Purpose
To retrospectively compare the clinical and pathological characteristics of breast masses and non-mass lesions that underwent ultrasound (US)-guided 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy (CNB) or 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB).
Methods
We retrospectively compared the results from US-guided diagnostic breast biopsy performed with a 16-gauge CNB (Magnum™) or a 12-gauge VAB (Celero®). The patients’ backgrounds and pathological features for each device were examined.
Results
In 453 patients with 500 lesions, 373 lesions underwent CNB and 127 underwent VAB. The positive biopsy rate (positive predictive value 3) was significantly higher for VAB (92/127; 72.4%) than for CNB (231/373; 61.9%) (P = 0.032). Non-mass lesions were biopsied more frequently with VAB (57/127; 47.4%) than with CNB (27/378; 7.14%) (P = 0.000). The upgrade rate from high-risk to malignant lesions was significantly higher for CNB (5/19; 26.3%) than for VAB (1/8; 12.5%) (P = 0.043). There were five (1.34%) specimen failures with CNB and one (0.78%) with VAB, 18 (4.82%) re-biopsies with CNB and three (2.36%) with VAB, and 11/21 (52.4%) upgrades from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with CNB and 11/30 (36.7%) with VAB. Although these rates tended to be higher with CNB than with VAB, the difference was not significant.
Conclusion
Although VAB had a significantly higher rate of non-mass lesion biopsies, the upgrade rate from high-risk to malignant lesions was significantly lower for VAB than for CNB. US-guided 12-gauge spring-loaded VAB may be more appropriate for biopsy of non-mass lesions.
