methodological issues in the study of cognitive decline. Am J Epidemiol 149: 789–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neaton JD, Grimm RH Jr, Cutler JA (1987) Recruitment of participants for the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). Contr Clin Trials 8: 41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton MC, Breitner JCS, Welsh KA, et al (1994) Characteristics of nonresponders in a community survey of the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 42: 1252–1256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan RM (1956) Trail Making Test. Manual for administration, scoring, and interpreta-tion. Indiana University, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel-Heller SG, Schork A, Matschinger H, et al (2000) Recruitment procedures and their impact on the prevalence of dementia. Neuroepidemiology 19: 130–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al (1993) Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN international workshop. Neurology 43: 250–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen WG, Terry RD, Fuld PA, et al (1980) Pathological verification of ischemia score in differentiation of dementias. Ann Neurol 7: 486–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sab H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M (1996) Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer StOrungen DSM-IV. Hogrefe, Gottingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Freidl W, Fazekas F, et al (1994) The Mattis Dementia Scale: normative data from 1001 healthy volunteers. Neurology 44: 964–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh LL, Yesavage JA (1986) Geriatric depression scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. C1in Gerontol 5: 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Small BJ, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, et al (2000) The course of cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 57: 839–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) STAI, manual for the the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss EV, Fratiglioni L, Jorm AF, et al (1998) Attitudes and participation of the elderlyin population surveys: data from a longitudinal study on aging and dementia in Stockholm. J Clin Epidemiol 51: 181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Lund and Manchester Groups (1994) Clinical and neuropathological criteria for fronto-temporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57: 416–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt TM, Ireland CC, Black D, et al (1986) Recruitment of elderly volunteers for a multicentre clinical trial: the SHEP pilot study. Contr Clin Trials 7: 118–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziler H (1975) Der Mann-Zeichen-Test in detailstatistischer Auswertung. Aschendorf, MUnster

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fischer, P. et al. (2002). Vienna Transdanube Aging “VITA”: study design, recruitment strategies and level of participation. In: Jellinger, K.A., Schmidt, R., Windisch, M. (eds) Ageing and Dementia Current and Future Concepts. Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementa, vol 62. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6139-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6139-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83796-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6139-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics