Abstract
Previous reviews have described services for offenders with mental disorder in several European countries, but we wanted to understand how these might apply in an individual case. We used process mapping to record pathways taken through the legal process and other services by offenders suspected of having committed a homicide in four EU countries—Austria, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK. All have the facility to meet some urgent mental health needs at any point in the criminal justice pathway, but countries differ in when evidence on the relevance of mental disorder to the offence may be introduced into the legal process. All countries provide some sort of specialist health service, but the nature of its administration and its placement differs. Austria’s specialist inpatient services are provided entirely within the prison system, the Netherlands in either the Joint Departments of Health and Justice TBS system or prison hospital units. In Finland and the UK, inpatient services are all health service based and clinical input to prisons by health service employees only. Development of offender pathway maps is likely to assist mutual understanding of services. They could be used to inform patients, relatives and victims about what they may expect of the months and years which follow first involvement with the criminal justice system. They may help us to learn from each other’s similarities and differences what works best.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Taylor PJ, Dunn E, Felthous AR, Gangé P, Harding T, Kalski S, Kramp P, Lindqvist P, Nedopil N, Ogloff JRP, Skipworth J, Thomson L, Yozhikawa K. Forensic psychiatry and its interfaces outside the UK and Ireland. In: Gunn J, Taylor PJ, editors. Forensic psychiatry, clinical, legal and ethical issues. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. p. 111–47.
Gunn J, Mevis P. Adversarial versus inquisitorial legal systems. In: Goethals K, editor. Forensic psychiatry and psychology in Europe: a cross-border study guide. Cham: Springer; this volume.
Nedopil N, Taylor PJ. Specialist training in forensic psychiatry in Europe. In: Goethals K, editor. Forensic psychiatry and psychology in Europe: a cross-border study guide. Cham: Springer; 2018.
Gunn J, Nedopil N. Editorial: European Training in Forensic Psychiatry. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2005;15:207–13.
Hillier B, Lambourne C, Larsen TG. Mapping offender-patient pathways in the different jurisdictions of the European Union. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22:293–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1842.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Process mapping—an overview. London: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2008. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121108100808/http:/www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/process_mapping_-_an_overview.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
Schanda H, Ortwein-Swoboda G, Knecht G, et al. The situation of forensic psychiatry in Austria. Setback or progress? Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000;23:481–92.
Seppänen A, Eronen M. Mental health law in Finland. Int Psychiatry. 2012;9:91–3.
Putkonen H, Völlm B. Compulsory psychiatric detention in Finland. Psychiatr Bull. 2007;31:101–3. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.106.009472.
WHO. ICD-10 classifications of mental and behavioural disorder: clinical descriptions and disgnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author APA.
Patana P. Mental Health Analysis Profiles (MhAPs): Finland. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 72, OECD Publishing; 2014.
Eronen M, Repo E, Vartiainen H, Tiihonen J. Forensic Psychiatric Organization in Finland. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000;23:541–6.
Edworthy R, Sampson S, Völlm B. Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;47:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.027.
Forti A, Nas C, van Geldrop A, Franx G et al. Mental Health Analysis Profiles (MhAPs): Netherlands, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 73, OECD Publishing, Paris; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz158z60dzn-en. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
van Marle H. The Dutch Entrustment Act (TBS): its principles and innovations. Int J Forensic Mental Health. 2002;1:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2002.10471163.
Council for the Administration of Criminal Justice and Protection of Juveniles. Proper Treatment. Council for the Administration of Criminal Justice and Protection of Juveniles: The Hague. 2012. https://www.rsj.nl/binaries/proper-treatment_tcm26-26302.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Report to the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on the visit to the Netherlands carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Council of Europe: Strasbourg; 2012. http://www.cpt.coe.int/documents/nld/2012-21-inf-eng.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
Pham T, Taylor P. The roles of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists: professional experts, service providers, therapists, or all things for all people? In: Goethals K, editor. Forensic psychiatry and psychology in Europe: a cross-border study guide. Cham: Springer; this volume.
Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen. Masterplan DJI 2013-2018. [Masterplan Custodial Institutions Agency 2013-2018], Ministry of Security and Justice; 2013.
Mental Health Act. (as amended) Mental Health Act 2007. London: The Stationary Office; 1983.
Criminal Justice Act. London: The Stationary Office; 2003.
Independent Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS in England. Mental Health Five Year Forward View. London: The Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS: London, England; 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mental-Health-Taskforce-FYFV-final.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
van den Anker L, Dalhuisen L, Stokkel M. Fitness to stand trial: a general principle of European Criminal Law? Utrecht Law Rev. 2011;7:120–36. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1950120. Accessed 31 Jan 2017.
Yakeley J, Taylor R, Cameron A. MAPPA and mental health—10 years of controversy. Psychiatrist. 2012;36:201–4. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.111.037960.
Jamieson L, Taylor PJ, Gibson B. From pathological dependence to healthy independent living: an emergent grounded theory of facilitating independent living. Grounded Theory Rev. 2006;6:79–107.
Taylor PJ, Graf M, Schanda H, Völlm B. The treating psychiatrist as expert in the courts: is it necessary or possible to separate the roles of physician and expert? Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22:271–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1843.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the following clinicians for the original interview data and for patient guidance in subsequent drafts: Dr. Alexander Dvorak, Consultant Psychiatrist, Ministry Of Justice Justizanstalt Göllersdorf, Austria; Dr. Allan Seppanen, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and Clinical Director, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland; and Dr. Ellen van Lier and Dr. Hans Hulsbos, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrists, Penitentiary Institution Vught, the Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Briefing Note: Preparatory Questions for Care Pathway Interviews
Appendix: Briefing Note: Preparatory Questions for Care Pathway Interviews
1.1 Introduction
This briefing note will prepare you for the care pathway interviews we will be conducting at the conference. We have listed key questions below which are broken down into stages. This should support a detailed discussion during interview and encourage some reflection in advance. Our intention is to clearly and visually describe the care pathway for mentally disordered offenders in a range of countries. This builds on work already completed for both Denmark and the UK (Danish Pathway attached for reference). You will be involved in the review and approval of the relevant pathway(s) once completed.
We would like to thank you for your time and contribution to this work.
1.2 The Case Study
We would like to use the following scenario to explore the questions below.
The police are called by a neighbour to a residential property where there has been a serious disturbance. The police attend the scene and find a man who has stabbed his wife multiple times. The wife is dead and the man is in a highly agitated state.
1.3 Care Pathway Interview Questions
1.3.1 Arrest
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
Arrest | What happens at the scene of the crime if? i. the police do not suspect any mental health issues? ii. the police do suspect mental health issues? | Consider who is contacted at this point by who. Where the suspect is taken to (e.g. police station/hospital/other) |
Arrest | What assessment will be done by who at this stage? | Consider capacity, fitness to be interviewed, etc. |
Arrest | Assuming there is a mental health concern following assessment, what would happen next? | Where is the person held? Who is responsible for him? What legal framework is detention under at this time and who decides this? Is this the Court, Police, Judge, Psychiatrist/Doctor, Minister? |
1.3.2 First Court Hearing
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
First court hearing | At the first court appearance, which court in your legal system would this be? | Are there specialist mental health courts available? Who would bring this action? i.e. police, state, private, other? |
First court hearing | Does the accused have to make a plea at this stage? | What are the available pleas? |
First court hearing | Would a psychiatrist be present? | How are psychiatrists appointed? What will they be asked to advise the court on? What are the limits of their authority at this stage? |
First court hearing | Who raises concerns on mental health in the court setting? | Is this a lawyer, judge, magistrate? |
First court hearing | Assuming it is deemed that the person had an active psychotic illness, what would happen next? | Where is the person held? Who is responsible for him? What legal framework is detention under at this time and who decides this? This may be Court, Police, Judge, Psychiatrist/Doctor, Minister, etc. What is needed to make this order and who carries it out? Are there logistical/practical considerations here, e.g. bed availability? |
1.3.3 Care/Detention Provided in Interim Period
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
Care/detention | What (mental) healthcare services are available to the accused during detention? | What level of psychiatric input is available during this period and in what setting? How long might this period be? Is there any interaction with the court in this period? |
1.3.4 Trial
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
Trial | Are there circumstances where the defendant would not reach the trial stage? | What is the threshold for this? At what stage could this occur and who would authorise this via which legal framework? |
Trial | What kind of trial would take place in what type of court? | Who would represent the suspect, what type of court would this take place in? What input would psychiatric services have in this process? Are there special psychiatric defences and are they absolute? |
Trial | Assuming there is no dispute on the facts, and the offence is psychotically driven, what would happen to the defendant? | (Where is the person held? Who is responsible for him? What legal framework is detention under at this time and who decides this? This may be Court, Police, Judge, Psychiatrist/Doctor, Minister, etc. What is needed to make this order and who carries it out? Are there logistical/practical considerations here, e.g. bed availability, etc.? Does the judge have the ability to override psychiatric opinion? |
1.3.5 Post-trial Assessment
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
Post-trial assessment | What type(s) of assessment(s) would be done following conviction to review the mental state of the defendant? | Is this to inform sentencing or simply a legal requirement to assess periodically? Who will be the recipient of the assessments? Is the defendant able to challenge these assessments? |
1.3.6 Transfer or Discharge
Stage | Question | Things to think about |
---|---|---|
Transfer or discharge | What are the circumstances in which the defendant can be transferred or discharged from one setting to another (e.g. prison to hospital)? | Can they be discharged to the community from hospital, or transferred to prison? Who would make this decision? How often might this be reviewed? Can defendants be transferred from prison into the hospital/psychiatric system following a mental health concern? |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hillier, B., Lambourne, C., Taylor, P. (2018). Mapping Offender-Patient Pathways. In: Goethals, K. (eds) Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74662-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74664-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)