Skip to main content

Value of Noninvasive Imaging in Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysm

  • Conference paper
Early Brain Injury or Cerebral Vasospasm

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 110/2))

Abstract

Follow-up is necessary for treated and untreated aneurysms. The purpose of this study is to assess the results of treated aneurysms, the development of untreated aneurysms and the incidence of new aneurysms through short-term follow-up with noninvasive imaging, including CTA and MRA. More-than-once follow-up imaging with either CTA or MRA was performed in 73 patients, 65 of them suffering SAH. CTA was performed in 46 patients with clipped aneurysms, 9 patients with coiled aneurysms and 8 cases with untreated aneurysms. MRA was performed in ten patients with coiled aneurysms. CTA follow-up demonstrated that in 48 clipped aneurysms, 47 aneurysms completely disappeared; one aneurysm with neck remnant and one new aneurysm was found. No recurrence was found after microsurgical clipping. CTA follow-up provided limited information for ten coiled aneurysms because of poor quality images due to artifacts from coil. MRA follow-up of 12 coiled aneurysms showed there were no recanalization, recurrence or new aneurysm. In 20 untreated aneurysms, 19 stayed unchanged, and one aneurysm automatically disappeared. The newest generation of CTA and MRA can be used for following-up of intracranial aneurysms, and is more readily accepted by Chinese patients because of convenience, non-invasiveness and low price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keedy A. An overview of intracranial aneurysms. Mcgill J Med. 2006;9:141–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part II: CT angiographic follow-up of surgically clipped aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1207–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1001–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Romijn M, Gratama van Andel HA, van Walderveen MA, Sprengers ME, van Rijn JC, van Rooij WJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:134–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang P-H, Hui F, Sitoh Y-Y. Intracranial aneurysm detection with 3t magnetic resonance angiography. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36:388–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Majoie CBLM, Sprengers ME, Willem Jan J, Rooij V, Lavini C, Sluzewski M, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1349–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Westerlaan HE, Gravendeel J, Fiore D, Metzemaekers JD, Groen RJ, Mooij JJ, et al. Multislice CT angiography in the selection of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for clipping or coiling. Neuroradiology 2007;49:997–1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Choi CS, Cho BM, Oh SM, Chang SK. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:60–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pozzi-Mucelli F, Bruni S, Doddi M, Calgaro A, Braini M, Cova M. Detection of intracranial aneurysms with 64 channel multidetector row computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:15–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lubicz B, Levivier M, François O, Thoma P, Sadeghi N, Collignon L, et al. Sixty-four-row multisection CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility. ANJR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1949–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hiratsuka Y, Miki H, Kiriyama I, Kikuchi K, Takahashi S, Matsubara I, et al. Diagnosis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: 3T MR angiography versus 64-channel multi-detector row CT angiography. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7:169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Ferré JC, Taschner CA, Carsin-Nicol B, Auffray-Calvier E, et al. Imaging of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neuroradiol. 2009;36:65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uysal E, Ozel A, Erturk SM, Kirdar O, Basak M. Comparison of multislice computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the detection of residual or recurrent aneurysm after surgical clipping with titanium clips. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151:131–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamada Watanabe Y, Kashiwagi N, Yamada N, Higashi M, Fukuda T, Morikawa S, et al. Subtraction 3D CT angiography with the orbital synchronized helical scan technique for the evaluation of postoperative cerebral aneurysms treated with cobalt-alloy clips. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1071–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pechlivanis I, Koenen D, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Koenig M, Heuser L, et al. Computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of clip placement for intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:669–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pechlivanis I, König M, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Heuser L, Harders A, et al. Evaluation of clip artefacts in three-dimensional computed tomography. Cen Eur Neurosurg. 2009;70:9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mamourian AC, Erkmen K, Pluta DJ. Nonhelical acquisition CT angiogram after aneurysmal clipping: in vitro testing shows diminished artifact. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;660–2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sagara Y, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Sainoo M, Nagatomi H, Mori H. Limitations of three-dimensional reconstructed computerized tomography angiography after clip placement for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayashi K, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M, Horie N, Kawakubo J, Hiu T, et al. Long-term follow-up of endovascular coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms using three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neurol Res. 2009;31:674–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mamourian AC, Pluta DJ, Eskey CJ, Merlis AL. Optimizing computed tomography to reduce artifacts from titanium aneurysm clips: an in vitro study. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:1238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A, Velthuis B. Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:60–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. White PM, Wardlaw JM. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms detection and management. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:336–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lubicz B, Neugroschl C, Collignon L, François O, Balériaux D. Is digital subtraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils? Neuroradiology 2008;50:841–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Rinkel GJ, Velthuis BK, de Kort GA, et al. MR angiography follow-up 5 years after coiling: Frequency of new aneurysms and enlargement of untreated aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:303–07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ van den Berg R, Rinkel GJ, Akkerman EM, et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(9):1665–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma J, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Rinkel GJ, et al. Stability of intracranial aneurysms adequately occluded 6 months after coiling: a 3T MR angiography multicenter long-term follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1768–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferré JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):365–369. Epub 2008 Sep 21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, Terbrugge KG, Farb RI. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1570–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Caron S, Taschner CA, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Righi C, Simionato F, Cadioli M, et al. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1530–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Kirchin MA, et al. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:559–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramgren B, Siemund R, Cronqvist M, Undrén P, Nilsson OG, Holtås S, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA. Neuroradiology 2008;50:947–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statementWe declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-chuan Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, L., He, Zh., Zhang, Xd., Lin, B., Yin, Xh., Sun, Xc. (2011). Value of Noninvasive Imaging in Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysm. In: Feng, H., Mao, Y., Zhang, J.H. (eds) Early Brain Injury or Cerebral Vasospasm. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 110/2. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0356-2_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0356-2_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0355-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0356-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics