Abstract
Myelomeningocele has been recognized since ancient times although written descriptions began not before the 17th century. Among all serious congenital malformations, myelomeningocele is unique that is has a steady and considerable prevalence while being compatible with life. It has a dismal prognosis when left untreated where virtually all die within the first year while aggressive treatment have a profound effect on survival and quality of life. Effective surgical treatment became possible parallel to the treatment of hydrocephalus in the late 1950s. Advent of the shunt systems undoubtedly changed the morbidity and mortality rates due to associated hydrocephalus. Aggressive and effective treatment improved survival rates but also those suffering physical and mental disabilities have increased as well. Ethical and socioeconomic concerns have led to proposal for selective treatment criteria which have raised arguments on medical and ethico-legal rounds. After the swing of the pendulum between early treatment in all affected children and selective treatment of those who fulfilled the criteria for good prognosis, early myelomeningocele repair is practiced widely unless the infant is critically ill.
Incidence of myelomeningocele has been decreasing especially in the Western world, partly due to prenatal diagnosis and elective terminations, dietary folate supplementation. Still, it is the most common central nervous system malformation and one of the leading causes of paraplegia, worldwide. Unfortunately, gains in the management of myelomeningocele have been mainly on antenatal diagnosis and prevention while efforts on understanding its cause, mechanisms involved are still tentative. Concerning the surgical management, no revolutionary modification improving outcome has been introduced unlike other fields of neurosurgery.
Medical management of a child with myelomeningocele requires a lifelong effort of several disciplines including urology, orthopedics physical and social therapy besides neurosurgery. The initial and probably the most crucial step begin with proper repair of the lesion. The aim of surgery, with its simplest definition should be towards maintaining the medical condition of the newborn. In other words, consequences of an open spinal cord segment with associated malformations have to be avoided with appropriate measures. Comparable to the surgical treatment of any congenital malformation, myelomeningocele repair consist of reversing the failed steps of normal neural tube closure. This requires a thorough understanding of the normal and abnormal embryological sequence of events in formation of the spinal cord. Although the purpose of this chapter is to describe the basic concepts and technique of myelomeningocele repair, contemporary information and progress on epidemiology, and etiology and embryology is presented with discussion of controversial issues regarding the selection process, optimal time for surgery and technical modifications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnell K (2006) Primary and secondary tissue expansion gives high quality skin and subcutaneous coverage in children with a large myelomeningocele and kyphosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148: 293–297
Bell WO, Nelson LH, Block SM, Rhoney JC (1996) Prenatal diagnosis and pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 24: 134–137
Bliton MJ (2005) Parental hope confronting scientific uncertainty: a test of ethics in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48: 595–607
Bouchard S, Davey MG, Rintoul NE, Walsh DS, Rorke LB, Adzick NS (2003) Correction of hindbrain herniation and anatomy of the vermis after in utero repair of myelomeningocele in sheep. J Pediatr Surg 38: 451–458
Bower C, Raymond M, Lumley J, Bury G (1993) Trends in neural tube defects 1980–1989. Med J Aust 158: 152–154
Bowman RM, Boshnjaku V, McLone DG (2009) The changing incidence of myelomeningocele and its impact on pediatric neurosurgery: a review from the Children’s Memorial Hospital. Childs Nerv Syst 25: 801–806
Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34: 114–120
Boyd PA, Wellesley DG, De Walle HE, Tenconi R, Garcia-Minaur S, Zandwijken GR, Stoll C, Clementi M (2000) Evaluation of the prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by fetal ultrasonographic examination in different centres across Europe. M J Med Screen 7: 169–174
Bozkurt G, Sackesen C, Civelek E, Kalayci O, Akalan N, Cataltepe O (2010) Latex sensitization and allergy in children with spina bifida in Turkey. Childs Nerv Syst [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 20499239
Brocklehurst G, Gleave JR, Lewin W (1967) Early closure of myelomeningocele, with special reference to leg movement. Br Med J 1: 666–669
Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C (2008) Myelomeningocele primary repair surgical technique. In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida, management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 143–155
Cameron M, Moran P (2009) Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn 29: 402–411
Campbell LR, Dayton DH, Sohal GS (1986) Neural tube defects: a review of human and animal studies on the etiology of neural tube defects. Teratology 34: 171–187
Campobasso P, Pesce C, Costa L, Cimaglia ML (2004) The use of the Limberg skin flap for closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles. Pediatr Surg Int 20: 144–147
Catala M (2008) Embryology applied to neural tube defects (NTDs). In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida, management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 19–42
Chambers CD, Johnson KA, Dick LM, Felix RJ, Jones KL (1998) Maternal fever and birth outcome: a prospective study. Teratology 58: 251–257
Charney EB, Weller SC, Sutton LN, Bruce DA, Schut LB (1985) Management of the newborn with myelomeningocele: time for a decision-making process. Pediatrics 75: 58–64
Cochrane D, Aronyk K, Sawatzky B, Wilson D, Steinbok P (1991) The effects of labor and delivery on spinal cord function and ambulation in patients with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 7: 312–315
Cohen RA, Robinson S (2001) Early management of myelomeningocele. In: McLone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery: surgery of the developing nervous system, 4th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 241–259
Cuckle H, Wald N (1987) The impact of screening for open neural tube defects in England and Wales. Prenat Diagn 7: 91–99
Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, Duguay S, Seidel K, Loeser JD, Ellenbogan RG (2005) Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 41: 186–191
De Marco P, Merello E, Mascelli S, Capra V (2006) Current perspectives on the genetic causes of neural tube defects. Neurogenetics 7: 201–221
Dias MS (1999) Myelomeningocele. In: Choux M, Di Rocco C, Hockley A, Walker M (eds) Pediatric neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, pp 33–59
Dias MS, McLone DG (2001) Normal and abnormal early development of the nervous system. In: Mc Lone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery: surgery of the developing nervous system, 4th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 31–71
Dias MS, Partington M (2004) Embryology of myelomeningocele and anencephaly. Neurosurg Focus 16(2): E1
Doherty D, Shurtleff DB (2006) Pediatric perspective on prenatal counseling for myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 76: 645–653
Drugan A, Krause B, Canady A, Zador IE, Sacks AJ, Evans MI (1989) The natural history of prenatally diagnosed cerebral ventriculomegaly. JAMA 261: 1785–1788
Erşahin Y, Yurtseven T (2004) Delayed repair of large myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 20: 427–429
Eurocat Working Group (1991) Prevalence of neural tube defects in 20 regions of Europe and impact of prenatal diagnosis, 1980–1986. J Epidemiol Community Health 45: 52–58
Gross RH, Cox A, Tatyrek R, Pollay M, Barnes WA (1983) Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 72: 450–458
Hirose S, Farmer DL (2009) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Clin Perinatol 36: 431–438
Iskandar BJ, Tubbs S, Mapstone TB, Grabb PA, Bartolucci AA, Oakes WJ (1998) Death in shunted hydrocephalic children in the 1990s. Pediatr Neurosurg 28: 173–176
Jacobs RA, Negrete V, Johnson M, Korsch BM (1989) Parental opinions on treatment decisions for myelomeningocele infants: a descriptive study. Z Kinderchir 44: 11–13
Kanbur NO, Güner P, Derman O, Akalan N, Cila A, Kutluk T (2004) Diastematomyelia: a case with familial aggregation of neural tube defects. Scientific World Journal 4: 847–852
Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2005) Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5: 564–576
Kaufman BA (2004) Neural tube defects. Pediatr Clin North Am 51: 389–419
Kibar Z, Capra V, Gros P (2007) Toward understanding the genetic basis of neural tube defects. Clin Genet 71: 295–310
Luthy DA, Wardinsky T, Shurtleff DB, Hollenbach KA, Hickok DE, Nyberg DA, Benedetti TJ (1991) Cesarean section before the onset of labor and subsequent motor function in infants with meningomyelocele diagnosed antenatally. N Engl J Med 324: 662–666
Marlin AE (2004) Management of hydrocephalus in the patient with myelomeningocele: an argument against third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Focus 16(2): E4
McCullough DC, Johnson DL (1994) Myelomeningocele repair: technical considerations and complications. 1988. Pediatr Neurosurg 21: 83–89
McDonnell R, Johnson Z, Doyle A, Sayers G (1999) Determinants of folic acid knowledge and use among antenatal women. J Public Health Med 21: 145–149
McLone DG (1983) Results of treatment of children born with a myelomeningocele. Clin Neurosurg 30: 407–412
McLone DG (1992) Continuing concepts in the management of spina bifida. Pediatr Neurosurg 18: 254–256
McLone DG (2005) Spinal dysraphism: impact of technique and technology on expectations. Clin Neurosurg 52: 261–264
McLone DG, Knepper PA (1989) The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 15: 1–12
Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL (1996) Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol 11: 370–372
Mitchell LE (2005) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 135(1): 88–94
Moretti ME, Bar-Oz B, Fried S, Koren G (2005) Maternal hyperthermia and the risk for neural tube defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 16: 216
Nielsen LAG, Maroun LL, Broholm H, Laursen H, Graem N (2006) Neural tube defects and associated anomalies in a fetal and perinatal autopsy series. APMIS 114: 239–246
Nikkila A, Rydhstrom H, Kallen B (2006) The incidence of spina bifida in Sweden 1973–2003: the effect of prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Public Health 6: 660–662
Oakley GP Jr, Weber MB, Bell KN, Colditz P (2004) Scientific evidence supporting folic acid fortification of flour in Australia and New Zealand. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 70: 838–841
Osaka K, Tanimura T, Hirayama A, Matsumoto S (1978) Myelomeningocele before birth. J Neurosurg 49: 711–724
Padmanabhan R (2006) Etiology, pathogenesis and prevention of neural tube defects. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 46: 55–67
Parent AD, McMillan T (1995) Contemporaneous shunting with repair of myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 22: 132–135
Park TS (1999) Myelomeningocele. In: Albright L, Pollack I, Adelson D (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. Thieme, NewYork, pp 291–315
Patten BM (1953) Embryological stages in the establishment of myeloschisis with spina bifida. Am J Anat 93: 365–395
Perry VL, Albright AL, Adelson PD (2002) Operative nuances of myelomeningocele closure. Neurosurgery 51: 719–723
Pinar H, Tatevosyants N, Singer DB (1998) Central nervous system malformations in a perinatal/neonatal autopsy series. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1: 42–48
Pinto FC, Matushita H, Furlan AL, Alho EJ, Goldenberg DC, Bunduki V, Krebs VL, Teixeira MJ (2009) Surgical treatment of myelomeningocele carried out at “time zero” immediately after birth. Pediatr Neurosurg 45: 114–118
Rahman M, Perkins LA, Pincus DW, (2009) Aggressive surgical management of patients with Chiari II malformation and brainstem dysfunction. Pediatr Neurosurg 45: 337–344
Raybaud C, Miller E (2008) Radiological evaluation of myelomeningocele-Chiari II malformation. In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida. Management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 19–42
Rekate HL (1985) To shunt or not to shunt: hydrocephalus and dysraphism. Clin Neurosurg 32: 593–607
Rowland CA, Correa A, Cragan JD, Alverson CJ (2006) Are encephaloceles neural tube defects? Pediatrics 118: 916–923
Sarifakioglu N, Bingül F, Terzioglu A, Ates L, Aslan G (2003) Bilateral split latissimus dorsi V-Y flaps for closure of large thoracolumbar meningomyelocele defects. Br J Plast Surg 56: 303–306
Sbragia L (2010) Intrauterine fetal abnormalities therapy. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 32(1): 47–54
Scott RM, Wolpert SM, Bartoshesky LE, Zimbler S, Klauber GT (1986) Dermoid tumors occurring at the site of previous myelomeningocele repair. J Neurosurg 65: 779–783
Smyth BT, Piggot J, Forsythe WI, Merrett JD (1974) A controlled trial of immediate and delayed closure of myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56: 297–304
Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ (1992) Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 8: 92–96
Sutton LN (2008) Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22: 175–188
Talamonti G, D’aliberti G, Collice M (2007) Myelomeningocele: long-term neurosurgical treatment and follow-up in 202 patients. J Neurosurg 107 (Suppl.): 368–386
Tuli S, Drake J, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2003) Long-term outcome of hydrocephalus management in myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 19: 286–291
Van Allen MI (1996) Multisite neural tube closure in humans. Birth Defects Orig Arctic Ser 30: 203–225
Vashu R, Liew NS (2010) Double neural tube defect: a case report and discussions on neural tube development. Childs Nerv Syst 26: 697–701
Venes JL (1985) Surgical considerations in the initial repair of meningomyelocele and the introduction of a technical modification. Neurosurgery 17: 111–113
von Koch CS, Gupta N, Sutton LN, Sun PP (2003) In utero surgery for hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 19: 574–586
Walsh DS, Adzick NS (2003) Foetal surgery for spina bifida. Semin Neonatol 8: 197–205
Wendt LV, Rantakallio P (1986) Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in a 1-year birth cohort followed to the age of 14 years. Childs Nerv Syst 2: 80–82
Werler MM, Louik C, Shapiro S, Mitchell AA (1996) Prepregnant weight in relation to risk of neural tube defects. JAMA 275: 1089–1092
Wong LY, Paulozzi LJ (2001) Survival of infants with spina bifida: a population study, 1979–94. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15: 374–378
Yen IH, Khoury MJ, Erickson JD, James LM, Waters GD, Berry RJ (1992) The changing epidemiology of neural tube defects. United States, 1968–1989. Am J Dis Child 146: 857–861
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag=Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akalan, N. (2011). Myelomeningocele (open spina bifida) — surgical management. In: Pickard, J.D., et al. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol 37. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0673-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0673-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0672-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0673-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)