Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-04-2023 | Original Paper

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Pediatric Populations—– Voices from Typically Developing Children and Adolescents and their Parents

Authors: Anna Sierawska, Maike Splittgerber, Vera Moliadze, Michael Siniatchkin, Alena Buyx

Published in: Neuroethics | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a brain stimulation technique currently being researched as an alternative or complimentary treatment for various neurological disorders. There is little knowledge about experiences of the participants of tDCS clinical research, especially from pediatric studies.

Methods

An interview study with typically developing minors (n = 19, mean age 13,66 years) participating in a tDCS study, and their parents (n = 18) was conducted to explore their views and experiences and inform the ethical analysis.

Results

Children (10–13 years old) and adolescents (14–18 years old) reported good experiences with the stimulation. Next to financial incentives, main motives to participate in the study were curiosity and the possibility to help develop treatments for children affected by neurological disorders. They could also see a potential of using tDCS in a non-medical setting, especially regarding the provision of equal opportunity, e.g. in education. Parents also presented a positive attitude towards tDCS and their children participation in the basic research study. Nevertheless, their understanding of tDCS was rather poor. Even though many of them understood the techniques, they often did not see the link between the (current) lack of side effects and an absence of longitudinal studies. Parents were also cautious about using tDCS for non-medical/enhancement purposes.

Conclusions

The study findings show a need for more transparent information about the state of the art of tDCS, its function and what it might be able to offer, especially considering the good acceptability of tDCS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
According to clinicaltrials.gov 111 tDCS were registered between 2001–2011 in comparison to 1006 studies in the last ten years (2012–2022), stand April 2022.
 
2
The topic guide for children/adolescents did not include any questions about DIY or tDCS devices available online.
 
3
The OptiStim study also takes place also at the University of Coimbra in Portugal. Portugal does not allow financial reimbursement for study participants and thus they do not receive any payment for their participation in the study. Participants and their families are reimbursed with costs for traveling, meals, and accommodation through payment of daily allowances.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holdefer, R.N., R. Sadleir, and M.J. Russell. 2006. Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (6): 1388–1397.CrossRef Holdefer, R.N., R. Sadleir, and M.J. Russell. 2006. Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (6): 1388–1397.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lefaucheur, J.P., A. Antal, S.S. Ayache, D.H. Benninger, J. Brunelin, F. Cogiamanian, et al. 2017. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (1): 56–92.CrossRef Lefaucheur, J.P., A. Antal, S.S. Ayache, D.H. Benninger, J. Brunelin, F. Cogiamanian, et al. 2017. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (1): 56–92.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Radman, T., A. Datta, R.L. Ramos, J.C. Brumberg, and M. Bikson. 2009. One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009: 6481–6484.CrossRef Radman, T., A. Datta, R.L. Ramos, J.C. Brumberg, and M. Bikson. 2009. One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009: 6481–6484.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Polania, R., M.A. Nitsche, and C.C. Ruff. 2018. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nature Neuroscience 21 (2): 174–187.CrossRef Polania, R., M.A. Nitsche, and C.C. Ruff. 2018. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nature Neuroscience 21 (2): 174–187.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ridding, M.C., and U. Ziemann. 2010. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. The Journal of Physiology. 588 (Pt 13): 2291–2304.CrossRef Ridding, M.C., and U. Ziemann. 2010. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. The Journal of Physiology. 588 (Pt 13): 2291–2304.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fitzgerald, P.B., and R.A. Segrave. 2015. Deep brain stimulation in mental health: Review of evidence for clinical efficacy. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 49 (11): 979–993.CrossRef Fitzgerald, P.B., and R.A. Segrave. 2015. Deep brain stimulation in mental health: Review of evidence for clinical efficacy. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 49 (11): 979–993.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Agarwal, S.M., V. Shivakumar, A. Bose, A. Subramaniam, H. Nawani, H. Chhabra, et al. 2013. Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neuroscience 11 (3): 118–125.CrossRef Agarwal, S.M., V. Shivakumar, A. Bose, A. Subramaniam, H. Nawani, H. Chhabra, et al. 2013. Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neuroscience 11 (3): 118–125.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salehinejad, MA, Nejati, V, Mosayebi-Samani, M, Mohammadi, A, Wischnewski, M, Kuo, MF, Avenanti, A, Vicario, CM, Nitsche, MA. 2020 . Transcranial direct current stimulation in adhd: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and protocol-induced electrical field modeling results. Neuroscience Bulletin 36 (10):1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00501-x Salehinejad, MA, Nejati, V, Mosayebi-Samani, M, Mohammadi, A, Wischnewski, M, Kuo, MF, Avenanti, A, Vicario, CM, Nitsche, MA. 2020 . Transcranial direct current stimulation in adhd: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and protocol-induced electrical field modeling results. Neuroscience Bulletin 36 (10):1191–1212. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12264-020-00501-x
9.
go back to reference Jog, M.V., D.J.J. Wang, and K.L. Narr. 2019. A review of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the individualized treatment of depressive symptoms. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry 17–18: 17–22.CrossRef Jog, M.V., D.J.J. Wang, and K.L. Narr. 2019. A review of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the individualized treatment of depressive symptoms. Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry 17–18: 17–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Palm, U., A. Hasan, W. Strube, and F. Padberg. 2016. tDCS for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 266 (8): 681–694.CrossRef Palm, U., A. Hasan, W. Strube, and F. Padberg. 2016. tDCS for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 266 (8): 681–694.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fregni, F., M.M. El-Hagrassy, K. Pacheco-Barrios, S. Carvalho, J. Leite, M. Simis, et al. 2020. Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 24 (4): 256–313.CrossRef Fregni, F., M.M. El-Hagrassy, K. Pacheco-Barrios, S. Carvalho, J. Leite, M. Simis, et al. 2020. Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 24 (4): 256–313.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chase, H.W., M.A. Boudewyn, C.S. Carter, and M.L. Phillips. 2020. Transcranial direct current stimulation: A roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Molecular Psychiatry 25 (2): 397–407.CrossRef Chase, H.W., M.A. Boudewyn, C.S. Carter, and M.L. Phillips. 2020. Transcranial direct current stimulation: A roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Molecular Psychiatry 25 (2): 397–407.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Antal, A., I. Alekseichuk, M. Bikson, J. Brockmoller, A.R. Brunoni, R. Chen, et al. 2017. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (9): 1774–1809.CrossRef Antal, A., I. Alekseichuk, M. Bikson, J. Brockmoller, A.R. Brunoni, R. Chen, et al. 2017. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology 128 (9): 1774–1809.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Buchanan, DM, Bogdanowicz, T, Khanna N, Lockman-Dufour, G, Robaey, P, D'Angiulli, A. 2021. Systematic review on the safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Sciences 11 (2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020212 Buchanan, DM, Bogdanowicz, T, Khanna N, Lockman-Dufour, G, Robaey, P, D'Angiulli, A. 2021. Systematic review on the safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Sciences 11 (2):212. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​brainsci11020212​
15.
go back to reference Rakhade, S.N., and F.E. Jensen. 2009. Epileptogenesis in the immature brain: Emerging mechanisms. Nature Reviews. Neurology 5 (7): 380–391.CrossRef Rakhade, S.N., and F.E. Jensen. 2009. Epileptogenesis in the immature brain: Emerging mechanisms. Nature Reviews. Neurology 5 (7): 380–391.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rivera-Urbina, G.N., M.A. Nitsche, C.M. Vicario, and A. Molero-Chamizo. 2017. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 28 (2): 173–184.CrossRef Rivera-Urbina, G.N., M.A. Nitsche, C.M. Vicario, and A. Molero-Chamizo. 2017. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 28 (2): 173–184.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davis, N.J. 2021. Variance in cortical depth across the brain surface: Implications for transcranial stimulation of the brain. European Journal of Neuroscience 53 (4): 996–1007.CrossRef Davis, N.J. 2021. Variance in cortical depth across the brain surface: Implications for transcranial stimulation of the brain. European Journal of Neuroscience 53 (4): 996–1007.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hunold, A., J. Haueisen, C.M. Freitag, M. Siniatchkin, and V. Moliadze. 2021. Cortical current density magnitudes during transcranial direct current stimulation correlate with skull thickness in children, adolescent and young adults. Progress in Brain Research 264: 41–56.CrossRef Hunold, A., J. Haueisen, C.M. Freitag, M. Siniatchkin, and V. Moliadze. 2021. Cortical current density magnitudes during transcranial direct current stimulation correlate with skull thickness in children, adolescent and young adults. Progress in Brain Research 264: 41–56.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Graham, J., and D. Coghill. 2008. Adverse Effects of Pharmacotherapies for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs 22 (3): 213–237.CrossRef Graham, J., and D. Coghill. 2008. Adverse Effects of Pharmacotherapies for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs 22 (3): 213–237.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Davis NJ. 2014. Transcranial stimulation of the developing brain: A plea for extreme caution. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(AUG). Davis NJ. 2014. Transcranial stimulation of the developing brain: A plea for extreme caution. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(AUG).
21.
go back to reference Sierawska A, Prehn-Kristensen A, Moliadze V, Krauel K, Nowak R, Freitag CM, et al. 2019. Unmet Needs in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Fill the Gap? Promises and Ethical Challenges. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10:334. Sierawska A, Prehn-Kristensen A, Moliadze V, Krauel K, Nowak R, Freitag CM, et al. 2019. Unmet Needs in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Fill the Gap? Promises and Ethical Challenges. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10:334.
22.
go back to reference Breitling, C., T. Zaehle, M. Dannhauer, J. Tegelbeckers, H.-H. Flechtner, and K. Krauel. 2020. Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology. 131 (5): 1146–1154.CrossRef Breitling, C., T. Zaehle, M. Dannhauer, J. Tegelbeckers, H.-H. Flechtner, and K. Krauel. 2020. Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology. 131 (5): 1146–1154.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nwaroh, C., A. Giuffre, L. Cole, T. Bell, H.L. Carlson, F.P. MacMaster, et al. 2020. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on GABA and Glx in Children: A pilot study. PLOS ONE 15 (1): e0222620.CrossRef Nwaroh, C., A. Giuffre, L. Cole, T. Bell, H.L. Carlson, F.P. MacMaster, et al. 2020. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on GABA and Glx in Children: A pilot study. PLOS ONE 15 (1): e0222620.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Moliadze, V., T. Schmanke, S. Andreas, E. Lyzhko, C.M. Freitag, and M. Siniatchkin. 2015. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Clinical neurophysiology : Official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 126 (7): 1392–1399.CrossRef Moliadze, V., T. Schmanke, S. Andreas, E. Lyzhko, C.M. Freitag, and M. Siniatchkin. 2015. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Clinical neurophysiology : Official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 126 (7): 1392–1399.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ciechanski, P., and A. Kirton. 2017. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cerebral Cortex 27 (5): 2758–2767. Ciechanski, P., and A. Kirton. 2017. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cerebral Cortex 27 (5): 2758–2767.
26.
go back to reference Singh, I., and K.J. Kelleher. 2010. Neuroenhancement in Young People: Proposal for Research, Policy, and Clinical Management. AJOB Neuroscience. 1 (1): 3–16.CrossRef Singh, I., and K.J. Kelleher. 2010. Neuroenhancement in Young People: Proposal for Research, Policy, and Clinical Management. AJOB Neuroscience. 1 (1): 3–16.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dubljević, V., V. Saigle, and E. Racine. 2014. The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature. Neuron 82 (4): 731–736.CrossRef Dubljević, V., V. Saigle, and E. Racine. 2014. The Rising Tide of tDCS in the Media and Academic Literature. Neuron 82 (4): 731–736.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lucena, M.F.G., P.E.P. Teixeira, C. Bonin Pinto, and F. Fregni. 2019. Top 100 cited noninvasive neuromodulation clinical trials. Expert Review of Medical Devices 16 (6): 451–466.CrossRef Lucena, M.F.G., P.E.P. Teixeira, C. Bonin Pinto, and F. Fregni. 2019. Top 100 cited noninvasive neuromodulation clinical trials. Expert Review of Medical Devices 16 (6): 451–466.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2015. Children and clinical research: ethical issues. London. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2015. Children and clinical research: ethical issues. London. 
30.
go back to reference Brett, J., S. Staniszewska, C. Mockford, S. Herron-Marx, J. Hughes, C. Tysall, et al. 2014. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 7 (4): 387–395.CrossRef Brett, J., S. Staniszewska, C. Mockford, S. Herron-Marx, J. Hughes, C. Tysall, et al. 2014. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 7 (4): 387–395.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Woolf, S.H. 2008. The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters. JAMA 299 (2): 211–213.CrossRef Woolf, S.H. 2008. The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters. JAMA 299 (2): 211–213.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wexler, A. 2016. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: Implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals. Journal of Medical Ethics. 42 (4): 211–215.CrossRef Wexler, A. 2016. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: Implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals. Journal of Medical Ethics. 42 (4): 211–215.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fregni, F., M.A. Nitsche, C.K. Loo, A.R. Brunoni, P. Marangolo, J. Leite, et al. 2015. Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Clinical research and regulatory affairs. 32 (1): 22–35.CrossRef Fregni, F., M.A. Nitsche, C.K. Loo, A.R. Brunoni, P. Marangolo, J. Leite, et al. 2015. Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Clinical research and regulatory affairs. 32 (1): 22–35.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Maslen H, Douglas T, Cohen Kadosh R, Levy N, Savulescu J. 2015. The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: refining Maslen et al.'s model. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2(3):754–67. Maslen H, Douglas T, Cohen Kadosh R, Levy N, Savulescu J. 2015. The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: refining Maslen et al.'s model. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2(3):754–67.
36.
go back to reference Zandvakili, A., Y.A. Berlow, L.L. Carpenter, and N.S. Philip. 2019. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatry: What Psychiatrists Need to Know. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 17 (1): 44–49. Zandvakili, A., Y.A. Berlow, L.L. Carpenter, and N.S. Philip. 2019. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatry: What Psychiatrists Need to Know. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 17 (1): 44–49.
39.
go back to reference Ritchie, L, Ormston, Nicholls. 2014. Qualitative research practice: Sage. Ritchie, L, Ormston, Nicholls. 2014. Qualitative research practice: Sage. 
41.
go back to reference Maslen, H., B.D. Earp, R. Cohen Kadosh, and J. Savulescu. 2014. Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: An ethical analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 953.CrossRef Maslen, H., B.D. Earp, R. Cohen Kadosh, and J. Savulescu. 2014. Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: An ethical analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 953.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Rivera-Urbinaa, G.N., M.A. Nitsche, C.M. Vicario, and A. Molero-Chamizo. 2017. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 28 (2): 173–184.CrossRef Rivera-Urbinaa, G.N., M.A. Nitsche, C.M. Vicario, and A. Molero-Chamizo. 2017. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 28 (2): 173–184.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference MacMaster FP, Sembo M, Ma K, Croarkin P. 2016. Brain stimulation in childhood mental health: Therapeutic applications. Pediatric brain stimulation: Mapping and modulating the developing brain. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; US; p. 321–44. MacMaster FP, Sembo M, Ma K, Croarkin P. 2016. Brain stimulation in childhood mental health: Therapeutic applications. Pediatric brain stimulation: Mapping and modulating the developing brain. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; US; p. 321–44.
44.
go back to reference Muszkat, D., G.V. Polanczyk, T.G.C. Dias, and A.R. Brunoni. 2016. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 26 (7): 590–597.CrossRef Muszkat, D., G.V. Polanczyk, T.G.C. Dias, and A.R. Brunoni. 2016. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 26 (7): 590–597.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Wurzman, R.P., and R.H. Hamilton. 2016. Ethical Aspects of tDCS Use in Neuropsychiatry and the Risk of Misuse. In Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Clinical Principles and Management, ed. A. Brunoni, M. Nitsche, and C. Loo, 363–382. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef Wurzman, R.P., and R.H. Hamilton. 2016. Ethical Aspects of tDCS Use in Neuropsychiatry and the Risk of Misuse. In Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Clinical Principles and Management, ed. A. Brunoni, M. Nitsche, and C. Loo, 363–382. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Palm, U., F.M. Segmiller, A.N. Epple, F.J. Freisleder, N. Koutsouleris, G. Schulte-Korne, et al. 2016. Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: A comprehensive review. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna) 123 (10): 1219–1234.CrossRef Palm, U., F.M. Segmiller, A.N. Epple, F.J. Freisleder, N. Koutsouleris, G. Schulte-Korne, et al. 2016. Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: A comprehensive review. Journal of Neural Transmission (Vienna) 123 (10): 1219–1234.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Cohen Kadosh, R., N. Levy, J. O’Shea, N. Shea, and J. Savulescu. 2012. The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation. Current Biology : CB. 22 (4): R108–R111.CrossRef Cohen Kadosh, R., N. Levy, J. O’Shea, N. Shea, and J. Savulescu. 2012. The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation. Current Biology : CB. 22 (4): R108–R111.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Poleszczyk A, Antosik-Wojcinska AZ. 2015. Transcranial direct current stimulation-possible therapeutic applications in psychiatric disorders in adults and children. [Polish]. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review. 17(4):341–6. Poleszczyk A, Antosik-Wojcinska AZ. 2015. Transcranial direct current stimulation-possible therapeutic applications in psychiatric disorders in adults and children. [Polish]. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review. 17(4):341–6.
49.
go back to reference Rubio-Morell, B., A. Rotenberg, S. Hernandez-Exposito, and A. Pascual-Leone. 2011. The use of noninvasive brain stimulation in childhood psychiatric disorders: New diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Revista de Neurologia. 53 (4): 209–225. Rubio-Morell, B., A. Rotenberg, S. Hernandez-Exposito, and A. Pascual-Leone. 2011. The use of noninvasive brain stimulation in childhood psychiatric disorders: New diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Revista de Neurologia. 53 (4): 209–225.
50.
go back to reference Kail RV. 2011. Children and Their Development. 6th ed. N.J: Prentice Hall.: Englewood Cliffs. Kail RV. 2011. Children and Their Development. 6th ed. N.J: Prentice Hall.: Englewood Cliffs.
51.
go back to reference Gandiga, P.C., F.C. Hummel, and L.G. Cohen. 2006. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (4): 845–850.CrossRef Gandiga, P.C., F.C. Hummel, and L.G. Cohen. 2006. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (4): 845–850.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Low, J. 2019. A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation. Sociological Focus. 52 (2): 131–139.CrossRef Low, J. 2019. A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation. Sociological Focus. 52 (2): 131–139.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Antal, A., D. Terney, C. Poreisz, and W. Paulus. 2007. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (9): 2687–2691.CrossRef Antal, A., D. Terney, C. Poreisz, and W. Paulus. 2007. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (9): 2687–2691.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2): 77–101.CrossRef Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2): 77–101.CrossRef
55.
56.
go back to reference Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, et al. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity. 52 (4): 1893–1907.CrossRef Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, et al. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity. 52 (4): 1893–1907.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Palm U, Kumpf U, Behler N, Wulf L, Kirsch B, Wörsching J, et al. 2018. Home Use, Remotely Supervised, and Remotely Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 21(4):323–33 Palm U, Kumpf U, Behler N, Wulf L, Kirsch B, Wörsching J, et al. 2018. Home Use, Remotely Supervised, and Remotely Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 21(4):323–33
59.
go back to reference Sierawska, A., V. Moliadze, M. Splittgerber, A. Rogge, M. Siniatchkin, and A. Buyx. 2020. First Epileptic Seizure and Initial Diagnosis of Juvenile Myoclonus Epilepsy (JME) in a Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Study– Ethical Analysis of a Clinical case. Neuroethics 13 (3): 347–351.CrossRef Sierawska, A., V. Moliadze, M. Splittgerber, A. Rogge, M. Siniatchkin, and A. Buyx. 2020. First Epileptic Seizure and Initial Diagnosis of Juvenile Myoclonus Epilepsy (JME) in a Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Study– Ethical Analysis of a Clinical case. Neuroethics 13 (3): 347–351.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Buchanan, DM, D'Angiulli, A, Samson, A, Maisonneuve, AR, Robaey, P. 2022. Acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with ADHD: The point of view of parents. Journal of Health Psychology 27 (1): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320937059 Buchanan, DM, D'Angiulli, A, Samson, A, Maisonneuve, AR, Robaey, P. 2022. Acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with ADHD: The point of view of parents. Journal of Health Psychology 27 (1): 36–46. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1359105320937059​
61.
go back to reference Sierawska, A., A. Prehn-Kristensen, H. Brauer, K. Krauel, C. Breitling-Ziegler, M. Siniatchkin, et al. 2021. Transcranial direct-current stimulation and pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-Findings from an interview ethics study with children, adolescents, and their parents. Progress in Brain Research 264: 363–386.CrossRef Sierawska, A., A. Prehn-Kristensen, H. Brauer, K. Krauel, C. Breitling-Ziegler, M. Siniatchkin, et al. 2021. Transcranial direct-current stimulation and pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-Findings from an interview ethics study with children, adolescents, and their parents. Progress in Brain Research 264: 363–386.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Stunkel, L., and C. Grady. 2011. More than the money: A review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations. Contemporary Clinical Trials 32 (3): 342–352.CrossRef Stunkel, L., and C. Grady. 2011. More than the money: A review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations. Contemporary Clinical Trials 32 (3): 342–352.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Rice, M., and M.E. Broome. 2004. Incentives for Children in Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 36 (2): 167–172.CrossRef Rice, M., and M.E. Broome. 2004. Incentives for Children in Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 36 (2): 167–172.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Broome ME, Kodish E, Geller G, Siminoff LA. 2003 Children in research: new perspectives and practices for informed consent. Irb Suppl 25(5):S20-s3 Broome ME, Kodish E, Geller G, Siminoff LA. 2003 Children in research: new perspectives and practices for informed consent. Irb Suppl 25(5):S20-s3
65.
go back to reference Sabini, J., and J. Monterosso. 2005. Judgments of the fairness of using performance enhancing drugs. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1): 81–94.CrossRef Sabini, J., and J. Monterosso. 2005. Judgments of the fairness of using performance enhancing drugs. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1): 81–94.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Schuijer, J.W., I.M. de Jong, F. Kupper, and N.M. van Atteveldt. 2017. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Cognitive Performance of Healthy Minors: A Complex Governance Challenge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 142.CrossRef Schuijer, J.W., I.M. de Jong, F. Kupper, and N.M. van Atteveldt. 2017. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Cognitive Performance of Healthy Minors: A Complex Governance Challenge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 142.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Lavazza, A. 2017. Can Neuromodulation also Enhance Social Inequality? Some Possible Indirect Interventions of the State. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 113.CrossRef Lavazza, A. 2017. Can Neuromodulation also Enhance Social Inequality? Some Possible Indirect Interventions of the State. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 113.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Horvath JC. 2019. 18 - Noninvasive brain stimulation: When the hype transcends the evidence. In: Raz A, Thibault RT, editors. Casting Light on the Dark Side of Brain Imaging: Academic Press. p. 107–11. Horvath JC. 2019. 18 - Noninvasive brain stimulation: When the hype transcends the evidence. In: Raz A, Thibault RT, editors. Casting Light on the Dark Side of Brain Imaging: Academic Press. p. 107–11.
69.
go back to reference Vaughan, B.S., J.S. March, and C.J. Kratochvil. 2012. The evidence-based pharmacological treatment of paediatric ADHD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 15 (1): 27–39.CrossRef Vaughan, B.S., J.S. March, and C.J. Kratochvil. 2012. The evidence-based pharmacological treatment of paediatric ADHD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 15 (1): 27–39.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Kekic, M., E. Boysen, I.C. Campbell, and U. Schmidt. 2016. A systematic review of the clinical efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 74: 70–86.CrossRef Kekic, M., E. Boysen, I.C. Campbell, and U. Schmidt. 2016. A systematic review of the clinical efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 74: 70–86.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Wagner, K., H. Maslen, J. Oakley, and J. Savulescu. 2018. Would you be willing to zap your child’s brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (1): 29–38.CrossRef Wagner, K., H. Maslen, J. Oakley, and J. Savulescu. 2018. Would you be willing to zap your child’s brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (1): 29–38.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Wurzman, R., R.H. Hamilton, A. Pascual-Leone, and M.D. Fox. 2016. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Annals of Neurology. 80 (1): 1–4.CrossRef Wurzman, R., R.H. Hamilton, A. Pascual-Leone, and M.D. Fox. 2016. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Annals of Neurology. 80 (1): 1–4.CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Hereu, P., E. Pérez, I. Fuentes, X. Vidal, P. Suñé, and J.M. Arnau. 2010. Consent in clinical trials: What do patients know? Contemporary Clinical Trials 31 (5): 443–446.CrossRef Hereu, P., E. Pérez, I. Fuentes, X. Vidal, P. Suñé, and J.M. Arnau. 2010. Consent in clinical trials: What do patients know? Contemporary Clinical Trials 31 (5): 443–446.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Sherlock, A., and S. Brownie. 2014. Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: A literature review. ANZ Journal of Surgery 84 (4): 207–210.CrossRef Sherlock, A., and S. Brownie. 2014. Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: A literature review. ANZ Journal of Surgery 84 (4): 207–210.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Tam, N.T., N.T. Huy, T.B. le Thoa, N.P. Long, N.T. Trang, K. Hirayama, et al. 2015. Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93 (3): 186–198.CrossRef Tam, N.T., N.T. Huy, T.B. le Thoa, N.P. Long, N.T. Trang, K. Hirayama, et al. 2015. Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93 (3): 186–198.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Horvath, J.C., J.D. Forte, and O. Carter. 2015. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review. Neuropsychologia 66: 213–236.CrossRef Horvath, J.C., J.D. Forte, and O. Carter. 2015. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review. Neuropsychologia 66: 213–236.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Pediatric Populations—– Voices from Typically Developing Children and Adolescents and their Parents
Authors
Anna Sierawska
Maike Splittgerber
Vera Moliadze
Michael Siniatchkin
Alena Buyx
Publication date
01-04-2023
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Neuroethics / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1874-5490
Electronic ISSN: 1874-5504
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09507-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Neuroethics 1/2023 Go to the issue

Advances in Alzheimer's

Alzheimer's Disease Independent Medical Education

Alzheimer's research and care is changing rapidly. Keep up with the latest developments from key international conferences, together with expert insights on how to integrate these advances into practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more