Expert consensus for pertussis in children: new concepts in diagnosis and treatment

The expert groups collected clinical evidence, summarized their clinical experiences, evaluated preliminary recommendations or guidelines, and then organized open-ended discussions to form the recommendations. This consensus was developed by reviewing the literature and studies in databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, the China Biomedical Database, and the Chinese Journal Full-text Database up to May 2024. The search terms included “pertussis” or “whooping cough”, “children”, “diagnosis”, and “treatment”.

The burden of pertussis has also changed from infants to  school children and adults, and these age groups have consequently become the main source of infection for vulnerable population including infants and newborns. In China, a high prevalence of erythromycin-resistant Bordetella pertussis (ERBP) has been reported in the past decade. ERBP may lead to failed clinical empirical treatment with macrolides, which poses a great challenge for pertussis management and control. For better management of pertussis, a flow diagram for diagnosis and treatment of pertussis was presented in this consensus. This consensus also described the diagnostic criteria for pertussis, high-risk cases, and severe pertussis. Macrolides can still be used to treat confirmed erythromycin-sensitive B. pertussis (ESBP) infections, whereas oral trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole therapy is the initial treatment option for children older than two months. For infants younger than two months, severe patients, or those exhibiting a high degree of sulfonamide allergy, intravenous administration of piperacillin or cefoperazone–sulbactam is advised.

This expert consensus provides a comprehensive guidance and a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of pertussis in children.