Skip to main content
Top

Ultrasound elastography of back muscle biomechanical properties: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current methods

  • Open Access
  • 01-12-2024
  • Critical Review
Published in:

Abstract

Objectives

To report the current elastography methods used to quantify back muscles’ biomechanical characteristics in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKd) and inform on their reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library and grey literature were consulted. Predefined criteria allowed for study selection and data extraction. The quality of evidence was rated using the COSMIN tool. Data were meta-analyzed in terms of pooled intraclass correlation coefficient (pICC) for reliability and pooled standardized mean difference (pSMD) for validity and responsiveness. Heterogeneity was assessed.

Results

Seventy-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis (total number of participants N = 3178). Three elastography methods were identified: strain imaging (SI; number of cohorts M = 26), shear wave imaging (SWI; M = 50), and vibration sonoelastography (VSE; M = 3). Strain imaging and SWI studies reported good reliability measurement properties (pICC > 0.70) and a medium pSMD (0.58 for SI and 0.60 for SWI; p ≤ 0.020) in discriminating MSKd from controls’ condition (validity). Strain imaging studies reported a medium pSMD (0.64; p = 0.005) in detecting within-group changes over time, whereas SWI pSMD was very high (1.24; p = 0.005). Only SWI reported significant but small pSMD (0.30; p = 0.003) in detecting between-group changes over time. The small number of VSE studies could not be meta-analyzed. Heterogeneity was high (I-squared > 90%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Elastography presents good reliability results and a medium pSMD in discriminating MSKd from control conditions. Responsiveness data suggest detectable changes within groups over time using SI and SWI, calling for long-term longitudinal studies. Assessing changes between groups over time using elastography still needs to be proven. Highly significant heterogeneity limits meta-analytic results.

Critical relevance statement

While still in its early-stage exploration phase, musculoskeletal ultrasound elastography may reliably quantify back muscles’ biomechanics in asymptomatic individuals, moderately discriminate back musculoskeletal disorders and detect biomechanical changes over time in these conditions, calling for long-term longitudinal studies.

Key Points

  • Ultrasound elastography is reviewed for back pain and related musculoskeletal disorder assessments.
  • Growing literature supports good reproducibility, some validity and responsiveness.
  • Back muscle elastography considers assumptions calling for standardized protocols.

Graphical Abstract

Title
Ultrasound elastography of back muscle biomechanical properties: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current methods
Authors
Mercedes David
Karine Devantéry
Bénédicte Nauche
Miguel Chagnon
Mark Keezer
Nathaly Gaudreault
Nathalie J. Bureau
Guy Cloutier
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01785-7
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more
Image Credits
Alzheimer’s disease in the biomarker era: preparing the multidisciplinary care team/© Springer Healthcare IME, Navigating neuroimaging in Alzheimer’s care: Practical applications and strategies for integration/© Springer Healthcare IME