The optimal choice for patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups

go back to reference Nassour I, Choti MA, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Wang SC, Polanco PM (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(6):2907–2913PubMedCrossRef Nassour I, Choti MA, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Wang SC, Polanco PM (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(6):2907–2913PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Yin T, Qin T, Wei K, Shen M, Zhang Z, Wen J, Pan S, Guo X, Zhu F, Wang M, Zhang H, Hilal MA, Qin R (2022) Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 105:106799PubMedCrossRef Yin T, Qin T, Wei K, Shen M, Zhang Z, Wen J, Pan S, Guo X, Zhu F, Wang M, Zhang H, Hilal MA, Qin R (2022) Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 105:106799PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, Irfan A, Schmocker RK, Sereni E, Kinny-Koster B, Wright M, Groot VP, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Makary M, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J (2021) Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25(7):1795–1804PubMedCrossRef van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, Irfan A, Schmocker RK, Sereni E, Kinny-Koster B, Wright M, Groot VP, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Makary M, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J (2021) Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25(7):1795–1804PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Guo W, Ye X, Li J, Lu S, Wang M, Wang Z, Yao J, Yu S, Yuan G, He S (2022) Comparison of surgical outcomes among open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Surg 22(1):348PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guo W, Ye X, Li J, Lu S, Wang M, Wang Z, Yao J, Yu S, Yuan G, He S (2022) Comparison of surgical outcomes among open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Surg 22(1):348PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, D’Angelica MI, Balduzzi A, Bassi C, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Callery MP, Del CM, Coimbra FJ, Conrad C, Cook A, Coppola A, Dervenis C, Dokmak S, Edil BH, Edwin B, Giulianotti PC, Han HS, Hansen PD, van der Heijde N, van Hilst J, Hester CA, Hogg ME, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Keck T, Kim SC, Khatkov IE, Kokudo N, Kooby DA, Korrel M, de Leon FJ, Lluis N, Lof S, Machado MA, Demartines N, Martinie JB, Merchant NB, Molenaar IQ, Moravek C, Mou YP, Nakamura M, Nealon WH, Palanivelu C, Pessaux P, Pitt HA, Polanco PM, Primrose JN, Rawashdeh A, Sanford DE, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Stauffer JA, Takaori K, Talamonti MS, Tang CN, Vollmer CM, Wakabayashi G, Walsh RM, Wang SE, Zinner MJ, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Zwart MJ, Conlon KC, Kendrick ML, Zeh HJ, Hilal MA, Besselink MG (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. ANN SURG 271(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, D’Angelica MI, Balduzzi A, Bassi C, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, Callery MP, Del CM, Coimbra FJ, Conrad C, Cook A, Coppola A, Dervenis C, Dokmak S, Edil BH, Edwin B, Giulianotti PC, Han HS, Hansen PD, van der Heijde N, van Hilst J, Hester CA, Hogg ME, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Keck T, Kim SC, Khatkov IE, Kokudo N, Kooby DA, Korrel M, de Leon FJ, Lluis N, Lof S, Machado MA, Demartines N, Martinie JB, Merchant NB, Molenaar IQ, Moravek C, Mou YP, Nakamura M, Nealon WH, Palanivelu C, Pessaux P, Pitt HA, Polanco PM, Primrose JN, Rawashdeh A, Sanford DE, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Stauffer JA, Takaori K, Talamonti MS, Tang CN, Vollmer CM, Wakabayashi G, Walsh RM, Wang SE, Zinner MJ, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Zwart MJ, Conlon KC, Kendrick ML, Zeh HJ, Hilal MA, Besselink MG (2020) The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. ANN SURG 271(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW, Makris MC, Mitrousias A, Petrou A, Felekouras E, Michalinos A, Vailas M, Schizas D, Papalampros A (2017) Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 31(11):4382–4392PubMedCrossRef Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW, Makris MC, Mitrousias A, Petrou A, Felekouras E, Michalinos A, Vailas M, Schizas D, Papalampros A (2017) Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 31(11):4382–4392PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605PubMedCrossRef Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, Gheza F, Fernandes E, Masrur MA, Gangemi A, Bianco FM (2018) Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique : Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 32(10):4329–4336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, Gheza F, Fernandes E, Masrur MA, Gangemi A, Bianco FM (2018) Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique : Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 32(10):4329–4336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Hoehn RS, Nassour I, Adam MA, Winters S, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH (2021) National trends in robotic pancreas surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 25(4):983–990PubMedCrossRef Hoehn RS, Nassour I, Adam MA, Winters S, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH (2021) National trends in robotic pancreas surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 25(4):983–990PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Bodner J, Augustin F, Wykypiel H, Fish J, Muehlmann G, Wetscher G, Schmid T (2005) The da Vinci robotic system for general surgical applications: a critical interim appraisal. Swiss Med WKLY 135(45–46):674–678PubMed Bodner J, Augustin F, Wykypiel H, Fish J, Muehlmann G, Wetscher G, Schmid T (2005) The da Vinci robotic system for general surgical applications: a critical interim appraisal. Swiss Med WKLY 135(45–46):674–678PubMed

go back to reference Velasquez CA, Navkar NV, Alsaied A, Balakrishnan S, Abinahed J, Al-Ansari AA, Jong YW (2016) Preliminary design of an actuated imaging probe for generation of additional visual cues in a robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 30(6):2641–2648PubMedCrossRef Velasquez CA, Navkar NV, Alsaied A, Balakrishnan S, Abinahed J, Al-Ansari AA, Jong YW (2016) Preliminary design of an actuated imaging probe for generation of additional visual cues in a robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 30(6):2641–2648PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Zhao GD, Zhang X, Xu Y (2017) The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc 31(6):2380–2386PubMedCrossRef Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Zhao GD, Zhang X, Xu Y (2017) The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc 31(6):2380–2386PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Kalabin A, Mani VR, Kruse RL, Schlesselman C, Li KY, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, Kimchi ET (2023) New perspectives on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. World J Gastro Surg 15(1):60–71CrossRef Kalabin A, Mani VR, Kruse RL, Schlesselman C, Li KY, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, Kimchi ET (2023) New perspectives on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. World J Gastro Surg 15(1):60–71CrossRef

go back to reference Gall TM, Pencavel TD, Cunningham D, Nicol D, Jiao LR (2020) Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 22(11):1637–1644PubMedCrossRef Gall TM, Pencavel TD, Cunningham D, Nicol D, Jiao LR (2020) Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 22(11):1637–1644PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Di Martino M, Caruso R, D’Ovidio A, Nunez-Alfonsel J, Burdio PF, Quijano CY, Vicente E, Ielpo B (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome. Int J Med Robot Comp 17(5):e2295CrossRef Di Martino M, Caruso R, D’Ovidio A, Nunez-Alfonsel J, Burdio PF, Quijano CY, Vicente E, Ielpo B (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome. Int J Med Robot Comp 17(5):e2295CrossRef

go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906PubMedCrossRef Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Probst P, Grummich K, Heger P, Zaschke S, Knebel P, Ulrich A, Buchler MW, Diener MK (2016) Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study. Syst Rev-London 5:48CrossRef Probst P, Grummich K, Heger P, Zaschke S, Knebel P, Ulrich A, Buchler MW, Diener MK (2016) Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study. Syst Rev-London 5:48CrossRef

go back to reference Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 10(10):142 Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 10(10):142

go back to reference Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. STAT METHODS MED RES 27(6):1785–1805PubMedCrossRef Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. STAT METHODS MED RES 27(6):1785–1805PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Shi J, Luo D, Weng H, Zeng XT, Lin L, Chu H, Tong T (2020) Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary. Res Synth Methods 11(5):641–654PubMedCrossRef Shi J, Luo D, Weng H, Zeng XT, Lin L, Chu H, Tong T (2020) Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary. Res Synth Methods 11(5):641–654PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Shi J, Luo D, Wan X, Liu Y, Liu J, Bian Z, Tong T (2023) Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 32(7):1338–1360PubMedCrossRef Shi J, Luo D, Wan X, Liu Y, Liu J, Bian Z, Tong T (2023) Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 32(7):1338–1360PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Aziz H, Shahjehan F, Maegawa F, Zeeshan M, Riall T, Jie T (2018) Analysis of outcomes of open, robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy using NSQIP. J Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.042CrossRef Aziz H, Shahjehan F, Maegawa F, Zeeshan M, Riall T, Jie T (2018) Analysis of outcomes of open, robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy using NSQIP. J Pancreas. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​hpb.​2018.​02.​042CrossRef

go back to reference Chao YJ, Lu WH, Liao TK, Su PJ, Wang CJ, Lai CH, Hung JY, Su PF, Shan YS (2023) Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sci Rep-UK 13(1):6190CrossRef Chao YJ, Lu WH, Liao TK, Su PJ, Wang CJ, Lai CH, Hung JY, Su PF, Shan YS (2023) Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sci Rep-UK 13(1):6190CrossRef

go back to reference Emmen A, Gorgec B, Zwart M, Daams F, Erdmann J, Festen S, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM, van Hilst J, Kazemier G, Lof S, Sussenbach SI, Tanis PJ, Zonderhuis BM, Busch OR, Swijnenburg RJ, Besselink MG (2023) Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections. Surg Endosc 37(4):2659–2672PubMedCrossRef Emmen A, Gorgec B, Zwart M, Daams F, Erdmann J, Festen S, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM, van Hilst J, Kazemier G, Lof S, Sussenbach SI, Tanis PJ, Zonderhuis BM, Busch OR, Swijnenburg RJ, Besselink MG (2023) Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections. Surg Endosc 37(4):2659–2672PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference van der Heijde N, Vissers FL, Manzoni A, Zimmitti G, Balsells J, Berrevoet F, Bjornsson B, van den Boezem P, Boggi U, Bratlie SO, Burdio F, Coratti A, D’Hondt M, Del PC, Dokmak S, Fara R, Can MF, Festen S, Forgione A, Fristrup C, Gaujoux S, Groot KB, Hackert T, Khatkov IE, Keck T, Seppanen H, Lips D, Luyer M, Pittau G, Maglione M, Molenaar IQ, Pessaux P, Roeyen G, Saint-Marc O, Cabus SS, van Santvoort H, van der Schelling G, Serradilla-Martin M, Souche FR, Suarez MM, Marino MV, Besselink MG, Abu HM (2023) Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry. HPB 25(4):400–408PubMedCrossRef van der Heijde N, Vissers FL, Manzoni A, Zimmitti G, Balsells J, Berrevoet F, Bjornsson B, van den Boezem P, Boggi U, Bratlie SO, Burdio F, Coratti A, D’Hondt M, Del PC, Dokmak S, Fara R, Can MF, Festen S, Forgione A, Fristrup C, Gaujoux S, Groot KB, Hackert T, Khatkov IE, Keck T, Seppanen H, Lips D, Luyer M, Pittau G, Maglione M, Molenaar IQ, Pessaux P, Roeyen G, Saint-Marc O, Cabus SS, van Santvoort H, van der Schelling G, Serradilla-Martin M, Souche FR, Suarez MM, Marino MV, Besselink MG, Abu HM (2023) Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry. HPB 25(4):400–408PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Kim H, Choi SH, Jang JY, Choi M, Lee JH, Kang CM (2022) Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses. J Hepato-Bil-Pan Sci 29(3):311–321 Kim H, Choi SH, Jang JY, Choi M, Lee JH, Kang CM (2022) Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses. J Hepato-Bil-Pan Sci 29(3):311–321

go back to reference Naffouje SA, Kamarajah SK, Denbo JW, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS (2022) Surgical approach does not affect return to intended oncologic therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a propensity-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 29(12):7793–7803PubMedCrossRef Naffouje SA, Kamarajah SK, Denbo JW, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS (2022) Surgical approach does not affect return to intended oncologic therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a propensity-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 29(12):7793–7803PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, Augustine MM, Polanco PM, Mansour JC, Minter RM (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21(11):1784–1792PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, Augustine MM, Polanco PM, Mansour JC, Minter RM (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21(11):1784–1792PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Park SE, Choi HJ, You YK, Hong TH (2021) Effectiveness and stability of robot-assisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 100(6):329–337PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Park SE, Choi HJ, You YK, Hong TH (2021) Effectiveness and stability of robot-assisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 100(6):329–337PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Tyutyunnik P, Klompmaker S, Lombardo C, Lapshyn H, Menonna F, Napoli N, Wellner U, Izrailov R, Baychorov M, Besselink MG, Abu HM, Fingerhut A, Boggi U, Keck T, Khatkov I (2022) Learning curve of three European centers in laparoscopic, hybrid laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. SURG ENDOSC 36(2):1515–1526PubMedCrossRef Tyutyunnik P, Klompmaker S, Lombardo C, Lapshyn H, Menonna F, Napoli N, Wellner U, Izrailov R, Baychorov M, Besselink MG, Abu HM, Fingerhut A, Boggi U, Keck T, Khatkov I (2022) Learning curve of three European centers in laparoscopic, hybrid laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. SURG ENDOSC 36(2):1515–1526PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Xourafas D, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM (2018) Independent predictors of increased operative time and hospital length of stay are consistent across different surgical approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 22(11):1911–1919PubMedCrossRef Xourafas D, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM (2018) Independent predictors of increased operative time and hospital length of stay are consistent across different surgical approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 22(11):1911–1919PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Zhang Y, Hong D, Zhang C, Hu Z (2018) Total laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. BIOSCI TRENDS 12(5):484–490PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Hong D, Zhang C, Hu Z (2018) Total laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. BIOSCI TRENDS 12(5):484–490PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Zimmerman AM, Roye DG, Charpentier KP (2018) A comparison of outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 20(4):364–369PubMedCrossRef Zimmerman AM, Roye DG, Charpentier KP (2018) A comparison of outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB 20(4):364–369PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Zong K, Luo K, Chen K, Ye J, Liu W, Zhai W (2022) A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center experience. FRONT ONCOL 12:960241PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zong K, Luo K, Chen K, Ye J, Liu W, Zhai W (2022) A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center experience. FRONT ONCOL 12:960241PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, Goh B (2021) Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. SURGERY 170(1):194–206PubMedCrossRef Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, Goh B (2021) Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. SURGERY 170(1):194–206PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference van Ramshorst T, van Bodegraven EA, Zampedri P, Kasai M, Besselink MG, Abu HM (2023) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups. Surg Endosc 37(6):4131–4143PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef van Ramshorst T, van Bodegraven EA, Zampedri P, Kasai M, Besselink MG, Abu HM (2023) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups. Surg Endosc 37(6):4131–4143PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Zanagnolo V, Garbi A, Achilarre MT, Minig L (2017) Robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancers. J Minim Invas Gyn 24(3):379–396CrossRef Zanagnolo V, Garbi A, Achilarre MT, Minig L (2017) Robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancers. J Minim Invas Gyn 24(3):379–396CrossRef

go back to reference Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 318(16):1569–1580CrossRef

go back to reference Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroentero 25(28):3722–3737CrossRef Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroentero 25(28):3722–3737CrossRef

go back to reference Zhang B, Xu Z, Gu W, Zhou J, Tang N, Zhang S, Chen C, Zhang Z (2023) Postoperative complications and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 21(1):26PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang B, Xu Z, Gu W, Zhou J, Tang N, Zhang S, Chen C, Zhang Z (2023) Postoperative complications and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 21(1):26PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Watanabe J, Otani S, Sakamoto T, Arai Y, Hanaki T, Amisaki M, Tokuyasu N, Honjo S, Ikeguchi M (2016) Prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Today 46(11):1258–1267PubMedCrossRef Watanabe J, Otani S, Sakamoto T, Arai Y, Hanaki T, Amisaki M, Tokuyasu N, Honjo S, Ikeguchi M (2016) Prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Today 46(11):1258–1267PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Yu ZH, Du MM, Zhang X, Suo JJ, Zeng T, Xie XL, Xiao W, Lu QB, Liu YX, Yao HW (2024) The impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative healthcare-associated infections and clinical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a ten-year retrospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis 24(1):361PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yu ZH, Du MM, Zhang X, Suo JJ, Zeng T, Xie XL, Xiao W, Lu QB, Liu YX, Yao HW (2024) The impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative healthcare-associated infections and clinical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a ten-year retrospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis 24(1):361PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

go back to reference Pedrazzoli S (2015) Extent of lymphadenectomy to associate with pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic head cancer for better tumor staging. Cancer Treat Rev 41(7):577–587PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S (2015) Extent of lymphadenectomy to associate with pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic head cancer for better tumor staging. Cancer Treat Rev 41(7):577–587PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andren-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Buchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600PubMedCrossRef Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andren-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Buchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Seo HS, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2015) Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy. J Surg Res 194(2):361–366PubMedCrossRef Seo HS, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2015) Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy. J Surg Res 194(2):361–366PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Mungo B, Hammad A, AlMasri S, Dogeas E, Nassour I, Singhi AD, Zeh HR, Hogg ME, Lee K, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A (2023) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic and Ampullary disease: is robotic surgery the better approach? Surg Endosc 37(2):1157–1165PubMedCrossRef Mungo B, Hammad A, AlMasri S, Dogeas E, Nassour I, Singhi AD, Zeh HR, Hogg ME, Lee K, Zureikat AH, Paniccia A (2023) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic and Ampullary disease: is robotic surgery the better approach? Surg Endosc 37(2):1157–1165PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Wang W, Zhang Z, Gu C, Liu Q, Liang Z, He W, Chen J, Lai J (2018) The optimal choice for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Surg 57:111–116PubMedCrossRef Wang W, Zhang Z, Gu C, Liu Q, Liang Z, He W, Chen J, Lai J (2018) The optimal choice for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Surg 57:111–116PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Yanagimoto H, Yamaki S, Kosaka H, Hirooka S, Kotsuka M, Ryota H, Michiura T, Inoue K, Matsui Y (2019) Does modified Blumgart anastomosis without intra-pancreatic ductal stenting reduce post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy? Asian J Surg 42(1):343–349PubMedCrossRef Satoi S, Yamamoto T, Yanagimoto H, Yamaki S, Kosaka H, Hirooka S, Kotsuka M, Ryota H, Michiura T, Inoue K, Matsui Y (2019) Does modified Blumgart anastomosis without intra-pancreatic ductal stenting reduce post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy? Asian J Surg 42(1):343–349PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Zhou M, Zhong G, Sun H, Zhu Q, Wang Z (2023) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EJSO-Eur J Surg Onc 49(11):107092CrossRef Zhou M, Zhong G, Sun H, Zhu Q, Wang Z (2023) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EJSO-Eur J Surg Onc 49(11):107092CrossRef

go back to reference Camilleri M, Sanders KM (2022) Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 162(1):68–87PubMedCrossRef Camilleri M, Sanders KM (2022) Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 162(1):68–87PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Grover M, Farrugia G, Stanghellini V (2019) Gastroparesis: a turning point in understanding and treatment. Gut 68(12):2238–2250PubMedCrossRef Grover M, Farrugia G, Stanghellini V (2019) Gastroparesis: a turning point in understanding and treatment. Gut 68(12):2238–2250PubMedCrossRef

go back to reference Lattimore CM, Kane WJ, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM (2021) The impact of obesity and severe obesity on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 170(5):1538–1545PubMedCrossRef Lattimore CM, Kane WJ, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM (2021) The impact of obesity and severe obesity on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 170(5):1538–1545PubMedCrossRef