Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of the brain can be performed with several coil types, depending on the design of the MRI unit and the information required. Traditionally, MRI examinations of the brain are performed with quadrature (i.e., circularly polarized) head coils. These volume coils are closely shaped around the head of the patient and usually present a so-called “bird-cage” configuration. Many coils are split in half, for easier patient access and positioning. Recently, phased-array head coils have become the standard of practice for state-of-the-art high-resolution MRI of the brain. Phased-array head coils contain multiple small coil elements, which are arranged in an integrated design which surrounds the head (e.g., 8-, 12- or even 32-channel head coils). Data from the individual coils are integrated by special software to compensate for the nonuniform distribution of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between the peripheral and central parts of the brain. The major advantage of a multichannel, phased-array head coil is that it allows the application of parallel acquisition techniques (PAT), which can be used to speed up MRI. The concept is to reduce the number of phase-encoding steps by switching a field gradient for each phase-encoding step. Skipping, for example, every second phase-encoding line accelerates the acquisition speed by a factor of two. This is called the acceleration or PAT factor. The trade-off for this increased imaging speed is a decrease in SNR. Image reconstruction with PAT techniques is more complicated, and several algorithms have been described, depending on whether image reconstruction takes place before (SMASH, GRAPPA (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition)) or after (SENSE) Fourier transform of the image data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (1994) Tumors of the central nervous system. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC
Atlas SW (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
Atlas SW (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Barkovich JA (2000) Pediatric neuroimaging, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Barkovich JA (2005) Pediatric neuroimaging, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Byrd SE, Darling CF, Wilczynski MA (1993) White matter of the brain: maturation and myelination magnetic resonance in infants and children. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 3: 247–266
Castillo M (1997) Prethrombolysis brain imaging: trends and controversies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1830–1833
Castillo M (guest ed) (1998) New techniques in MR neuroimaging. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 1998, vol 6. Saunders, Philadelphia
Castillo M (1998) New techniques in MR neuroimaging. In: Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, vol 6. Saunders, Philadelphia
Fazekas F, Ropele S, Enzinger C, Gorani F, Seewann A, Petrovic K, Schmidt R (2005) MTI of white matter hyperintensities. Brain 128:2926–2932
Finelli DA, Hurst GC, Gullapalli RP (1998) T1-W three dimensional magnetisation transfer MR of the brain: improved lesion contrast enhancement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19: 59–64
Forsting M, Wanke I (2008) Intracranial vascular malformations and aneurysms, from diagnostic work-up to endovascular therapy (2nd revised edition). Springer, New York
Gillard JH, Waldman AD, Barker PB (2005) Clinical MR neuroimaging. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gilman S (1998) Imaging the brain (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 338:812–820
Gilman S (1998) Imaging the brain (second of two parts). N Engl J Med 338:889–896
Hergan K, Schaefer PW, Sorensen AG, Gonzalez RG, Huisman TA (2002) Diffusion-weighted MRI in diffuse axonal injury of the brain. Eur Radiol 12:2536–2541
Hartmann M, Jansen O, Heiland S, Sommer C, Münkel K, Sartor K (2001) Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1738–1742
Hoang TA, Hasso AN (1994) Intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 4:823–847
Jack CR (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging: neuroimaging and anatomy. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 5:597–622
Lacerda S, Law M (2009) Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 19:527–557
Law M (2009) Advanced imaging techniques in brain tumors. Cancer Imaging 9(special issue A):S4–S9
Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, Peccerelli N, Chheang S, Gruber ML, Miller DC, Golfinos JG, Zagzag D, Johnson G (2008) Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 247:490–498
Lee SH, Rao KCVG, Zimmerman RA (1992) Cranial MRI and CT, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lee SH, Rao KCVG, Zimmerman RA (2004) Cranial MRI and CT, 4th edn. McGraw-Hil, New York
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC, Lyon
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109
Lufkin RB (1998) The MRI manual, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127
Osborn AG (1994) Diagnostic neuroradiology. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis
Osborn AG (2004) Diagnostic imaging – brain. Amirsys, Salt Lake City
Parizel PM, Van Goethem JW, Özsarlak Ö, Maes M, Philips CD (2005) New developments in the neuroradiological diagnosis of craniocerebral trauma. Eur Radiol 15:569–581
Pierallini A, Caramia F, Falcone C, Tinelli E, Paonessa A, Ciddio AB, Fiorelli M, Bianco F, Natalizi S, Ferrante L, Bozzao L (2006) Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging – initial experience. Radiology 239:223–231
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58:840–846
Provenzale JM, Mukundan S, Barboriak DP (2006) Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response. Radiology 239:632–649
Sahraian MA, Radue E-W (2007) MRI atlas of MS lesions. Springer, Berlin
Simon JH, Li D, Traboulsee A, Coyle PK, Arnold DL, Barkhof F, Frank JA, Grossman R, Paty DW, Radue EW, Wolinsky JS (2006) Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:455–461
Sorensen AG, Reimer P (2000) Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: principles and current applications. Thieme, Stuttgart
van der Knaap MS, Valk J (1995) Magnetic resonance of myelin; myelination and myelin disorders. Springer, Berlin
van der Knaap MS, Valk J (2005) Magnetic resonance of myelin; myelination and myelin disorders, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parizel, P.M. et al. (2010). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain. In: Reimer, P., Parizel, P.M., Meaney, J.F.M., Stichnoth, F.A. (eds) Clinical MR Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74504-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74504-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74501-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74504-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)