Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

14-08-2024 | Ustekinumab | Original Research

Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab

Authors: Maryia Zhdanava, Sumesh Kachroo, Porpong Boonmak, Sabree Burbage, Aditi Shah, Jill Korsiak, Patrick Lefebvre, Caroline Kerner, Dominic Pilon

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 10/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.

Methods

Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015–06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients.

Results

At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29–4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63–2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07–3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76–6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82–3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01–1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00–3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09–7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254).

Conclusion

This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.
Appendix
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Literature
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Metadata
Title
Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab
Authors
Maryia Zhdanava
Sumesh Kachroo
Porpong Boonmak
Sabree Burbage
Aditi Shah
Jill Korsiak
Patrick Lefebvre
Caroline Kerner
Dominic Pilon
Publication date
14-08-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 10/2024
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6

Prof. Chantal Mathieu highlights how the absence of rigorous performance standards for continuous glucose monitors in Europe contributes to wide variability in device accuracy, raising important concerns about patient safety.

Supported by: Abbott Diabetes Care

Watch the full video

Prof. Chantal Mathieu highlights how the absence of rigorous performance standards for continuous glucose monitors in Europe contributes to wide variability in device accuracy, raising important concerns about patient safety.

Supported by: Abbott Diabetes Care

Log in / Register to watch the full video

Innovations in AML: insights and practical guidance

Hear directly from acute myeloid leukemia experts in this vodcast series focussing on innovations in molecular testing, emerging therapies, and targeted treatments, and get practical advice for improving the care of your patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Supported by:
  • Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more

ADA 2025: the 85th Scientific Sessions

Unlock your free and exclusive access to the latest news from the American Diabetes Association’s annual meeting.

Read more