Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Stone Disease in South America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urolithiasis

Abstract

The authors provide an overview of the underlying causes of urolithiasis, rates of metabolic disturbances, stone and demographic characteristics, geographic and seasonal variations, dietary patterns, types of treatment, and approximate costs of stone disease in South America, based on the available data from Brazil and other countries. They conclude that metabolic abnormalities can be found in up to 98 % of stone formers, hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia, and hyperuricosuria being the most common ones. The number of hospital admissions due to urinary stone disease was higher during the summer and in areas of hot and dry weather. Most of the calculi were composed of calcium oxalate. At present, open surgical procedures were substituted for endoscopic and percutaneous procedures, and there is a trend for a continuous increase in the use of flexible devices. The cost of stone disease care is still estimated to be high, but the continuous increase in the access to medical assistance by the population will help to reduce its socioeconomic impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DATASUS. Department of Informatics of SUS. Brasília: Health Ministery; 2011 [cited 2011 03/12/2011]. Available from:http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php. Accessed on March 12, 2011

  2. Heilberg IP. Update on dietary recommendations and medical treatment of renal stone disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15(1):117–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pak CY, Resnick MI, Preminger GM. Ethnic and geographic diversity of stone disease. Urology. 1997;50(4):504–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heilberg IP, Schor N. Renal stone disease: causes, evaluation and medical treatment. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50(4):823–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Almeida WS, Schor N. Epidemiological and metabolic evaluation in renal stone patients living in a specific region of Brazil. Int Braz J Urol. 2001;27(5):432–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amaro CR, Goldberg J, Amaro JL, Padovani CR. Metabolic assessment in patients with urinary lithiasis. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(1):29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giugliani R, Ferrari I. Metabolic factors in urolithiasis: a study in Brazil. J Urol. 1980;124(4):503–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giugliani R, Ferrari I, Greene LJ. Frequency of cystinuria among stone-forming patients in region of Brazil. Urology. 1986;27(1):38–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vannucchi MTI, Geleilete TJM, Bessa EL. Urolithiasisin public health services – aprevention protocol for outpatients. J Bras Nefrol. 2003;25(4):165–71.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heilberg IP, Teixeira SH, Novoa CG, Barros E, Ferreira Filho SR, Melo MEA, et al. The Brazilian multicentric study of nephrolithiasis (MULTILIT). In: Pak CYC, Resnick MI, Preminger GM, editors. Urolithiasis 1996 – proceedings of the 8th international symposium on urolithiasis. Dallas: Millet the Printer; 1996. p. 498–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. del Valle E, Spivacow R, Zanchetta JR. Metabolic changes in 2612 patients with nephrolithiasis. Medicina (B Aires). 1999;59(5 Pt 1):417–22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ventura J, Fernandez J, Gauronas W, Szpinak B, Olaizola I, Zampedri L, et al. Uruguai. In: Schor N, Heilberg IP, editors. Calculose renal – fisiopatologia, diagnóstico e tratamento. São Paulo: Sarvier Ltda; 1995. p. 350–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weisinger JR, Bellorin-Font E, Sylvia V, Hum-Pierres J, Paz-Martinez V. An ambulatory metabolic study of calcium urolithiasis in Venezuela. In: Schuville PO, editor. Urolithiasis and related clinical research. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. p. 275–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Amaro CR, Goldberg J, Agostinho AD, Damasio P, Kawano PR, Fugita OE, et al. Metabolic investigation of patients with staghorn calculus: is it necessary? Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35(6):658–61. discussion 62–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. da Silva SF, Silva SL, Daher EF, Silva Junior GB, Mota RM, da Silva CA B. Determination of urinary stone composition based on stone morphology: a prospective study of 325 consecutive patients in an emerging country. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(5):561–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Negri AL, Spivacow FR, Del Valle EE, Forrester M, Rosende G, Pinduli I. Role of overweight and obesity on the urinary excretion of promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in stone formers. Urol Res. 2008;36(6):303–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Curhan GC. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):287–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão – Governo Federal do Brasil; 2010. Available from:http://www1.ibge.gov.br/home/.Accessed on Feb. 28, 2011

  19. Fakheri RJ, Goldfarb DS. Ambient temperature as a contributor to kidney stone formation: implications of global warming. Kidney Int. 2011;79(11):1178–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soucie JM, Coates RJ, McClellan W, Austin H, Thun M. Relation between geographic variability in kidney stones prevalence and risk factors for stones. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(5):487–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandel NS, Mandel GS. Urinary tract stone disease in the united states veteran population. I. Geographical frequency of occurrence. J Urol. 1989;142(6):1513–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173(3):848–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucio II JS, Korkes F, Lopes-Neto AC, Silva EG, Mattos MHE, Pompeo ACL. Steinstrasse predictive factors and outcomes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37(4):477–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Korkes F, Lopes-Neto AC, Mattos MH, Pompeo AC, Wroclawski ER. Patient position and semi-rigid ureteroscopy outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35(5):542–7. discussion 8–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M. Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy of impacted ureteral calculi. Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32(3):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lotan Y. Economics and cost of care of stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009;16(1):5–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ita Pfeferman Heilberg M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Korkes, F., Schor, N., Heilberg, I.P. (2012). Epidemiology of Stone Disease in South America. In: Talati, J., Tiselius, HG., Albala, D., YE, Z. (eds) Urolithiasis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4383-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4387-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics