Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

16-05-2024 | Original Research Article

Trends in Use and Evidence of Adherence to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Pregnancy Testing Requirements for Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, and Pomalidomide in the USA, 2000–2020

Authors: Mufaddal Mahesri, Ameet Sarpatwari, Krista F. Huybrechts, Joyce Lii, Su Been Lee, Gita A. Toyserkani, Cynthia LaCivita, Esther H. Zhou, Gerald J. Dal Pan, Aaron S. Kesselheim, Katsiaryna Bykov

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 9/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide are effective treatments for multiple myeloma but are teratogenic. To mitigate this risk, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs for these drugs, which include pregnancy testing among women of childbearing potential—twice before initiation, weekly in the first month on treatment, and every 2–4 weeks thereafter.

Objective

We evaluated dispensing trends of lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide and assessed adherence to REMS pregnancy testing requirements among at-risk patients taking these drugs.

Methods

Using three US health insurance claims databases (Optum Clinformatics® [2004–2020], Merative Marketscan [2003–2019], and Medicaid [2000–2018]), we assessed monthly use of the drugs, patient characteristics and treatment persistence among drug initiators, and claims-based evidence for adherence to pregnancy testing requirements among initiators with child-bearing potential.

Results

Lenalidomide was the most prescribed agent following its approval in 2006 and through the end of the study period. A total of 48,311 lenalidomide (mean age = 59 years [standard deviation (SD) = 16]), 17,550 thalidomide (mean age = 65 years [SD = 12]), and 6560 pomalidomide initiators (mean age = 65 years [SD = 11]) were identified; 45% of initiators of each drug were women. Among initiators under follow-up on day 90, 70% were still on therapy. Initiators of childbearing potential comprised 3% (N = 1,920) of all initiators; among this cohort, 12% had evidence in claims data of two pregnancy tests before initiation, and 9% with at least 33 days of follow-up of four tests during the first month of treatment. By contrast, 52% who received a refill had claims-based evidence of a pregnancy test within 7 days of dispensing.

Conclusion

Although most patients who initiated lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide were not of child-bearing potential, further investigation into actual non-adherence to pregnancy testing is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–48.CrossRefPubMed Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–48.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.CrossRefPubMed Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Therneau TM, Kyle RA, Melton LJ III, et al. Incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and estimation of duration before first clinical recognition. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:1071–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Therneau TM, Kyle RA, Melton LJ III, et al. Incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and estimation of duration before first clinical recognition. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:1071–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Uhl K, Cox E, Rogan R, et al. Thalidomide use in the US: experience with pregnancy testing in the S.T.E.P.S. programme. Drug Saf. 2006;29:321–9.CrossRefPubMed Uhl K, Cox E, Rogan R, et al. Thalidomide use in the US: experience with pregnancy testing in the S.T.E.P.S. programme. Drug Saf. 2006;29:321–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Castaneda CP, Zeldis JB, Freeman J, et al. RevAssist: a comprehensive risk minimization programme for preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide. Drug Saf. 2008;31:743–52.CrossRefPubMed Castaneda CP, Zeldis JB, Freeman J, et al. RevAssist: a comprehensive risk minimization programme for preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide. Drug Saf. 2008;31:743–52.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Avorn J, Kesselheim A, Sarpatwari A. The FDA Amendments Act of 2007—assessing its effects a decade later. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(12):1097–9.CrossRefPubMed Avorn J, Kesselheim A, Sarpatwari A. The FDA Amendments Act of 2007—assessing its effects a decade later. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(12):1097–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brandenburg NA, Bwire R, Freeman J, Houn F, Sheehan P, Zeldis JB. Effectiveness of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for lenalidomide and thalidomide: patient comprehension and knowledge retention. Drug Saf. 2017;40(4):333–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandenburg NA, Bwire R, Freeman J, Houn F, Sheehan P, Zeldis JB. Effectiveness of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for lenalidomide and thalidomide: patient comprehension and knowledge retention. Drug Saf. 2017;40(4):333–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bwire R, Freeman J, Houn F. Managing the teratogenic risk of thalidomide and lenalidomide: an industry perspective. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011;10(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed Bwire R, Freeman J, Houn F. Managing the teratogenic risk of thalidomide and lenalidomide: an industry perspective. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011;10(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sarpatwari A, Mitra-Majumdar M, Bykov K, et al. A multi-modal approach to evaluate the impact of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs. Drug Saf. 2021;44(7):743–51.CrossRefPubMed Sarpatwari A, Mitra-Majumdar M, Bykov K, et al. A multi-modal approach to evaluate the impact of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs. Drug Saf. 2021;44(7):743–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–37.CrossRefPubMed Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–37.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Levin R, Schneeweiss S. A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):749–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Levin R, Schneeweiss S. A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):749–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Sun JW, Rogers JR, Her Q, Welch EC, Panozzo CA, Toh S, Gagne JJ. Adaptation and validation of the combined comorbidity score for ICD-10-CM. Med Care. 2017;55(12):1046–51.CrossRefPubMed Sun JW, Rogers JR, Her Q, Welch EC, Panozzo CA, Toh S, Gagne JJ. Adaptation and validation of the combined comorbidity score for ICD-10-CM. Med Care. 2017;55(12):1046–51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chanan-Khan AA, Swaika A, Paulus A, et al. Pomalidomide: the new immunomodulatory agent for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3(9): e143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chanan-Khan AA, Swaika A, Paulus A, et al. Pomalidomide: the new immunomodulatory agent for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3(9): e143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Alonso R, Cedena MT, Wong S, Shah N, Ríos-Tamayo R, Moraleda JM, et al. Prolonged lenalidomide maintenance therapy improves the depth of response in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020;4(10):2163–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alonso R, Cedena MT, Wong S, Shah N, Ríos-Tamayo R, Moraleda JM, et al. Prolonged lenalidomide maintenance therapy improves the depth of response in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020;4(10):2163–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Luo J, Gagne JJ, Landon J, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. Comparative effectiveness and safety of thalidomide and lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;70:22–33.CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Gagne JJ, Landon J, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. Comparative effectiveness and safety of thalidomide and lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2017;70:22–33.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Huber JH, Mengmeng J, Shih YH, Wang M, Colditz G, Chang SH. Disentangling age, gender, and racial/ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma burden: a modeling study. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huber JH, Mengmeng J, Shih YH, Wang M, Colditz G, Chang SH. Disentangling age, gender, and racial/ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma burden: a modeling study. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Sarpatwari A, Brown BL, McGraw SA, Dejene SZ, Abdurrob A, Santiago Ortiz AJ, Kesselheim AS. Patient and caregiver experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1): e2144386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sarpatwari A, Brown BL, McGraw SA, Dejene SZ, Abdurrob A, Santiago Ortiz AJ, Kesselheim AS. Patient and caregiver experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1): e2144386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Trends in Use and Evidence of Adherence to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Pregnancy Testing Requirements for Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, and Pomalidomide in the USA, 2000–2020
Authors
Mufaddal Mahesri
Ameet Sarpatwari
Krista F. Huybrechts
Joyce Lii
Su Been Lee
Gita A. Toyserkani
Cynthia LaCivita
Esther H. Zhou
Gerald J. Dal Pan
Aaron S. Kesselheim
Katsiaryna Bykov
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 9/2024
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01443-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2024

Drug Safety 9/2024 Go to the issue