The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

F ragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading cause of inherited mental retardation, but typically carriers of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) premutation are unaffected cognitively early in life. 1 Premutation alleles in fragile X are defined by a CGG trinucleotide expansion between 55 and 200 repeats located in the 5’ untranslated region (5’ UTR) of the gene. The premutation occurs in 1/813 men and 1/259 women in the general population. 2 , 3 A recent prevalence study found that approximately 17% of carrier men in their 50s will develop FXTAS, but this number increases with age, with an estimated 75% of male carriers in their 80s presenting with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). 4 FXTAS occurs far less frequently in women. 5

The discovery of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) premutation in a subgroup of older male carriers has drawn attention to the clinical involvement of the carrier later in life. This neurological syndrome, characterized by progressive intention tremor, ataxia, cognitive decline, and generalized brain atrophy, is specifically seen in individuals with the FMR1 premutation allele typically after 50 years of age. 6 , 7 Additionally, patients may have features of parkinsonism, peripheral neuropathy, lower limb muscle weakness, and autonomic dysfunction. The diagnostic criteria for FXTAS are listed in Table 1 .

TABLE 1. FXTAS Proposed Diagnostic Criteria
TABLE 1. FXTAS Proposed Diagnostic Criteria
Enlarge table

Though our knowledge of the cognitive decline in FXTAS is limited, a certain pattern of impairment has been seen from neuropsychological assessments performed on individuals with FXTAS. Short term memory and executive function deficits are identified initially and some patients progress to clinically evident dementia. 8 Deficits in cognitive functioning may be associated with psychiatric symptoms including anxiety, irritability, mood lability, and impulsive behavior, as is seen with other dementia syndromes.

The molecular basis of FXTAS is thought to be the elevated FMR1 mRNA observed in peripheral blood leukocytes of premutation carriers. 9 The FMR1 mRNA levels are elevated two- to 10-fold, possibly because of impaired translation of the expanded CGG-repeat mRNA with a consequent increase in transcriptional activity. 10 The elevated FMR1 mRNA is thought to produce a toxic gain of function effect whereby proteins that are important for neuronal cell function bind excessively to the expanded CGG repeat and are sequestered. 11 In patients with FXTAS, inclusions subsequently form in the nucleus of the neurons and astrocytes, which results in neural cell loss, particularly of Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. 12 Cortical atrophy and white matter disease are seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with FXTAS; in addition, over half of the patients show increased signal intensity on T2 weighted images within the middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP sign) and white matter of the cerebellum adjacent to the dentate nuclei ( Figure 1 ). 13

FIGURE 1. Axial 5 mm Thick T2-Weighted Image Through Posterior Fossa of a Patient (separate from subject) with FXTAS Established on Presence of Premutation, Tremor, Ataxia, and Impaired Executive Function

There is mild bilateral thinning of the middle cerebellar peduncles (arrows), demonstrating increased signal intensity. The alteration extended into deep white matter of the cerebellum.

CASE REPORT

In 2001, a 65-year-old white man with the fragile X premutation (98 CGG repeats) was reported for his neurological symptoms, including tremor and ataxia. 14 The onset of upper extremity tremor was estimated to have begun at age 54. Four years later, the tremor having worsened, he had to retire from his job as an electrician, a career at which he had been highly skilled and successful. Subsequently, the tremor intensified, impairing his activities of daily living (ADLs) and forcing him to rely on others regularly for assistance. He also experienced several falls from postural instability. He was treated with amantadine, which briefly improved his postural status but did not affect his tremors.

He had been married for 30 years and had three adult children with normal intellectual abilities and two grandchildren with fragile X syndrome, through whom his premutation was identified. He also had a brother with mental retardation and fragile X syndrome. In addition, there was a history of likely dementia in his father and Parkinson’s disease in his grandfather. His birth and early development were unremarkable: he functioned well in school, was a high school graduate with 2 years of college education, and then received electrician training, during which he was characterized as a “star pupil.” He had no history of alcoholism. Medical history included hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. He was also receiving lisinopril, carbidopa/ l -dopa, and lovastatin.

His psychiatric symptoms included slowness in initiation and completion of simple tasks, excessive sleep with daytime naps, fatigue, low levels of energy, poor concentration, and decreased psychomotor movements. His spouse reported that he had an irritably depressed mood, but the patient denied feeling depressed or sad and there were no clear reports of anhedonia. He had no history of psychosis or suicidal behavior. He had been diagnosed with cognitive symptoms, with notable poor memory for recent events and the names of familiar people, which became apparent several years after the onset of his tremors. An MRI in 2000 showed dilated lateral ventricles and cortical atrophy ( Figure 2 ). He had been started on donepezil 5 mg qd in 2001 without dramatic effect. This led to his referral for psychiatric evaluation in 2002.

FIGURE 2. Coronal T1-Weighted Image Demonstrating Enlargement of Lateral Ventricles and Subarachnoid Spaces over Cerebral and Cerebellar Convexities

Genetic testing revealed an expansion of 98 CGG repeats, an elevated FMR1 mRNA level (3.4 [SD=0.48] times above normal), and that FMR1 protein was reduced to 69%. Formal neuropsychological testing accomplished in 2000 revealed a Verbal IQ of 93, a Performance IQ of 73, and a Full Scale IQ of 83. Verbal comprehension was 100, perceptual organization was 78, working memory was 80, and processing speed was 71. His executive cognitive function was severely impaired, with a score of 3 on the Behavior Dyscontrol Scale (BDS), 16 and a score of 6 (normal score being 39 [SD=9.8]) on the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). 16 Verbal fluency and processing speed also were impaired substantially, with a score of 28 on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT-1) 17 and a score of 8 on the Animal Naming subtest of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). 18 During the testing, he demonstrated notable disinhibition and distractibility, inappropriate joking, poor frustration tolerance, and perseverative thinking. A more detailed neurocognitive assessment was reported in Grigsby et al. 19

Psychiatric examination revealed notable psychomotor slowing, blunted affect with occasional smiling, and coherent thought process, albeit with some perseveration. There was notably long latency of verbal responses. Similarities and proverbs were interpreted concretely and in a somewhat idiosyncratic fashion. His knowledge of historical events was fair, but he exhibited some disinhibition (e.g., making disrespectful comments about various historical figures in an inappropriately jovial way) and lacked detailed understanding. There were no signs of suicidal or homicidal ideation and no evidence of psychosis. His tremors, discussed above, were evident throughout the psychiatric examination. Because of these tremors, writing and drawing tasks could not be accomplished on formal cognitive testing. His Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 24, with decrements in short-term memory (only one of the three elements was recalled correctly) and time orientation (four of the give time elements were correct). Psychiatric diagnosis was dementia secondary to FXTAS.

Donepezil dosage was increased to 10 mg qd. Upon follow-up 4 weeks later, his spouse reported greater cognitive accuracy and improved memory. A repeated MMSE was 26, with improved short-term recall of two of three elements. He had less latency of verbal response. A Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) revealed a score of 3. His decreased psychomotor movements and spousal reports of recent irritability resulted in the administration of venlafaxine 37.5 mg XR qd. Within one month of combined therapy, he was less irritable and more attentive in conversation, had improved sleep and energy, and was showing better memory function in ADLs. He continued to deny depressed mood. Reexamination revealed increasingly spontaneous speech, less blunted affect, and an improved MMSE to 27, with short-term recall still at two of three elements. He continued on venlafaxine and donepezil. In subsequent months, he experienced brief episodes consistent with disturbed reality testing. On one occasion, he awoke at night and asked, “Where is my gun?”; on another occasion he expressed the belief that he “had to go to work.” Risperidone 0.5 mg po qhs PRN was prescribed thereafter but was taken infrequently.

Within the next 6 months, his neurologist discontinued carbidopa/l-dopa and prescribed amantadine. One year after his initial psychiatric evaluation, his MMSE was stable at 27 with two of three elements on short-term recall and his mood symptoms remained improved. This emotional and cognitive stability was noted despite significant increase in his tremor in the interceding months.

A complete neurological examination in 2003 revealed worsened tremors, ataxia, and parkinsonism. Cranial nerve examination revealed hypomimia (reduced facial expression), hypophonia (monotonous speech with some nasal quality), saccadic pursuit eye movements, and bilateral hearing impairment. Motor examination revealed a 4–6 Hz high amplitude postural tremor, which affected his upper extremities bilaterally; an intermittent resting tremor of the right thumb and index finger; and moderate to severe rigidity with some cogwheeling, which affected both upper extremities but was more pronounced on the left. He had bradyteleokinesia on finger-to-nose testing bilaterally. As a consequence, his handwriting was large, tremulous, and illegible. In addition, he was dysdiadochokinetic on fast alternating movements of hands and fingers, ataxic on heel-to-shin maneuvers, and he demonstrated a broad-based gait with mild propulsion and moderate hesitation. His deep tendon reflexes were hyporeflexic in all extremities, and his plantar responses were flexor bilaterally. On sensory examination, he had significant vibratory loss in the great toes bilaterally. Interestingly, however, his position sense was preserved in his lower extremities.

Regarding parkinsonism, he was tested based on the motor component of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) 20 at each clinic visit. The motor component of UPDRS comprises 14 items dealing with the subject’s speech, facial expression, tremor, rigidity, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. It provides a numeric score for an objective measurement of the subject’s motor functions, with zero being completely normal and 56 the worst possible. Our subject scored 35 at his most recent visit in 2004, a 12 point decrement within 1 year, signaling significant deterioration of his overall motor capacity.

According to his neurologist, who conducted a follow-up visit in 2004, his ataxia had deteriorated to the point that he needed a wheelchair or walker much of the time. His tremors had increased in severity, rendering him unable to complete the Fingertapping Test and the Purdue Pegboard Test upon examination. He had been treated with primidone for tremors, which initially had been helpful but by this follow-up visit was less effective.

DISCUSSION

This is the first case report in the psychiatric literature of FXTAS, which appears to be a relatively common cause of tremor and ataxia among older men in the general population (approximately 1 per 3,000). 4 A recent prevalence study of families with FXS in California demonstrated that 17% of men with the premutation in their 50s, 38% in their 60s, 47% in their 70s, and 75% in their 80s develop FXTAS. 4 This case represents a constellation of neurological, psychiatric, and MRI findings that are characteristic of the recently described FXTAS in grandfathers of subjects with fragile X syndrome.

Anecdotal case reports of patients with FXTAS detail psychiatric symptoms including anxiety, mood lability, irritability, and reclusive social behavior. These symptoms may be secondary to the cognitive impairments or may be primary to the pathological process of FXTAS. The region of the brain with the highest percentage of inclusions in neurons and astrocytes is the hippocampus. 12 Psychiatric symptoms may be primary and related to limbic dysfunction. 21 Executive function deficits, often associated with impulsive behavior and inappropriate verbalizations, are also presenting signs, along with the tremor and ataxia. 7 , 8 We have seen dementia in approximately 20% of patients with FXTAS, but longitudinal studies that may increase the percentage over time have not been performed. 8

The MRI usually reveals cortical atrophy, ventricular enlargement, and periventricular white matter increased signal intensity on T2 weighted images, which is presumably secondary to demyelination and gliosis associated with neuronal cell death. In addition, white matter disease is present in the middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP) in over 50% of patients, although this was not seen in the current case ( Figure 2 ).

The patient presented a pattern of psychiatric symptoms consistent with both subcortical and cortical (primarily frontal lobe) dementia. Consistent with subcortical pathology (as is often seen with Parkinson’s dementia and vascular dementia) were his cognitive slowness, poor retrieval memory, and associated mood symptoms that were subsyndromal for a major depressive episode, including variably depressed mood, energy disturbance, decreased psychomotor movements, and sleep disturbance. 22 Symptoms consistent with a deteriorating frontal lobe process were his behavioral disinhibition, poor social judgment, task impersistence, and poor ability to initiate activity, despite a relatively preserved MMSE score. His symptoms improved incrementally with treatment with an antidepressant, making speculative the specific syndromal attribution of depression “versus” dementia and the precise relative contributions of the cholinesterase inhibitor and antidepressant to his clinical condition.

While the neuropsychiatric phenomenology of this syndrome awaits full descriptive study, it is a reasonable assumption that the natural history of this degenerative condition would include linear decline in cognitive function, as is seen with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT). This stands in contrast to some other dementia syndromes, such as vascular dementia, where episodes of cognitive decline may be interspersed with periods of relative cognitive preservation, so that a patient’s decline is experienced as more “stepwise.” 22 While it is as yet unclear if the rate of cognitive decline in this syndrome would be a loss of 2 to 4 MMSE points/year (as in untreated DAT), this rate may have utility as a clinical benchmark of expected decline pending the completion of the necessary longitudinal studies to elucidate the natural history of the untreated condition. 22

This patient was treated for 3 years with donepezil, an FDA-approved cholinesterase inhibitor to treat dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. 23 Since their introduction, cholinesterase inhibitors have been used “off-label” for other dementia syndromes (e.g., vascular dementia, Parkinson’s disease with dementia, and Lewy body dementia). 2431 The patient tolerated donepezil without apparent side effects, showed modest cognitive improvement, and then maintained a relatively stable MMSE during 2 years of psychiatric treatment, when he otherwise may have been expected to lose cognitive function. This point remains, of course, somewhat speculative and needs to be validated by properly designed prospective studies.

Anxiety is a symptom that can be present often in premutation carriers even before the onset of FXTAS; typically, carriers with anxiety do well with a selective serotinin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). 32 , 33 The norepinephrine enhancement of venlafaxine may be beneficial for the attentional problems related to the executive function deficits in FXTAS. In addition, the patient experienced several mood symptoms (e.g., excess sleep, low level of energy, irritability, and lability) in addition to symptoms better understood as fundamentally “cognitive.” It is common psychiatric practice to use adjunctive antidepressant treatment with pharmacotherapy of dementia for concurrent mood and cognitive symptoms. 3437 While this patient never met clinical criteria for major depressive disorder during the 2 years of psychiatric treatment, he did appear to experience mood symptoms that affected his already compromised cognitive function. He tolerated venlafaxine without problematic side effects and experienced improved cognitive and behavioral functioning.

Further studies of helpful medications in FXTAS are warranted since this disorder is common. We also urge DNA testing for the FMR1 premutation in patients who present with dementia and psychiatric symptoms, in addition to tremor and/or ataxia.

FIGURE 3. Axial Inversion Recovery Image Showing Increased Signal Intensity in Subependymal and Deep Frontal White Matter Adjacent to Lateral Ventricles
FIGURE 4. T2-Weighted Image Through Posterior Fossa Demonstrating Normal Signal Intensity in Middle Cerebellar Peduncles and Deep White Matter of the Cerebellum

Received April 20, 2004; revised August 4, 2004; accepted May 6, 2005. From the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Radiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Neurology, and Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, California; and the M.I.N.D. Institute, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, California. Address correspondence to Dr. Bourgeois, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2230 Stockton Blvd., Sacramento CA 95817; [email protected] (E-mail).

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

References

1. Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ: The fragile X premutation: into the phenotypic fold. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12:278–283Google Scholar

2. Rousseau F, Rouillard P, Morel ML, et al: Prevalence of carriers of premutation-size alleles of the FMR1 gene—and implications for the population genetics of the fragile X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 57(5):1006–1018Google Scholar

3. Dombrowski C, Levesque S, Morel ML, et al: Premutation and intermediate-size FMR1 alleles in 10,572 males from the general population: loss of an AGG interruption is a late event in the generation of fragile X syndrome alleles. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11(4):371–378Google Scholar

4. Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey MA, et al: Penetrance of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in a premutation carrier population: initial results from a California family-based study. J Am Med Assoc 2004; 291:460–469Google Scholar

5. Hagerman RJ, Leavitt BR, Farain F, et al: Fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in females with the FMR1 premutation. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 4(5):1051–1056Google Scholar

6. Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, et al: Intention tremor, Parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 2001; 57:127–130Google Scholar

7. Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, et al: Fragile X premutation tremor/ataxia syndrome: molecular, clinical, and neuroimaging correlates. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:869–878Google Scholar

8. Jacquemont S, Farzin F, Hall D, et al: Aging in individuals with the FMR1 mutation. Am J Ment Retard 2004; 109(2):154–164Google Scholar

9. Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, et al: Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in fragile X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66:6–15Google Scholar

10. Primerano B, Tassone F, Hagerman, et al: Reduced FMR1 mRNA translation efficiency in Fragile X patients with premutations. RNA 2002; 8:1482–1488Google Scholar

11. Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ: The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74:805–816Google Scholar

12. Greco C, Hagerman RJ, Tassone F, et al: Neuronal intranuclear inclusions in a new cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome among fragile X carriers. Brain 2002; 125(8):1760–1771Google Scholar

13. Brunberg JA, Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, et al: Fragile X premutation carriers: characteristic MR imaging findings of adult male patients with progressive cerebellar and cognitive dysfunction. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23(10):1757–1766Google Scholar

14. Hagerman RJ, Greco C, Chudley A, et al. Neuropathology and neurodegenerative features in some older male premutation carriers of Fragile X Syndrome, in 10th International Workshop on Fragile X Syndrome and X Linked Mental Retardation, 2001. Frascati, Italy, Sept 19–22Google Scholar

15. Grigsby J, Kaye K, Robbins LJ: Reliabilities, norms and factor structure of the behavioral dyscontrol scale. Percept Mot Skills 1992; 74:883–892Google Scholar

16. Spreen O, Benton AL: Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA), Rev. ed. Victoria, University of Victoria Neuropsychology Laboratory, 1977Google Scholar

17. Smith A: The symbol digit modalities test: a neuropsychological test for economic screening of learning and other cerebral disorders. Learn Disord 1968; 3:83–91Google Scholar

18. Goodglass H, Kaplan E: Assessment of aphasia and related disorders, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1983Google Scholar

19. Grigsby J, Leehey MA, Jacquemont S, et al: Cognitive Impairment in a 65-Year-Old Male with Fragile X-Associated Tremor-Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS). Cogn Behav Neurol, in pressGoogle Scholar

20. Fahn S, Elton RL, UPDRS Development Committee: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, in Recent developments in Parkinson’s Disease. Edited by S. Fahn, Elton RL, UPDRS Development Committee. Florham Park, NJ, Macmillan Health Care Information, 1987, pp 153–164Google Scholar

21. Hessl D, Tassone F, Loesch DZ, et al: Abnormal elevation of fMRI mRNA is associated with psychological symptoms in individuals with the fragile X premutation. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2005; 139B:115-121Google Scholar

22. Doraiswamy PM, Steffens DC, Pitchumoni S, et al: Early recognition of Alzheimer’s disease: What is consensual? What is controversial? What is practical? J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(suppl 13):6–18Google Scholar

23. Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al: A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1998; 50:136–145Google Scholar

24. Werber EA, Rabey JM: The beneficial effect of cholinesterase inhibitors on patients suffering from parkinson’s disease and dementia. J Neural Transm 2001; 108:1319–1325Google Scholar

25. Mendez MF, Younesi FL, Perryman KM: Use of donepezil for vascular dementia: preliminary clinical experience. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999; 11:268–270Google Scholar

26. Li Y, Meyer JS, Haque MA, et al: Feasibility of vascular dementia treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 17:193–196Google Scholar

27. Kumar V, Anand R, Messina J, et al: An efficacy and safety analysis of exelon in Alzheimer’s disease patients with concurrent vascular risk factors. Eur J Neurol 2000; 7:159–169Google Scholar

28. Hutchinson M, Fazzini E: Cholinesterase inhibition and Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 61:324–325Google Scholar

29. Geizer M, Ancill RJ: Combination of risperidone and donepezil in Lewy body dementia. Can J Psychiatry 1998; 43:421–422Google Scholar

30. Aarsland D, Bronnick K, Karlsen K: Donepezil for dementia with Lewy bodies: a case study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999; 14:69–74Google Scholar

31. McKeith IG, Grace JB, Walker Z, et al: Rivastigmine in the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies: preliminary findings from an open trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15:387–392Google Scholar

32. Hagerman RJ et al: A survey of fluoxetine therapy in fragile X syndrome. Dev Brain Dysfunct 1994;7:155–164Google Scholar

33. Hagerman RJ: The Physical and Behavioral Phenotype, in Fragile X Syndrome: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Research. Edited by Hagerman RJ and Hagerman PJ. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002, pp 3–110Google Scholar

34. Cunningham LA: Depression in the medically ill: choosing an antidepressant. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55(Suppl A):90–97Google Scholar

35. Stoudemire A: Expanding psychopharmacologic treatment options for the depressed medical patient. Psychosomatics 1995; 36:S19–26Google Scholar

36. Flint AJ: Choosing appropriate antidepressant therapy in the elderly: a risk-benefit assessment of available agents. Drugs Aging 1998; 13:269–280Google Scholar

37. Steffens DC, Taylor W, Krishnan KRR: Progression of subcortical ischemic disease from vascular depression to vascular dementia. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:1751–1756Google Scholar