Skip to main content

Myelomeningocele (open spina bifida) — surgical management

  • Chapter
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery ((NEUROSURGERY,volume 37))

Abstract

Myelomeningocele has been recognized since ancient times although written descriptions began not before the 17th century. Among all serious congenital malformations, myelomeningocele is unique that is has a steady and considerable prevalence while being compatible with life. It has a dismal prognosis when left untreated where virtually all die within the first year while aggressive treatment have a profound effect on survival and quality of life. Effective surgical treatment became possible parallel to the treatment of hydrocephalus in the late 1950s. Advent of the shunt systems undoubtedly changed the morbidity and mortality rates due to associated hydrocephalus. Aggressive and effective treatment improved survival rates but also those suffering physical and mental disabilities have increased as well. Ethical and socioeconomic concerns have led to proposal for selective treatment criteria which have raised arguments on medical and ethico-legal rounds. After the swing of the pendulum between early treatment in all affected children and selective treatment of those who fulfilled the criteria for good prognosis, early myelomeningocele repair is practiced widely unless the infant is critically ill.

Incidence of myelomeningocele has been decreasing especially in the Western world, partly due to prenatal diagnosis and elective terminations, dietary folate supplementation. Still, it is the most common central nervous system malformation and one of the leading causes of paraplegia, worldwide. Unfortunately, gains in the management of myelomeningocele have been mainly on antenatal diagnosis and prevention while efforts on understanding its cause, mechanisms involved are still tentative. Concerning the surgical management, no revolutionary modification improving outcome has been introduced unlike other fields of neurosurgery.

Medical management of a child with myelomeningocele requires a lifelong effort of several disciplines including urology, orthopedics physical and social therapy besides neurosurgery. The initial and probably the most crucial step begin with proper repair of the lesion. The aim of surgery, with its simplest definition should be towards maintaining the medical condition of the newborn. In other words, consequences of an open spinal cord segment with associated malformations have to be avoided with appropriate measures. Comparable to the surgical treatment of any congenital malformation, myelomeningocele repair consist of reversing the failed steps of normal neural tube closure. This requires a thorough understanding of the normal and abnormal embryological sequence of events in formation of the spinal cord. Although the purpose of this chapter is to describe the basic concepts and technique of myelomeningocele repair, contemporary information and progress on epidemiology, and etiology and embryology is presented with discussion of controversial issues regarding the selection process, optimal time for surgery and technical modifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnell K (2006) Primary and secondary tissue expansion gives high quality skin and subcutaneous coverage in children with a large myelomeningocele and kyphosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148: 293–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell WO, Nelson LH, Block SM, Rhoney JC (1996) Prenatal diagnosis and pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 24: 134–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bliton MJ (2005) Parental hope confronting scientific uncertainty: a test of ethics in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48: 595–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchard S, Davey MG, Rintoul NE, Walsh DS, Rorke LB, Adzick NS (2003) Correction of hindbrain herniation and anatomy of the vermis after in utero repair of myelomeningocele in sheep. J Pediatr Surg 38: 451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bower C, Raymond M, Lumley J, Bury G (1993) Trends in neural tube defects 1980–1989. Med J Aust 158: 152–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowman RM, Boshnjaku V, McLone DG (2009) The changing incidence of myelomeningocele and its impact on pediatric neurosurgery: a review from the Children’s Memorial Hospital. Childs Nerv Syst 25: 801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34: 114–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd PA, Wellesley DG, De Walle HE, Tenconi R, Garcia-Minaur S, Zandwijken GR, Stoll C, Clementi M (2000) Evaluation of the prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by fetal ultrasonographic examination in different centres across Europe. M J Med Screen 7: 169–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bozkurt G, Sackesen C, Civelek E, Kalayci O, Akalan N, Cataltepe O (2010) Latex sensitization and allergy in children with spina bifida in Turkey. Childs Nerv Syst [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 20499239

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brocklehurst G, Gleave JR, Lewin W (1967) Early closure of myelomeningocele, with special reference to leg movement. Br Med J 1: 666–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C (2008) Myelomeningocele primary repair surgical technique. In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida, management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 143–155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameron M, Moran P (2009) Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn 29: 402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell LR, Dayton DH, Sohal GS (1986) Neural tube defects: a review of human and animal studies on the etiology of neural tube defects. Teratology 34: 171–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Campobasso P, Pesce C, Costa L, Cimaglia ML (2004) The use of the Limberg skin flap for closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles. Pediatr Surg Int 20: 144–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catala M (2008) Embryology applied to neural tube defects (NTDs). In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida, management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 19–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Chambers CD, Johnson KA, Dick LM, Felix RJ, Jones KL (1998) Maternal fever and birth outcome: a prospective study. Teratology 58: 251–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Charney EB, Weller SC, Sutton LN, Bruce DA, Schut LB (1985) Management of the newborn with myelomeningocele: time for a decision-making process. Pediatrics 75: 58–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cochrane D, Aronyk K, Sawatzky B, Wilson D, Steinbok P (1991) The effects of labor and delivery on spinal cord function and ambulation in patients with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 7: 312–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen RA, Robinson S (2001) Early management of myelomeningocele. In: McLone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery: surgery of the developing nervous system, 4th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 241–259

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cuckle H, Wald N (1987) The impact of screening for open neural tube defects in England and Wales. Prenat Diagn 7: 91–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, Duguay S, Seidel K, Loeser JD, Ellenbogan RG (2005) Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 41: 186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Marco P, Merello E, Mascelli S, Capra V (2006) Current perspectives on the genetic causes of neural tube defects. Neurogenetics 7: 201–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dias MS (1999) Myelomeningocele. In: Choux M, Di Rocco C, Hockley A, Walker M (eds) Pediatric neurosurgery. Churchill Livingstone, pp 33–59

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dias MS, McLone DG (2001) Normal and abnormal early development of the nervous system. In: Mc Lone DG (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery: surgery of the developing nervous system, 4th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 31–71

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dias MS, Partington M (2004) Embryology of myelomeningocele and anencephaly. Neurosurg Focus 16(2): E1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Doherty D, Shurtleff DB (2006) Pediatric perspective on prenatal counseling for myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 76: 645–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Drugan A, Krause B, Canady A, Zador IE, Sacks AJ, Evans MI (1989) The natural history of prenatally diagnosed cerebral ventriculomegaly. JAMA 261: 1785–1788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erşahin Y, Yurtseven T (2004) Delayed repair of large myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 20: 427–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eurocat Working Group (1991) Prevalence of neural tube defects in 20 regions of Europe and impact of prenatal diagnosis, 1980–1986. J Epidemiol Community Health 45: 52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gross RH, Cox A, Tatyrek R, Pollay M, Barnes WA (1983) Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 72: 450–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirose S, Farmer DL (2009) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Clin Perinatol 36: 431–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Iskandar BJ, Tubbs S, Mapstone TB, Grabb PA, Bartolucci AA, Oakes WJ (1998) Death in shunted hydrocephalic children in the 1990s. Pediatr Neurosurg 28: 173–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs RA, Negrete V, Johnson M, Korsch BM (1989) Parental opinions on treatment decisions for myelomeningocele infants: a descriptive study. Z Kinderchir 44: 11–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanbur NO, Güner P, Derman O, Akalan N, Cila A, Kutluk T (2004) Diastematomyelia: a case with familial aggregation of neural tube defects. Scientific World Journal 4: 847–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2005) Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5: 564–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaufman BA (2004) Neural tube defects. Pediatr Clin North Am 51: 389–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kibar Z, Capra V, Gros P (2007) Toward understanding the genetic basis of neural tube defects. Clin Genet 71: 295–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Luthy DA, Wardinsky T, Shurtleff DB, Hollenbach KA, Hickok DE, Nyberg DA, Benedetti TJ (1991) Cesarean section before the onset of labor and subsequent motor function in infants with meningomyelocele diagnosed antenatally. N Engl J Med 324: 662–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Marlin AE (2004) Management of hydrocephalus in the patient with myelomeningocele: an argument against third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Focus 16(2): E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCullough DC, Johnson DL (1994) Myelomeningocele repair: technical considerations and complications. 1988. Pediatr Neurosurg 21: 83–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McDonnell R, Johnson Z, Doyle A, Sayers G (1999) Determinants of folic acid knowledge and use among antenatal women. J Public Health Med 21: 145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. McLone DG (1983) Results of treatment of children born with a myelomeningocele. Clin Neurosurg 30: 407–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McLone DG (1992) Continuing concepts in the management of spina bifida. Pediatr Neurosurg 18: 254–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McLone DG (2005) Spinal dysraphism: impact of technique and technology on expectations. Clin Neurosurg 52: 261–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McLone DG, Knepper PA (1989) The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 15: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL (1996) Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol 11: 370–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitchell LE (2005) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 135(1): 88–94

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moretti ME, Bar-Oz B, Fried S, Koren G (2005) Maternal hyperthermia and the risk for neural tube defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 16: 216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nielsen LAG, Maroun LL, Broholm H, Laursen H, Graem N (2006) Neural tube defects and associated anomalies in a fetal and perinatal autopsy series. APMIS 114: 239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nikkila A, Rydhstrom H, Kallen B (2006) The incidence of spina bifida in Sweden 1973–2003: the effect of prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Public Health 6: 660–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oakley GP Jr, Weber MB, Bell KN, Colditz P (2004) Scientific evidence supporting folic acid fortification of flour in Australia and New Zealand. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 70: 838–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Osaka K, Tanimura T, Hirayama A, Matsumoto S (1978) Myelomeningocele before birth. J Neurosurg 49: 711–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Padmanabhan R (2006) Etiology, pathogenesis and prevention of neural tube defects. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 46: 55–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Parent AD, McMillan T (1995) Contemporaneous shunting with repair of myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 22: 132–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Park TS (1999) Myelomeningocele. In: Albright L, Pollack I, Adelson D (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. Thieme, NewYork, pp 291–315

    Google Scholar 

  56. Patten BM (1953) Embryological stages in the establishment of myeloschisis with spina bifida. Am J Anat 93: 365–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Perry VL, Albright AL, Adelson PD (2002) Operative nuances of myelomeningocele closure. Neurosurgery 51: 719–723

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pinar H, Tatevosyants N, Singer DB (1998) Central nervous system malformations in a perinatal/neonatal autopsy series. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1: 42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Pinto FC, Matushita H, Furlan AL, Alho EJ, Goldenberg DC, Bunduki V, Krebs VL, Teixeira MJ (2009) Surgical treatment of myelomeningocele carried out at “time zero” immediately after birth. Pediatr Neurosurg 45: 114–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rahman M, Perkins LA, Pincus DW, (2009) Aggressive surgical management of patients with Chiari II malformation and brainstem dysfunction. Pediatr Neurosurg 45: 337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Raybaud C, Miller E (2008) Radiological evaluation of myelomeningocele-Chiari II malformation. In: Ozek MM, Cinalli G, Maixnerr WJ (eds) Spina bifida. Management and outcome. Springer, Italia, pp 19–42

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rekate HL (1985) To shunt or not to shunt: hydrocephalus and dysraphism. Clin Neurosurg 32: 593–607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rowland CA, Correa A, Cragan JD, Alverson CJ (2006) Are encephaloceles neural tube defects? Pediatrics 118: 916–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sarifakioglu N, Bingül F, Terzioglu A, Ates L, Aslan G (2003) Bilateral split latissimus dorsi V-Y flaps for closure of large thoracolumbar meningomyelocele defects. Br J Plast Surg 56: 303–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sbragia L (2010) Intrauterine fetal abnormalities therapy. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 32(1): 47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Scott RM, Wolpert SM, Bartoshesky LE, Zimbler S, Klauber GT (1986) Dermoid tumors occurring at the site of previous myelomeningocele repair. J Neurosurg 65: 779–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Smyth BT, Piggot J, Forsythe WI, Merrett JD (1974) A controlled trial of immediate and delayed closure of myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56: 297–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ (1992) Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 8: 92–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sutton LN (2008) Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22: 175–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Talamonti G, D’aliberti G, Collice M (2007) Myelomeningocele: long-term neurosurgical treatment and follow-up in 202 patients. J Neurosurg 107 (Suppl.): 368–386

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tuli S, Drake J, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2003) Long-term outcome of hydrocephalus management in myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 19: 286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Van Allen MI (1996) Multisite neural tube closure in humans. Birth Defects Orig Arctic Ser 30: 203–225

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vashu R, Liew NS (2010) Double neural tube defect: a case report and discussions on neural tube development. Childs Nerv Syst 26: 697–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Venes JL (1985) Surgical considerations in the initial repair of meningomyelocele and the introduction of a technical modification. Neurosurgery 17: 111–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. von Koch CS, Gupta N, Sutton LN, Sun PP (2003) In utero surgery for hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 19: 574–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Walsh DS, Adzick NS (2003) Foetal surgery for spina bifida. Semin Neonatol 8: 197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wendt LV, Rantakallio P (1986) Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in a 1-year birth cohort followed to the age of 14 years. Childs Nerv Syst 2: 80–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Werler MM, Louik C, Shapiro S, Mitchell AA (1996) Prepregnant weight in relation to risk of neural tube defects. JAMA 275: 1089–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wong LY, Paulozzi LJ (2001) Survival of infants with spina bifida: a population study, 1979–94. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15: 374–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Yen IH, Khoury MJ, Erickson JD, James LM, Waters GD, Berry RJ (1992) The changing epidemiology of neural tube defects. United States, 1968–1989. Am J Dis Child 146: 857–861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag=Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akalan, N. (2011). Myelomeningocele (open spina bifida) — surgical management. In: Pickard, J.D., et al. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol 37. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0673-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0673-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0672-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0673-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics