Abstract
The underlying purpose of this study was to consolidate a heuristic approach taking seriously and granting positive standing to the belief systems of Israeli Religious Zionism and US Christian dispensationalism. To some significant extent, this entailed reconceptualizing the classic analytical categories that social and political sciences deploy to address messianic and millenarian consensus. In particular, I challenged the idea that such a consensus is nothing but the outcome of deception and manipulation, an elaborate hoax, essentially manufactured by means of brainwashing or anaesthetization the genuine feelings of believers and/or capitalizing on their fears and anxieties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Marc Juergensmeyer, The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State, University of California Press, 1993, pp. 4–6.
See Hans Blumenberg, Work on Myth, trans. by Robert M. Wallace, MIT Press, 1985.
Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings (eds), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Vol. 3: 1935–38, Belknap, 2002, p. 305.
See Edward F. Edinger, Archetype of the Apocalypse: A Jungian Study of the Book of Revelation, Open Court, 1999, pp. 1–14.
Carl Gustav Jung, Essays on Contemporary Events, Routledge, 1958, p. 23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Carlo Aldrovandi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aldrovandi, C. (2014). Conclusion. In: Apocalyptic Movements in Contemporary Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316844_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316844_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32761-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31684-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)