Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 13-11-2024 | Urothelial Cancer | Review Article

The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab

Authors: Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin

Published in: Drugs | Issue 12/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Subbiah V, Wirth LJ, Kurzrock R, et al. Accelerated approvals hit the target in precision oncology. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):1976–9.PubMedCrossRef Subbiah V, Wirth LJ, Kurzrock R, et al. Accelerated approvals hit the target in precision oncology. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):1976–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wong W, Kowal S, To TM, et al. The value of the accelerated approval pathway: real-world outcomes associated with reducing the time between innovations. Future Oncol. 2024;20(16):1099–110.PubMedCrossRef Wong W, Kowal S, To TM, et al. The value of the accelerated approval pathway: real-world outcomes associated with reducing the time between innovations. Future Oncol. 2024;20(16):1099–110.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gyawali B, Kesselheim AS. Reinforcing the social compromise of accelerated approval. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(10):596–7.PubMedCrossRef Gyawali B, Kesselheim AS. Reinforcing the social compromise of accelerated approval. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(10):596–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wayant C, Mohyuddin GR, Prasad V. The accelerated approval pathway in oncology: balancing the benefits and potential harms. J Cancer Policy. 2022;32: 100323.PubMedCrossRef Wayant C, Mohyuddin GR, Prasad V. The accelerated approval pathway in oncology: balancing the benefits and potential harms. J Cancer Policy. 2022;32: 100323.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mehta GU, de Claro RA, Pazdur R. Accelerated approval is not conditional approval: insights from international expedited approval programs. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(3):335–6.PubMedCrossRef Mehta GU, de Claro RA, Pazdur R. Accelerated approval is not conditional approval: insights from international expedited approval programs. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(3):335–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bradford D, Demko S, Jin S, et al. FDA accelerated approval of pembrolizumab for recurrent locally advanced or metastatic merkel cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2020;25(7):e1077–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bradford D, Demko S, Jin S, et al. FDA accelerated approval of pembrolizumab for recurrent locally advanced or metastatic merkel cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2020;25(7):e1077–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Geoerger B, Kang HJ, Yalon-Oren M, et al. Pembrolizumab in paediatric patients with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1-positive, advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumour or lymphoma (KEYNOTE-051): interim analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):121–33.PubMedCrossRef Geoerger B, Kang HJ, Yalon-Oren M, et al. Pembrolizumab in paediatric patients with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1-positive, advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumour or lymphoma (KEYNOTE-051): interim analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):121–33.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, et al. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1497–508.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, et al. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):1497–508.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1817–28.PubMedCrossRef Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1817–28.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1109–17.PubMedCrossRef Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1109–17.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2018–28.PubMedCrossRef Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2018–28.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Frenel JS, Le Tourneau C, O’Neil B, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced, programmed death ligand 1-positive cervical cancer: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4035–41.PubMedCrossRef Frenel JS, Le Tourneau C, O’Neil B, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced, programmed death ligand 1-positive cervical cancer: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4035–41.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–8.PubMedCrossRef Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Chung HC, Piha-Paul SA, Lopez-Martin J, et al. Pembrolizumab after two or more lines of previous therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCLC: results from the KEYNOTE-028 and KEYNOTE-158 studies. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(4):618–27.PubMedCrossRef Chung HC, Piha-Paul SA, Lopez-Martin J, et al. Pembrolizumab after two or more lines of previous therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCLC: results from the KEYNOTE-028 and KEYNOTE-158 studies. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(4):618–27.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Marcus L, Fashoyin-Aje LA, Donoghue M, et al. FDA approval summary: pembrolizumab for the treatment of tumor mutational burden-high solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(17):4685–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Marcus L, Fashoyin-Aje LA, Donoghue M, et al. FDA approval summary: pembrolizumab for the treatment of tumor mutational burden-high solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(17):4685–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Yanez P, et al. The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Nature. 2021;600(7890):727–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Yanez P, et al. The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Nature. 2021;600(7890):727–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Fashoyin-Aje LA, Mehta GU, Beaver JA, Pazdur R. The on- and off-ramps of oncology accelerated approval. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(16):1439–42.PubMedCrossRef Fashoyin-Aje LA, Mehta GU, Beaver JA, Pazdur R. The on- and off-ramps of oncology accelerated approval. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(16):1439–42.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Clinical Trial Considerations to Support Accelerated Approval of Oncology Therapeutics Guidance for Industry 2023 [Cited 2 Jul 2024]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/166431/download. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Clinical Trial Considerations to Support Accelerated Approval of Oncology Therapeutics Guidance for Industry 2023 [Cited 2 Jul 2024]. Available from: https://​www.​fda.​gov/​media/​166431/​download.
46.
go back to reference Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2078–92.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2078–92.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540–50.PubMedCrossRef Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540–50.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):2981–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):2981–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
55.
go back to reference Chen R, Zinzani PL, Fanale MA, et al. Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for relapsed/refractory classic hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(19):2125–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen R, Zinzani PL, Fanale MA, et al. Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for relapsed/refractory classic hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(19):2125–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):908–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):908–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.PubMedCrossRef Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Kuruvilla J, Ramchandren R, Santoro A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus brentuximab vedotin in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (KEYNOTE-204): an interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):512–24.PubMedCrossRef Kuruvilla J, Ramchandren R, Santoro A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus brentuximab vedotin in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (KEYNOTE-204): an interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):512–24.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810–21.PubMedCrossRef Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810–21.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):556–67.PubMedCrossRef Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):556–67.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.PubMedCrossRef Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, et al. Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1856–67.PubMedCrossRef Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, et al. Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1856–67.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Blumenthal GM, Goldberg KB, Pazdur R. Drug development, trial design, and endpoints in oncology: adapting to rapidly changing science. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(5):572–4.PubMedCrossRef Blumenthal GM, Goldberg KB, Pazdur R. Drug development, trial design, and endpoints in oncology: adapting to rapidly changing science. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(5):572–4.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Balar AV, Castellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(11):1483–92.PubMedCrossRef Balar AV, Castellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(11):1483–92.PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Powles T, Csoszi T, Ozguroglu M, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(7):931–45.PubMedCrossRef Powles T, Csoszi T, Ozguroglu M, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(7):931–45.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Beaver JA, Pazdur R. “Dangling” accelerated approvals in oncology. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18): e68.PubMedCrossRef Beaver JA, Pazdur R. “Dangling” accelerated approvals in oncology. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18): e68.PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):940–52.PubMedCrossRef Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):940–52.PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(3):193–202.PubMedCrossRef Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(3):193–202.PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Qin S, Chen Z, Fang W, et al. Pembrolizumab plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care as second-line therapy in patients in Asia with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-394 study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4):383.CrossRef Qin S, Chen Z, Fang W, et al. Pembrolizumab plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care as second-line therapy in patients in Asia with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-394 study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4):383.CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Powles T, Valderrama BP, Gupta S, et al. Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(10):875–88.PubMedCrossRef Powles T, Valderrama BP, Gupta S, et al. Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(10):875–88.PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Shitara K, Ozguroglu M, Bang YJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10142):123–33.PubMedCrossRef Shitara K, Ozguroglu M, Bang YJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10142):123–33.PubMedCrossRef
94.
go back to reference Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1571–80.PubMedCrossRef Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1571–80.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Franco P, Jain R, Rosenkrands-Lange E, Hey C, Koban MU. Regulatory pathways supporting expedited drug development and approval in ICH member countries. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023;57(3):484–514.PubMedCrossRef Franco P, Jain R, Rosenkrands-Lange E, Hey C, Koban MU. Regulatory pathways supporting expedited drug development and approval in ICH member countries. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023;57(3):484–514.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Matsushita S, Tachibana K, Kusakabe T, Hirayama R, Tsutsumi Y, Kondoh M. Overview of the premarketing and postmarketing requirements for drugs granted japanese conditional marketing approval. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(3):806–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Matsushita S, Tachibana K, Kusakabe T, Hirayama R, Tsutsumi Y, Kondoh M. Overview of the premarketing and postmarketing requirements for drugs granted japanese conditional marketing approval. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(3):806–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
go back to reference de Claro RA, Spillman D, Hotaki LT, et al. Project orbis: global collaborative review program. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(24):6412–6.PubMedCrossRef de Claro RA, Spillman D, Hotaki LT, et al. Project orbis: global collaborative review program. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(24):6412–6.PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Beaver JA, Howie LJ, Pelosof L, et al. A 25-year experience of us food and drug administration accelerated approval of malignant hematology and oncology drugs and biologics: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(6):849–56.PubMedCrossRef Beaver JA, Howie LJ, Pelosof L, et al. A 25-year experience of us food and drug administration accelerated approval of malignant hematology and oncology drugs and biologics: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(6):849–56.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Benedict A, Szabo G, Marczell K, Doherty B, Martin S. Life Years Gained From the FDA Accelerated Approval Program in Oncology: A Portfolio Model. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024:1-8. Benedict A, Szabo G, Marczell K, Doherty B, Martin S. Life Years Gained From the FDA Accelerated Approval Program in Oncology: A Portfolio Model. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024:1-8.
105.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER),. Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Use as an Endpoint to Support Accelerated Approval Guidance for Industry 2020 [Accessed 9 Sept 2024]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/83507/download. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER),. Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Use as an Endpoint to Support Accelerated Approval Guidance for Industry 2020 [Accessed 9 Sept 2024]. Available from: https://​www.​fda.​gov/​media/​83507/​download.
108.
go back to reference Blumenthal GM, Bunn PA Jr, Chaft JE, et al. Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer. J Thor Oncol. 2018;13(12):1818–31.CrossRef Blumenthal GM, Bunn PA Jr, Chaft JE, et al. Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer. J Thor Oncol. 2018;13(12):1818–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab
Authors
Robert Kester
Sunita Zalani
Scot Ebbinghaus
Eric Rubin
Publication date
13-11-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs / Issue 12/2024
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7