Top

28-09-2024 | Original Article

The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence

Authors: Julia Belton, Meredith J. Awrey, Gabriela D. B. Sheinin, Calvin M. Langton

Published in: Journal of Family Violence

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of gender, sexual orientation, and mental health labels on mock jurors’ verdicts and perceptions in a case of intimate partner violence (IPV). It was hypothesized that: (1) defendants with a mental health label would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty and less credible than those with no label, (2) male defendants would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty than females, and (3) heterosexual defendants would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty than homosexual defendants.

Method

A sample of 314 undergraduate participants responded to a court case summary in which defendant mental health label (psychopathic traits, antisocial personality disorder [ASPD], or no label), defendant and victim gender (male or female), and sexual orientation (heterosexual or homosexual) were systematically varied.

Results

Defendants with mental health labels (psychopathy or ASPD) were more likely to receive a guilty verdict and were perceived as more guilty and less credible than those with no label. Male defendants were perceived as more guilty than female defendants. Heterosexual male defendants with female victims were seen as more guilty than heterosexual couples with a female defendant or either same-sex pairing.

Conclusions

These findings suggest gender-based biases and a general labeling bias in perceptions of IPV.

Available only for authorised users

American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

American Psychiatric Association, D. S., & American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Vol. 5). American Psychiatric Association.

Baker, N. L., Buick, J. D., Kim, S. R., Moniz, S., & Nava, K. L. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69(3–4), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0218-3CrossRef

Bates, E. A., Klement, K. R., Kaye, L. K., & Pennington, C. R. (2019). The impact of gendered stereotypes on perceptions of violence: A commentary. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 81(1–2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01029-9CrossRef

Berg, J. M., Smith, S. F., Watts, A. L., Ammirati, R., Green, S. E., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Misconceptions regarding psychopathic personality: Implications for clinical practice and research. Neuropsychiatry, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2217/npy.12.69CrossRef

Blais, J., & Forth, A. E. (2014). Potential labeling effects: Influence of psychopathy diagnosis, defendant age, and defendant gender on mock juror’’ decisions. Psychology Crime & Law, 20(2), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.749473CrossRef

Bornstein, B. H., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J., Kimbrough, C., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., & Luecht, K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000223CrossRefPubMed

Coid, J., & Yang, M. (2011). The impact of psychopathy on violence among the household population of Great Britain. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 46(6), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-010-0212-4CrossRef

Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7CrossRefPubMed

Collison, K. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2021). Personality disorders as predictors of intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102047. Article 102047.

Conroy, E., Willmott, D., Murphy, A., & Widanaralalage, B. K. (2023). Does perpetrator gender influence attitudes towards intimate partner violence (IPV)? Examining the relationship between male-perpetrated and female-perpetrated IPV attitudes among a sample of UK young adults. Mental Health and Social Inclusion. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-05-2023-0057CrossRef

Curley, L., & Neuhaus, T. (2024). Are legal experts better decision makers than jurors? A psychological evaluation of the role of juries in the 21st century. Journal of Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-12-2023-0079CrossRef

Curley, L. J., & Peddie, N. (2024). A critique of the experimental study of juror decision-making. In N. Monaghan (Ed.), Contemporary Challenges in the Jury System: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 189–206). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399452-12

Curley, L. J., Munro, J., & Dror, I. E. (2022). Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making. Medicine Science and the Law, 62(3), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024221080655CrossRefPubMed

Dardis, C. M., Edwards, K. M., Kelley, E. L., & Gidycz, C. A. (2017). Perceptions of dating violence and associated correlates: A study of college young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3245–3271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515597439CrossRefPubMed

Debowska, A., Boduszek, D., Willmott, D., & Jones, A. D. (2019). The none in three victim responsiveness Assessment (Ni3: VRA): A new outcome measure for intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention programs. Journal of Children’s Services, 14(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-12-2018-0029CrossRef

Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labelled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(5), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.660CrossRef

Erickson, K. A., Jonnson, M., Langille, J. I., & Walsh, Z. (2017). Victim gender, rater attitudes, and rater violence history influence perceptions of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 32(3), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00086CrossRefPubMed

Giger, J., Gonçalves, G., & Almeida, A. S. (2017). Adaptation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale to Portuguese and tests of its convergent, divergent, and predictive validities. Violence Against Women, 23(14), 1790–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216666724

Green, K., & Browne, K. (2020). Personality disorder traits, trauma, and risk in perpetrators of domestic violence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(2–3), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19826516CrossRefPubMed

Hamby, S., & Jackson, A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 63(5–6), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9816-0CrossRef

Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The balanced inventory of desirable responding short form (BIDR-16). Sage Open, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401562111CrossRef

Hodell, E. C., Wasarhaley, N. E., Lynch, K. R., & Golding, J. M. (2014). Mock juror gender biases and perceptions of self-defense claims in intimate partner homicide. Journal of Family Violence, 29(5), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9609-2CrossRef

Lewandowicz-Machnikowska, M., Grzyb, T., Dolinski, D., & Kulesza, W. (2023). Gender biases in legal decision-making: An exploration of judicial and public perceptions across multiple offences. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 14(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-07-2023-0049CrossRef

Lilley, C., Willmott, D., Mojtahedi, D., & Labhardt, D. (2023a). Intimate partner rape: A review of six core myths surrounding women’s conduct and the consequences of intimate partner rape. Social Sciences, 12(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010034CrossRef

Lilley, C., Willmott, D., & Mojtahedi, D. (2023b). Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1086026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1086026CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Little, B., & Terrance, C. (2010). Perceptions of domestic violence in lesbian relationships: Stereotypes and gender role expectations. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903543170CrossRefPubMed

Lloyd, C. D., Clark, H. J., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between Psychopathy Checklist revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X468432CrossRef

McCarrick, J., Davis-McCabe, C., & Hirst-Winthrop, S. (2016). Men’s experiences of the criminal justice system following female perpetrated intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9749-zCrossRef

Neumann, C. S., Schmitt, D. S., Carter, R., Embley, I., & Hare, R. D. (2012). Psychopathic traits in females and males across the globe. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(5), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2038CrossRef

Parker, M. M., Mattson, R. E., Alexander, E. F., & McKinnon, A. M. (2022). Does perceived injury explain the effects of gender on attributions of blame for intimate partner violence? A factorial vignette analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 37(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00229-2

Peters, J. (2008). Measuring myths about domestic violence: Development and initial validation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801917780

Poorman, P. B., Seelau, E. P., & Seelau, S. M. (2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same Sex relationships and implications for Criminal Justice and Mental Health Responses. Violence and Victims, 18(6), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.6.659CrossRefPubMed

Reidy, D. E., Kearns, M. C., DeGue, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Massetti, G., & Kiehl, K. A. (2015). Why psychopathy matters: Implications for public health and violence prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reuter, T. R., Newcomb, M. E., Whitton, S. W., & Mustanski, B. (2017). Intimate partner violence victimization in LGBT young adults: Demographic differences and associations with health behaviors. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000031CrossRefPubMed

Robertson, E. L., Walker, T. M., & Frick, P. J. (2020). Intimate partner violence perpetration and psychopathy: A comprehensive review. European Psychologist, 25(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000397CrossRef

Rock, R. C., Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Salekin, R. T. (2013). Concurrent and predictive validity of psychopathy in a batterers’ intervention sample. Law and Human Behavior, 37(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000006CrossRefPubMed

Rollè, L., Giardina, G., Caldarera, A. M., Gerino, E., & Brustia, P. (2018). When intimate partner violence meets same sex couples: A review of same sex intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ruffles, J. (2004). Diagnosing evil in Australian courts: Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder as legal synonyms of evil. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 11(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2004.11.1.113CrossRef

Russell, B., Chapleau, K. M., & Kraus, S. W. (2015). When is it abuse? How assailant gender, sexual orientation, and protection orders influence perceptions of intimate partner abuse. Partner Abuse, 6(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.1.47CrossRef

Seelau, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20(6), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4CrossRef

Stanziani, M., Cox, J., & Coffey, C. A. (2018). Adding insult to injury: Sex, sexual orientation, and juror decision-making in a case of intimate partner violence. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(10), 1325–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1374066CrossRefPubMed

Sylaska, K. M., & Walters, A. S. (2014). Testing the extent of the gender trap: College students’ perceptions of and reactions to intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 70, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1CrossRef

Taylor, J. C., Bates, E. A., Colosi, A., & Creer, A. J. (2022). Barriers to men’s help seeking for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), 18417–18444. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211035870CrossRef

Venables, N. C., Hall, J. R., & Patrick, C. J. (2014). Differentiating psychopathy from antisocial personality disorder: A triarchic model perspective. Psychological Medicine, 44(5), 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171300161XCrossRefPubMed

Vitello, C. J. (2004). The myth of a psychiatric crime wave: An analysis of public perception regarding mental illness and the effect on juror sentencing recommendations (Publication No. 3134220) [Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Wasarhaley, N. E., Lynch, K. R., Golding, J. M., & Renzetti, C. M. (2017). The impact of gender stereotypes on legal perceptions of lesbian intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(5), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586370CrossRefPubMed

Weare, S. (2018). Oh you’re a guy, how could you be raped by a woman, that makes no sense’: Towards a case for legally recognising and labelling ‘forced-to-penetrate’cases as rape. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552317000179CrossRef

Weare, S., Hulley, J., & Craig, D. (2024). Nobody believes you if you’re a bloke’: Barriers to disclosure and help-seeking for male forced-to-penetrate victims/survivors. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580241238768CrossRef

Wiener, R. L., Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2011). Mock jury research: Where do we go from here? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.989CrossRef

Willis, G. M. (2018). Why call someone by what we don’t want them to be? The ethics of labeling in forensic/correctional psychology. Psychology Crime & Law, 24(7), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640CrossRef

Willmott, D., & Widanaralalage, B. K. (2024). Male rape myths: Examining the role of victim empathy and socio-demographics in a cross-sectional sample of UK adults. International Journal of law Crime and Justice, 76, 100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100645CrossRef

Willmott, D., Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., & Hudspith, L. (2021). Jury decision-making in rape trials: An attitude problem? In D.A. Crighton & G.J. Towl (Eds.), Forensic psychology (pp. 94–119). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260669.ch5

Willmott, D., Rafique, A., Widanaralalage, B. K., & Agneswaran, A. (2024). Investigating the role of psychopathic personality traits, gender and ethnicity in rape myth acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2314000

World Health Organization (2010). Preventing intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: Taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/9789241564007_eng.pdf?ua = 1

Worthington, R. L., Dillon, F. R., & Becker-Schutte, A. M. (2005). Development, reliability, and validity of the lesbian, gay, and bisexual knowledge and attitudes scale for heterosexuals (LGB-KASH). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.104

Yoon, D., Eher, R., & Mokros, A. (2022). Incremental validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised above and beyond the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder regarding recidivism in sexual offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 80, 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101780CrossRef

Title: The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence
Authors: Julia Belton
Meredith J. Awrey
Gabriela D. B. Sheinin
Calvin M. Langton
Publication date: 28-09-2024
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Family Violence
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00752-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Springer Medicine

The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content