Top

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Open Access 04-01-2025 | Original Article

Toward structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality

Authors: Lovis Schwenderling, Laura Isabel Hanke, Undine Holst, Florentine Huettl, Fabian Joeres, Tobias Huber, Christian Hansen

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Abstract

Purpose:

Structured abdominal examination is an essential part of the medical curriculum and surgical training, requiring a blend of theory and practice from trainees. Current training methods, however, often do not provide adequate engagement, fail to address individual learning needs or do not cover rare diseases.

Methods:

In this work, an application for structured Abdominal Examination Training using Augmented Reality (AETAR) is presented. Required theoretical knowledge is displayed step by step via virtual indicators directly on the associated body regions. Exercises facilitate building up the routine in performing the examination. AETAR was evaluated in an exploratory user study with medical students (n=12) and teaching surgeons (n=2).

Results:

Learning with AETAR was described as fun and beneficial. Usability (SUS=73) and rated suitability for teaching were promising. All students improved in a knowledge test and felt more confident with the abdominal examination. Shortcomings were identified in the area of interaction, especially in teaching examination-specific movements.

Conclusion:

AETAR represents a first approach to structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality. The application demonstrates the potential to improve educational outcomes for medical students and provides an important foundation for future research and development in digital medical education.

Available only for authorised users

https://limbsandthings.com/global/products/60000-abdominal-examination-trainer-light-skin-tone Retrieved 28 October 2024.

https://github.com/Microsoft/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity Retrieved 22 March 2024.

Hamm RM, Kelley DM, Medina JA, Syed NS, Harris GA, Papa FJ (2022) Effects of using an abdominal simulator to develop palpatory competencies in 3rd year medical students. BMC Medical Education 22(1)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03126-y

Garzón J (2021) An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education. Multimodal Technol Interaction 5(7):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070037CrossRef

Mayer RE, Fiorella L (2014) Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 279–315. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139547369.015

Buchner J, Buntins K, Kerres M (2021) The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. J Computer Assisted Learning 38(1):285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617CrossRef

Nugroho A, Permanasari AE, Hantono BS (2022) Augmented reality implementation for human anatomy learning in medical education: A review. In: 2022 8th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET), pp. 256–260. IEEE, Malang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/icet56879.2022.9990829

Gerup J, Soerensen CB, Dieckmann P (2020) Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review. Inter J Medical Edu 11:1–18. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.eb1aCrossRef

Moro C, Birt J, Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Clark J, Glasziou P, Scott AM (2021) Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical Sci Edu 14(3):368–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2049CrossRef

McBain KA, Habib R, Laggis G, Quaiattini A, M Ventura N, Noel GPJC (2022) Scoping review: The use of augmented reality in clinical anatomical education and its assessment tools. Anatomical Sciences Education 15(4), 765–796 https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2155

Kolecki R, Pregowska A, Dabrowa J, Skuciński J, Pulanecki T, Walecki P, Dam PM, Dudek D, Richter P, Proniewska K (2022) Assessment of the utility of mixed reality in medical education. Trans Res Anatomy 28:100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2022.100214CrossRef

10.

Cakmak YO, Daniel BK, Hammer N, Yilmaz O, Irmak EC, Khwaounjoo P (2020) The human muscular arm avatar as an interactive visualization tool in learning anatomy: Medical students’ perspectives. IEEE Trans Learning Technol 13(3):593–603. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2020.2995163CrossRef

11.

Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C (2021) Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: Systematic review. JMIR Serious Games 9(3):29080. https://doi.org/10.2196/29080CrossRef

12.

Chang H-Y, Binali T, Liang J-C, Chiou G-L, Cheng K-H, Lee SW-Y, Tsai C-C (2022) Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Comput Edu 191:104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641CrossRef

13.

Sen A, Chuen CLK, Liew SH, Hta ACZ (2017) Augmented reality as a tool for authentic learning of clinical skills in early years of medical training. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp. 231–242. Springer, Dublin, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74310-3_25

14.

Pieterse AD, Hierck BP, Jong PGM, Kroese J, Willems LNA, Reinders MEJ (2020) Design and implementation of “AugMedicine: Lung cases, ” an augmented reality application for the medical curriculum on the presentation of dyspnea. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 1[SPACE]https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.577534

15.

Sherstyuk A, Vincent D, Berg B, Treskunov A (2011) Mixed reality manikins for medical education. In: Handbook of Augmented Reality, pp. 479–500. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_23

16.

Asadipour A, Debattista K, Patel V, Chalmers A (2020) A technology-aided multi-modal training approach to assist abdominal palpation training and its assessment in medical education. Inter J Human-Compt Studies 137:102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102394CrossRef

17.

Muangpoon T, Osgouei RH, Escobar-Castillejos D, Kontovounisios C, Bello F (2020) Augmented reality system for digital rectal examination training and assessment: System validation. J Medical Internet Res 22(8):18637. https://doi.org/10.2196/18637CrossRef

18.

Palumbo A (2022) Microsoft HoloLens 2 in medical and healthcare context: State of the art and future prospects. Sensors 22(20):7709. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Füeßl HS, Middeke M (eds) (2022) Duale Reihe Anamnese und Klinische Untersuchung. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

20.

Lehmeyer L (2006) BASICS Anamnese und Untersuchung. Basics. Urban & Fischer in Elsevier, Munich, Germany

21.

Neurath MF, Lohse AW (2015) Checkliste Anamnese und Klinische Untersuchung. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, GermanyCrossRef

22.

Brooke J (1996) SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189(194):4–7

23.

Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual sus scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Studies 4(3):114–123

24.

Rejeb A, Keogh JG, Leong GK, Treiblmaier H (2021) Potentials and challenges of augmented reality smart glasses in logistics and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Inter J Production Res 59(12):3747–3776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876942CrossRef

25.

Lee S, Shetty AS, Cavuoto LA (2024) Modeling of learning processes using continuous-time markov chain for virtual-reality-based surgical training in laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Trans on Learning Technol 17:462–473. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2023.3236899CrossRef

26.

Bork F, Lehner A, Eck U, Navab N, Waschke J, Kugelmann D (2020) The effectiveness of collaborative augmented reality in gross anatomy teaching: A quantitative and qualitative pilot study. Anatomical Sci Edu 14(5):590–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2016CrossRef

27.

Bölek KA, De Jong G, Zee CEEM, Walsum A, Henssen DJHA (2021) Mixed-methods exploration of students’ motivation in using augmented reality in neuroanatomy education with prosected specimens. Anatomical Sci Edu 15(5):839–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2116CrossRef

28.

Rothe S, Buschek D, Hußmann H (2019) Guidance in Cinematic Virtual Reality-Taxonomy, Research Status and Challenges. Multimodal Technol Interaction 3(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3010019CrossRef

Title: Toward structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality
Authors: Lovis Schwenderling
Laura Isabel Hanke
Undine Holst
Florentine Huettl
Fabian Joeres
Tobias Huber
Christian Hansen
Publication date: 04-01-2025
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03311-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Springer Medicine

Toward structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality

Abstract

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Please log in to get access to this content