This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Edelmann RJ, Connolly KJ. Gender differences in response to infertility and infertility investigations: real or illusory. Br J Health Psychol.2000;5:365–375.
Leiblum S, Aviv A, Hamer R. Life after infertility treatment: along-term investigation of marital and sexual function. Hum Reprod.1998;13(12):3569–3574.
Daniels K. Building a Family: with the Assistance of Donor Insemination. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press; 2004.
Archard D. Children, Family, and the State. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2003.
Lowie R. Social Organisation. New York: Rinehart; 1948.
Scheinder D. Kinship and biology. In: Coale A, Fallers L, Levy M, Scheinder D, Tomkins S, eds. Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
Scheinder D. What is kinship all about? In: Reining P, ed. Kinship studies in the Morgan centennial year. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington; 1972:32–63.
Scheinder D. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1984.
Finkler K. The kin in the gene: the medicalization of family and kinship in American society. Curr Anthropol. 2001;42(2):235–263.
Daniels K. Is blood really thicker than water? Assisted reproduction and its impact on our thinking about family. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26(4):265–270.
Finkler K, Skrzynia C, Evans JP. The new genetics and its consequences for family, kinship, medicine and medical genetics. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(3):403–412.
Brewaeys A, Golombok S, Naaktgeboren N, de Bruyn J, van Hall E. Donor insemination: Dutch parents’ opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1591–1597.
Miall CE. Community constructs of involuntary childlessness: sympathy, stigma, and social support. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol. 1994;31(4):392–421.
Blyth E. Secrets and lies: barriers to the exchange of genetic origins information following donor assisted conception. Adoption Fostering. 1999;23(1):49–58.
Daniels KR, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Polit Life Sci. 1993;12(2):155–170.
McWhinnie AM. Gamete donation and anonymity. Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):807–817.
Thorn P, Daniels K. A group-work approach in family building by donor insemination: empowering the marginalized. Hum Fertil. 2003;6:46–50.
Daniels KR, Blyth E, Hall D, Hanson KM. The best interests of the child in assisted human reproduction: the interplay between the state, professionals, and parents. Polit Life Sci. 2000;March:47–58.
Daniels K. New Zealand: from secrecy and shame to openness and acceptance. In: Blyth E, Landau R, eds. Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures. London: Jessica Kingley Publishers; 2004:148–167.
Edwards J. Donor insemination and ‘public opinion’. In: Daniels KR, Haimes E, eds. Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives, 1 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:151–172.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniels, K. (2007). The Family. In: Cockburn, J., Pawson, M.E. (eds) Psychological Challenges in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-808-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-808-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-807-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-808-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)