Skip to main content

A Most Poisonous Debate: Legitimizing Support for Australian Private Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education

Abstract

School funding has always been a vexed matter in Australian political life; indeed wrangling over school funding in relation to government and private schooling was described back in 1977 as ‘Australia’s oldest, deepest, most poisonous debate’. Recently this ‘poisonous debate’ has been particularly potent. Helping to emphasise this point, in 2016 an extraordinary event happened—a national education minister of the conservative Liberal Government admitted on national television that some private schools in the nation are overfunded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some states, for example NSW, passed racial purity legislation (dismantled during the middle decades of the twentieth century) that permitted the formal exclusion of Indigenous children from public schools.

  2. 2.

    In addition to Catholic schools and high-fee schools there was also a tiny number of alternative or progressive private schools, founded upon specific pedagogical philosophies or systems (see http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/hindsight/free-to-learn---the-history-of-progressive/3319334; Cleverley 1978; Petersen 1970).

  3. 3.

    Australia’s Liberal Party is broadly equivalent to the British Conservative Party and when in government federally, governs in coalition with the smaller National Party, former known as the Country Party.

  4. 4.

    However, PISA 2015 results do indicate a remaining significant difference between Catholic and Independent schools, which was not seen in PISA 2009 or 2012, when all sectoral differences disappeared when socio-economic factors were taken into account (Thomson et al. 2016).

  5. 5.

    According to the OECD (2016, p. 215), ‘the strength of the socio-economic gradient refers to how well socio-economic status predicts performance’, while its slope ‘refers to the impact of socio-economic status on performance’. In the Australian case, this would indicate that while the association between socio-economic status and performance has not increased, the differences that do result from this disparity have.

References

  • Ashbolt, A. (2006, July 28). Labor’s education policy buried by an untrue tale. New Matilda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenden, D. (2016, September 28) Money, school and politics: Some FAQs. Inside Story. http://insidestory.org.au/money-schools-and-politics-some-faqs. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Schools, Australia 2015, ‘Table 31a Number of Schools by Affiliation, States and Territories, 2001–2015’, data cube: Excel spreadsheet, cat. no. 4221.0. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4221.02015?OpenDocument. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Australian Government. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: department of education, employment and workplace relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnor, C., & Shepherd, B. (2016a). School daze. https://cpd.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/School-Daze-4.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Bonnor, C., & Shepherd, B. (2016b). Uneven playing field: The state of Australia’s schools. http://cpd.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/The-State-of-Australias-Schools.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Browne, G. S. (Ed.). (1927). Education in Australia. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, P. (2012, August 27). Latham’s list was a hit in the polls. Inside Story. http://inside.org.au/lathams-list-was-a-hit-in-the-polls/print. Accessed 7 Jan 2013.

  • Campbell, C., & Proctor, H. (2014). A history of Australian schooling. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Sherington, G. (2013). The comprehensive public high school: Historical perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverley, J. (1978). A Commonwealth perspective. In J. Cleverley (Ed.), Half a million children (pp. 1–14). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R., Ashenden, D., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (2001). Making the Australian male: Middle-class masculinity 1870–1920. Melbourne: MUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J., & Vidovich, L. (1995). The politics of education: Commonwealth schools policy 1973-95. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2007). Challenging the system? A dramatic tale of neoliberal reform in an Australian high school. United States: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2008). No choice but to Choose: Selecting schools in Western Australia. In M. Forsey, S. Davies, & G. Walford (Eds.), The globalisation of school choice? (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2014). Beyond modernity? A aociological engagement with a short history of government funding for Australian schools. In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Educational heresies: New and enduring controversies over practice and policy. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski (Chair), D. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. www.schoolfundging.gov.au. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Gronn, P. (1992). Schooling for ruling. Australian Historical Studies, 25(98), 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, R. (1990, March 8). Policy speech. Brisbane. http://electionspeeches.moadoph.gov.au/speeches/1990-bob-hawke. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Hogan, M. (1978). The catholic campaign for state aid. Sydney: Catholic Theological Faculty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Schools Council of Australia. (2015). Independent schooling in Australia: Snapshot 2015. http://isca.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ISCA-Snapshot-2015.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2016.

  • Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. (1973). Schools in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practice’ and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), Pisa, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 117–140). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmel (Chair), P. (1973). Schools in Australia: Report of the interim committee of the Australian schools Commission. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, D. (1990). The Social production of merit: Education, psychology and politics in Australia 1900–1950. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalman, J. (1993). Journeyings: The biography of a middle-class generation 1920–1990. Melbourne: MUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nous Group. (2011). Schooling challenges and opportunities: A report for the review of funding for schooling panel. Melbourne: Melbourne Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Vol. 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264266490-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. C. (1970). Australian progressive schools. Australian Journal of Education, Part I: 13, 241–250; Part II: 14, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B. (1984). Residualization: what’s that? The Australian Teacher, 8, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B. (2013). The social make-up of schools: Family income, indigenous status, family type, religion and broadband access of students in government, catholic and other nongovernment schools. Canberra: Barbara Preston Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E. (2017). Middle-class school choice in urban spaces. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). PISA and the expanding role of the OECD in global educational governance. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), Pisa, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 185–206). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherington, G., & Hughes, (2014). ‘Money made US’: A short history of government funds for Australian schools. In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Educational heresies: New and enduring controversies over practice and policy. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherington, G., Petersen, R. C., & Brice, I. (1987). Learning to lead: A history of girls’ and boys’ corporate secondary schools in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M. (2016). The teacher ‘problem’: An analysis of the NSW education policy great teaching, inspired learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2016.1168778.

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2016). PISA 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M. (2015). Neglecting the evidence: Are we expecting too much from quality teaching? In H. Proctor, P. Brownlee, & B. Lingard (Eds.), Controversies in education: Orthodoxy and heresy in policy and practice (3rd ed., pp. 81–90). Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, J. (2012, July 8) 50 years since Australia’s most poisonous debate. Eureka Street. https://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=32230#.WFf11FN96M8. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.

  • Whitlam, E. (1972, November 13). Policy speech, Sydney. http://electionspeeches.moadoph.gov.au/speeches/1972-gough-whitlam. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.

  • Wilkinson, I., Caldwell, B., Selleck, R., Harris, J., & Dettman, P. (2006). A history of state aid to non-government schools in Australia. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, J. (2009). The limits of school choice: Some implications for accountability of selective practices and positional competition in Australian education. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, J. (2015). Making sense of school choice: politics, policies and practice under conditions of cultural diversity. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Forsey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsey, M., Proctor, H., Stacey, M. (2017). A Most Poisonous Debate: Legitimizing Support for Australian Private Schools. In: Koinzer, T., Nikolai, R., Waldow, F. (eds) Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17104-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17104-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17103-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17104-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics