Abstract
In this chapter I will try to show that the idea of regressive intervention has not been accorded the attention by contemporary social science that it deserves. At the same time, I will suggest that research and theory in several domains have, wittingly or not, laid the foundations for a systematic treatment of the idea. In particular, I will be concerned with the place of reverse effects, first, in the writings of Merton and a few other social theorists who have addressed themselves to unanticipated consequences, and second, in the specific fields of planned organizational change, evaluation research, and social problems. By no means is it my intention to cover these fields in depth, but instead to search for certain global clues that indicate the way in which reverse effects have been customarily dealt with. I have relied heavily, therefore, on overviews of these fields and on the work of a few leading exemplars.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sieber, S.D. (1981). Regressive Intervention in Contemporary Theory and Research. In: Fatal Remedies. Environment, Development, and Public Policy Public Policy and Social Services. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7456-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7456-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7458-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7456-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive