Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ESC Congress

Discover the latest news and 2024 updates on managing hypertension, heart failure, coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation and arterial disease. 
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Published in:

18-12-2023 | Original Research Article

Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Authors: Ruth C. Waumans, Anna D. T. Muntingh, Jorien Veldwijk, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, Anton J. L. M. van Balkom, Neeltje M. Batelaan

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Depression in adolescents and young adults is common and causes considerable disease burden while hampering their development, leading to adverse consequences in later life. Although treatment is available, young people are a vulnerable group regarding uptake and completion of treatment. To improve this, insight into youth’s preferences for treatment is essential.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences for depression treatment in a Dutch sample aged 16–24 years using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods

The study was conducted in The Netherlands between October 2018 and June 2019, and included 236 adolescents and young adults with current depressive symptoms or previous treatment. The DCE included five attributes (treatment type, frequency of appointment, waiting time, effectiveness, evaluation of therapeutic alliance) with corresponding levels. Results were analysed using latent class analysis.

Results

Results show a general preference for individual psychotherapy, treatment with high frequency, high effectiveness, short waiting time and a standard evaluation of the therapeutic alliance (‘click’ with the therapist) early in treatment. Latent class analysis revealed three different patterns of preferences regarding treatment type and willingness to engage in therapy. The first class showed a strong preference for individual therapy. The second class, including relatively older, higher educated and treatment-experienced participants, preferred high frequency treatment and was more open to different forms of therapy. The third class, including lower educated, younger and treatment-naïve adolescents showed reluctance to engage in therapy overall and in group therapy specifically.

Conclusion

In this DCE, three classes could be identified that share similar preferences regarding treatment effectiveness, waiting time and evaluation of the therapeutic alliance, but varied considerably in their preference for treatment type (individual, group, or combined psychotherapy) and their willingness to engage. The results from this study may inform mental health care providers and institutions and help optimize professional care for adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, improving engagement in this vulnerable group.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ormel J, Raven D, Van Oort F, Hartman CA, Reijneveld SA, Veenstra R, et al. Mental health in Dutch adolescents: a TRAILS report on prevalence, severity, age of onset, continuity and co-morbidity of DSM disorders. Psychol Med. 2015;45(2):345–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Wittchen HU. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):169–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
Public Health Group. Victorian Burden of Disease Study: mortality and morbidity in 2001. Melbourne: Public Health Group; 2005. p. 1–228.
4.
5.
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96.CrossRef
6.
Hysenbegasi A, Hass SL, Rowland CR. The impact of depression on the academic productivity of university students. J Mental Health Policy Econ. 2005;8(3):145–51.
7.
Verboom CE, Sijtsema JJ, Verhulst FC, Penninx BWJH, Ormel J. Longitudinal associations between depressive problems, academic performance, and social functioning in adolescent boys and girls. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(1):247–57.PubMedCrossRef
8.
D’Hulst A, Kiekens G, Auerbach RP, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, Ebert DD, et al. Major depressive episode in college freshmen: prevalence, academic functioning and receipt of treatment. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2021;63(1):24–31.PubMed
9.
Kim-Cohen J, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Prior Juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(7):709.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Bardone A, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Dickson N, Stanton W, Silva P. Adult physical health outcomes of adolescent girls with conduct disorder, depression, and anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37(6):594–601.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
13.
Eisenberg D, Chung H. Adequacy of depression treatment among college students in the United States. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(3):213–20.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Kasteenpohja T, Marttunen M, Aalto-Setälä T, Perälä J, Saarni SI, Suvisaari J. Treatment received and treatment adequacy of depressive disorders among young adults in Finland. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1).
15.
Edlund MJ, Wang PS, Berglund PA, Katz SJ, Lin E, Kessler RC. Dropping out of mental health treatment: Patterns and predictors among epidemiological survey respondents in the United States and Ontario. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(5):845–51.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Wang JL. Mental health treatment dropout and its correlates in a general population sample. Med Care. 2007;45(3):224–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Eigenhuis E, Waumans RC, Muntingh ADT, Westerman MJ, van Meijel M, Batelaan NM, et al. Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3 March 2021):1–20.
18.
Aguirre Velasco A, Cruz ISS, Billings J, Jimenez M, Rowe S. What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):293.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
19.
Dwight-Johnson M, Unutzer J, Sherbourne C, Tang L, Wells KB. Can quality improvement programs for depression in primary care address patient preferences for treatment? Med Care. 2001;39(9):934–44.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Lindhiem O, Bennett C, Trentacosta C, McLear C. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(6):506–17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
21.
Swift JK, Callahan JL, Cooper M, Parkin SR. The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2018;74(11):1924–37.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Windle E, Tee H, Sabitova A, Jovanovic N, Priebe S, Carr C. Association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions a systematic review and meta-analysis supplemental content. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(3):294–302. https://​jamanetwork.​com/​
23.
Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. Applied choice analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.CrossRef
24.
Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J. 2000;320(7248):1530–3.CrossRef
25.
26.
Okumura Y, Sakamoto S. Depression treatment preferences among Japanese undergraduates: using conjoint analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012;58(2):195–203.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lokkerbol J, Geomini A, van Voorthuijsen J, van Straten A, Tiemens B, Smit F, et al. A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with depression. J Med Econ. 2019;22(2):178–86.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Ride J, Lancsar E. Women’s preferences for treatment of perinatal depression and anxiety: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):1–23.CrossRef
29.
Muntingh ADT, Hoogendoorn AW, Van Schaik DJF, Van Straten A, Stolk EA, Van Balkom AJLM, et al. Patient preferences for a guided self-help programme to prevent relapse in anxiety or depression: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):1–26.CrossRef
30.
31.
Bliemer M, Rose J. Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. Transportation Research Broad Annual Meeting, 11 January–15 January 2009; Washington DC
32.
Veldwijk J, Lambooij MS, De Bekker-Grob EW, Smit HA, De Wit GA. The effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments. PLoS One. 2014;9(11).
33.
Bernstein IH, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Hughes CW, Macleod L, Witte BP, Jain S, Mayes TL EGJ. Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(4).
34.
Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown GSR. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(6):893–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
VanderZee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink JW de HH. Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med. 1996;3(2):104–22.
36.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burström K, Cavrini G, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):887–97.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
37.
Hendriks V, Spijkerman R, van Oort M, van de Glind G, Müller M, van der Schee E, et al. Richtlijn ADHD en middelengebruik bij adolescenten. Screening, diagnostiek en behandeling in de jeugd-GGZ en jeugdverslavingszorg. Richtlijn ADHD en middelengebruik bij adolescenten Screening, diagnostiek en behandeling in de jeugd-GGZ en jeugdverslavingszorg. 2014.
38.
Hakkaart-van Roijen L, van Straten A, Tiemens B, Donker M. Manual Trimbos/iMTA Questionnaire for Costs Associated with Psychiatric Illness (TIC-P) (in Dutch). Institute for Medical Technology Assessment; 2002.
39.
40.
Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med Decis Making. 2007;27(5):672–80.PubMedCrossRef
41.
42.
Pacifico D, Yoo H. lclogit: a Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm. Stata J. 2013;13(3):625–39.CrossRef
43.
Lokkerbol J, van Voorthuijsen JM, Geomini A, Tiemens B, van Straten A, Smit F, et al. A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder. J Med Econ. 2019;22(2):169–77.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Hay J, Zhang L, Tang L, Green JM, et al. Effectiveness of collaborative care in addressing depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(11):1112–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Shechtman Z, Kiezel A. Why do people prefer individual therapy over group therapy? Int J Group Psychother. 2016;66(4):571–91.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Newbold A, Hardy G, Byng R. Staff and patient experience of improving access to psychological therapy group interventions for anxiety and depression. J Ment Health. 2013;22(5):456–64.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Broomfield G, Brown SD, Yap MBH. Socioeconomic factors and parents’ preferences for internet- and mobile-based parenting interventions to prevent youth mental health problems: a discrete choice experiment. Internet Interv. 2022;28: 100522.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
48.
Tünneßen M, Hiligsmann M, Stock S, Vennedey V. Patients’ preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments. J Med Econ. 2020;23(6):546–56.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Van der Maat M, De Jong J. Eigen risico in de zorgverzekering: het verzekerden-perspectief [in Dutch]. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research; 2010
50.
Cunningham CE, Zipursky RB, Christensen BK, Bieling PJ, Madsen V, Rimas H, et al. Modeling the mental health service utilization decisions of university undergraduates: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. J Am Coll Health. 2017;65(6):389–99.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Morey E, Thacher JA, Craighead WE. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007;10(2):73–85.PubMed
52.
Prins MA, Verhaak PFM, Bensing JM, Van Der MK. Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression—the patients ’ perspective explored. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:1038–58.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Baier AL, Kline AC, Feeny NC. Therapeutic alliance as a mediator of change: a systematic review and evaluation of research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;2020(82): 101921.
54.
Sharf J, Primavera LH, Diener MJ. Dropout and therapeutic alliance: a meta-analysis of adult individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010;47(4):637–45.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Siponen U, Välimäki M. Patients’ satisfaction with outpatient psychiatric care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003;10(2):129–35.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Bleustein C, Rothschild DB, Valen A, Valaitis E, Schweitzer L, Jones R. Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(5):393–400.PubMed
57.
de Bekker-Grob EW, Swait JD, Kassahun HT, Bliemer MCJ, Jonker MF, Veldwijk J, et al. Are healthcare choices predictable? The impact of discrete choice experiment designs and models. Value Health. 2019;22(9):1050–62.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Ozdemir S, Johnson FRHAB. Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(4):894–901.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Authors
Ruth C. Waumans
Anna D. T. Muntingh
Jorien Veldwijk
Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
Neeltje M. Batelaan
Publication date
18-12-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2024 Go to the issue

Practical Application

Simplified Methods for Modelling Dependent Parameters in Health Economic Evaluations: A Tutorial

Original Research Article

Estimating Transition Probabilities for Modeling Major Depression in Adolescents by Sex and Race or Ethnicity Combinations in the USA

Original Research Article

The Impact of Raising Alcohol Taxes on Government Tax Revenue: Insights from Five European Countries

Original Research Article

Health Interventions May Have Divergent Impacts on Health and Economic Equity: A Case Study of the Community-Based Hypertension Improvement Project in Ghana

Review Article

What Interventions are Cost Effective in Reducing Violence Against Women? A Scoping Review

Original Research Article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Intensification of Treatment in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in India