Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 03-02-2025 | Urinary Incontinence | Original Article

Development and Validation of Risk Assessment Model for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Based on A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Algorithms

Authors: Ling Mei, Linbo Gao, Tao Wang, Dong Yang, Weixing Chen, Xiaoyu Niu

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

We aimed to develop and validate a clinically applicable risk assessment model for identifying women at a high risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) based on a retrospective practice.

Methods

This study enrolled patients with and without POP between January 2019 and December 2021. Clinical data were collected and machine learning models were applied, such as multilayer perceptron, logistic regression, random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine and extreme gradient boosting. Two datasets were constructed, one comprising all variables and the other excluding physical examination variables. Two versions of the machine learning model were developed. One was for professional doctors, and the other was for community-health providers. The area under the curve (AUC) and its confidence interval (CI), accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the model’s performance. The Shapley Additive Explanations method was used to visualize and interpret the model output.

Results

A total of 16,416 women were recruited, with 8,314 and 8,102 in the POP and non-POP groups respectively. Eighty-seven variables were recorded. Among all candidate models, the RF model with 13 variables showed the best performance, with an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI 0.793–0.817), accuracy of 0.723, F1 of 0.731, sensitivity of 0.742, and specificity of 0.703. Excluding the physical examination variables, the RF model with 11 variables showed an AUC, accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.716, 0.652, 0.688, 0.757, and 0.545 respectively.

Conclusions

We constructed a clinically applicable risk warning system that will help clinicians to identify women at a high risk of POP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pelvic organ prolapse: ACOG practice bulletin, number 214. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(5):e126–42. Pelvic organ prolapse: ACOG practice bulletin, number 214. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(5):e126–42.
2.
go back to reference Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Pizzoferrato AC, Thuillier C, Venara A, Bornsztein N, Bouquet S, Cayrac M, et al. Management of female pelvic organ prolapse-summary of the 2021 HAS guidelines. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023;52(3):102535.CrossRefPubMed Pizzoferrato AC, Thuillier C, Venara A, Bornsztein N, Bouquet S, Cayrac M, et al. Management of female pelvic organ prolapse-summary of the 2021 HAS guidelines. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023;52(3):102535.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidelines). BJU Int. 2019;123(5):777–803. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidelines). BJU Int. 2019;123(5):777–803.
6.
go back to reference Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll MK, Muñoz A. Genital hiatus size and the development of prolapse among parous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(2):e448–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll MK, Muñoz A. Genital hiatus size and the development of prolapse among parous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(2):e448–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Alexandra D, Alove T, Doyle S. Comparison of bony pelvic dimensions and demographic risk factors in individuals with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting Abstracts Supplement.24s. 2023. Alexandra D, Alove T, Doyle S. Comparison of bony pelvic dimensions and demographic risk factors in individuals with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting Abstracts Supplement.24s. 2023.
8.
go back to reference Chen ZA-O, Mikhail SM, Buttini M, Mowat A, Hartel G, Maher C. Online prediction tool for female pelvic floor dysfunction: development and validation. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(11):3025–33.CrossRefPubMed Chen ZA-O, Mikhail SM, Buttini M, Mowat A, Hartel G, Maher C. Online prediction tool for female pelvic floor dysfunction: development and validation. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(11):3025–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wang Q, Yu XJ, Liu HX, Wang HB, Sun XL, Wang J. Establishment and validation of prediction model of new-onset pelvic organ prolapse in early postpartum period. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022;57(1):32–8.PubMed Wang Q, Yu XJ, Liu HX, Wang HB, Sun XL, Wang J. Establishment and validation of prediction model of new-onset pelvic organ prolapse in early postpartum period. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022;57(1):32–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE Jr, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;368:m441.CrossRefPubMed Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE Jr, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;368:m441.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vergeldt TF, van Kuijk SM, Notten KJ, Kluivers KB, Weemhoff M. Anatomical cystocele recurrence: development and internal validation of a prediction model. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):341–7.CrossRefPubMed Vergeldt TF, van Kuijk SM, Notten KJ, Kluivers KB, Weemhoff M. Anatomical cystocele recurrence: development and internal validation of a prediction model. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):341–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Lukacz ES, Nolen TL, Shepherd JP, Barber MD, et al. Models for predicting recurrence, complications, and health status in women after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):298–309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Lukacz ES, Nolen TL, Shepherd JP, Barber MD, et al. Models for predicting recurrence, complications, and health status in women after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):298–309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Siff LN, Barber MD, Zyczynski HM, Rardin CR, Jakus-Waldman S, Rahn DD, et al. Immediate postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification measures and 2-year risk of prolapse recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):792–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siff LN, Barber MD, Zyczynski HM, Rardin CR, Jakus-Waldman S, Rahn DD, et al. Immediate postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification measures and 2-year risk of prolapse recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):792–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? a comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018;200(2):389–96.CrossRefPubMed Dallas KB, Rogo-Gupta L, Elliott CS. What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? a comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women. J Urol. 2018;200(2):389–96.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bradley MS, Sridhar A, Ferrante K, Andy UU, Visco AG, Florian-Rodriguez ME, et al. Association between enlarged genital hiatus and composite surgical failure after vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2023;29(5):479–88.CrossRef Bradley MS, Sridhar A, Ferrante K, Andy UU, Visco AG, Florian-Rodriguez ME, et al. Association between enlarged genital hiatus and composite surgical failure after vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2023;29(5):479–88.CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Kinay T, Tapisiz OL, Kiykac Altinbas S, Kayikcioglu F, Karakaya J, Moraloglu TO. The relationship between perineal body size, total vaginal length, apical prolapse, and prolapse symptoms. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2022;28(9):602–7.CrossRef Kinay T, Tapisiz OL, Kiykac Altinbas S, Kayikcioglu F, Karakaya J, Moraloglu TO. The relationship between perineal body size, total vaginal length, apical prolapse, and prolapse symptoms. Urogynecology (Hagerstown). 2022;28(9):602–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll MK, Muñoz A. Genital hiatus size and the development of prolapse among parous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(2):e448–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll MK, Muñoz A. Genital hiatus size and the development of prolapse among parous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27(2):e448–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Szatmari E, Makai A, Premusz V, Balla BF, Ambrus E, Boros-Balint I, et al. Hungarian women’s health care seeking behavior and knowledge of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a cross-sectional study. Urogynecology. 29(11):907–13.CrossRef Szatmari E, Makai A, Premusz V, Balla BF, Ambrus E, Boros-Balint I, et al. Hungarian women’s health care seeking behavior and knowledge of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a cross-sectional study. Urogynecology. 29(11):907–13.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Luo X, Ji F, Duan H, Zhang H, Niu X, Wang Z, et al. Specialist consensus on recognizing, repairing and cosmetic plastic of vaginal relaxation/laxity syndrome (Chinese). China Med Cosmetol. 2020;10(10):5–12. Luo X, Ji F, Duan H, Zhang H, Niu X, Wang Z, et al. Specialist consensus on recognizing, repairing and cosmetic plastic of vaginal relaxation/laxity syndrome (Chinese). China Med Cosmetol. 2020;10(10):5–12.
21.
go back to reference Chen K, Yu S, Sun L, Jiang J, Huang L and Zhou Q. Three-dimensional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography for evaluating function of puborectalis in postmenopausal women with stress incontinence (Chinese). Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2022;38(1):124–8. Chen K, Yu S, Sun L, Jiang J, Huang L and Zhou Q. Three-dimensional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography for evaluating function of puborectalis in postmenopausal women with stress incontinence (Chinese). Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2022;38(1):124–8.
22.
go back to reference Xu J, Chen T, Wu Z. Pelvic floor ultrasound, pelvic floor muscle electrophysiological parameters and analysis of influential factors of stress urinary incontinence in postpartum women (Chinese). Chin Foreign Med Res. 2022;20(30):172–6. Xu J, Chen T, Wu Z. Pelvic floor ultrasound, pelvic floor muscle electrophysiological parameters and analysis of influential factors of stress urinary incontinence in postpartum women (Chinese). Chin Foreign Med Res. 2022;20(30):172–6.
23.
go back to reference Giugale LE, Carter-Brooks CM, Ross JH, Shepherd JP, Zyczynski HM. Outcomes of a staged midurethral sling strategy for stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(4):736–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giugale LE, Carter-Brooks CM, Ross JH, Shepherd JP, Zyczynski HM. Outcomes of a staged midurethral sling strategy for stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(4):736–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Wong JWH, Ramm O. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;64(2):314–20.CrossRefPubMed Wong JWH, Ramm O. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;64(2):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nahshon C, Karmakar D, Abramov Y, Kugelman N, Lavie O, Zilberlicht A. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following colpocleisis: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(3):848–56.CrossRefPubMed Nahshon C, Karmakar D, Abramov Y, Kugelman N, Lavie O, Zilberlicht A. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following colpocleisis: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(3):848–56.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Oh S, Shin EK, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Lee Y, Jeon MJ. Anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse in urogynecology populations. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023;29(11):860–4.CrossRefPubMed Oh S, Shin EK, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Lee Y, Jeon MJ. Anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse in urogynecology populations. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023;29(11):860–4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pereira GMV, Cartwright R, Juliato CRT, Domoney C, Iglesia CB, Brito LGO. Treatment of women with vaginal laxity: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2024;21(5):430–42.CrossRefPubMed Pereira GMV, Cartwright R, Juliato CRT, Domoney C, Iglesia CB, Brito LGO. Treatment of women with vaginal laxity: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2024;21(5):430–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and Validation of Risk Assessment Model for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Based on A Retrospective Study with Machine Learning Algorithms
Authors
Ling Mei
Linbo Gao
Tao Wang
Dong Yang
Weixing Chen
Xiaoyu Niu
Publication date
03-02-2025
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06046-9

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.   

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now