Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Spinal navigation with AI-driven 3D-reconstruction of fluoroscopy images: an ex-vivo feasibility study

Authors: Dietmar Luchmann, Sascha Jecklin, Nicola A. Cavalcanti, Christoph J. Laux, Aidana Massalimova, Hooman Esfandiari, Mazda Farshad, Philipp Fürnstahl

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the increasing number of surgeries utilizing spinal instrumentation, three-dimensional surgical navigation aims to improve the accuracy of implant placement. However, its widespread clinical adaption has been hindered by factors such as high radiation exposure and interference with standard surgical workflows.

Methods

X23D is a novel AI-based fluoroscopy reconstruction technique that generates a 3D anatomical model of the spine from only four fluoroscopy images. Based on this technology, we developed a prototype for the surgical navigation of pedicle screws placement of the lumbar spine, visualizing the 3D-reconstructed spine anatomy and the surgical drill position in real-time. An ex-vivo study was conducted to compare the accuracy of the X23D-based navigation approach with fluoroscopy-aided freehand instrumentation. Five board-certified surgeons placed pedicle screws on six human torsi within a realistic surgical environment. Breach rate, site and extent (Gertzbein-Robbins) were evaluated in postoperative CT scans, as well as execution time, radiation dose, and user experience. Specimens, operating side, and surgeon were randomised.

Results

Forty-nine pedicle screws (n = 24 × 23D, n = 25 2D-fluoroscopy) were evaluated, with six breaches occurring in the control group, one of which was considered clinically significant (medial breach grade C). Five breaches with one clinically significant breach were observed in the X23D group. Breach rate, execution time for each lumbar level (X23D 167 s vs. control 156 s), radiation dose (X23D 33.26 mGy vs. control 49.5 mGy), and user experience did not reveal significant differences (p > 0.05) between the groups.

Conclusions

Spinal navigation using the X23D-based approach shows promise and performs well in a realistic surgical ex-vivo setting. With further refinements, its accuracy is expected to match clinical-grade navigation systems while reducing radiation dose.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LEA, et al. Spinal Fusion in the United States. Spine. 2012;37(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LEA, et al. Spinal Fusion in the United States. Spine. 2012;37(1):67–76.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N et al. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States 2004 to 2015. Spine 2019;44(5):369–376. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N et al. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States 2004 to 2015. Spine 2019;44(5):369–376.
4.
go back to reference Bridwell KH. Bridwell and DeWald’s Textbook of spinal surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. Bridwell KH. Bridwell and DeWald’s Textbook of spinal surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019.
5.
go back to reference Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011;21(2):247–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011;21(2):247–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Perfetti DC, Kisinde S, Rogers-LaVanne MP, et al. Robotic spine surgery: past, present, and future. Spine. 2022;47(13):909–21.CrossRefPubMed Perfetti DC, Kisinde S, Rogers-LaVanne MP, et al. Robotic spine surgery: past, present, and future. Spine. 2022;47(13):909–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wallace N, Schaffer NE, Aleem IS, et al. 3D-printed patient-specific spine implants: a systematic review. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(10):400–7.CrossRefPubMed Wallace N, Schaffer NE, Aleem IS, et al. 3D-printed patient-specific spine implants: a systematic review. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(10):400–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):196–203.CrossRefPubMed Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):196–203.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R, et al. Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(5):990–1004.CrossRefPubMed Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R, et al. Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(5):990–1004.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Härtl R, Lam KS, Wang J, et al. Worldwide Survey on the Use of Navigation in spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(1):162–72.CrossRefPubMed Härtl R, Lam KS, Wang J, et al. Worldwide Survey on the Use of Navigation in spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(1):162–72.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Otomo N, Funao H, Yamanouchi K, et al. Computed tomography-based Navigation System in current spine surgery: a narrative review. Medicina. 2022;58(2):241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Otomo N, Funao H, Yamanouchi K, et al. Computed tomography-based Navigation System in current spine surgery: a narrative review. Medicina. 2022;58(2):241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Kasten Y, Doktofsky D, Kovler I. End-To-End convolutional neural network for 3D Reconstruction of knee bones from Bi-planar X-Ray images. In: Deeba F, Johnson P, Würfl T, et al. editors. Machine learning for Medical Image Reconstruction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. pp. 122–33. Kasten Y, Doktofsky D, Kovler I. End-To-End convolutional neural network for 3D Reconstruction of knee bones from Bi-planar X-Ray images. In: Deeba F, Johnson P, Würfl T, et al. editors. Machine learning for Medical Image Reconstruction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. pp. 122–33.
13.
go back to reference Tsai T, Lu T, Chen CM, et al. A volumetric model-based 2D to 3D registration method for measuring kinematics of natural knees with single‐plane fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 2010;37(3):1273–84.CrossRefPubMed Tsai T, Lu T, Chen CM, et al. A volumetric model-based 2D to 3D registration method for measuring kinematics of natural knees with single‐plane fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 2010;37(3):1273–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zheng G, Nolte L, Ferguson SJ. Scaled, patient-specific 3D vertebral model reconstruction based on 2D lateral fluoroscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;6(3):351–66.CrossRefPubMed Zheng G, Nolte L, Ferguson SJ. Scaled, patient-specific 3D vertebral model reconstruction based on 2D lateral fluoroscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;6(3):351–66.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ün MK, Avşar E, Akçalı İD. An analytical method to create patient-specific deformed bone models using X-ray images and a healthy bone model. Comput Biol Med. 2019;104:43–51.CrossRefPubMed Ün MK, Avşar E, Akçalı İD. An analytical method to create patient-specific deformed bone models using X-ray images and a healthy bone model. Comput Biol Med. 2019;104:43–51.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Youn K, Park MS, Lee J. Iterative approach for 3D reconstruction of the femur from un-calibrated 2D radiographic images. Med Eng Phys. 2017;50:89–95.CrossRefPubMed Youn K, Park MS, Lee J. Iterative approach for 3D reconstruction of the femur from un-calibrated 2D radiographic images. Med Eng Phys. 2017;50:89–95.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jecklin S, Jancik C, Farshad M, et al. X23D - intraoperative 3D lumbar spine shape reconstruction based on sparse Multi-view X-Ray data. J Imaging. 2022;8(10):271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jecklin S, Jancik C, Farshad M, et al. X23D - intraoperative 3D lumbar spine shape reconstruction based on sparse Multi-view X-Ray data. J Imaging. 2022;8(10):271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Jang S, Graffy PM, Ziemlewicz TJ, et al. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal and thoracic CT: normative L1 trabecular attenuation values in more than 20000 adults. Radiol. 2019;291(2):360–7.CrossRef Jang S, Graffy PM, Ziemlewicz TJ, et al. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal and thoracic CT: normative L1 trabecular attenuation values in more than 20000 adults. Radiol. 2019;291(2):360–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Massalimova A, Timmermans M, Cavalcanti N, et al. Automatic breach detection during spine pedicle drilling based on vibroacoustic sensing. Artif Intell Med. 2023;144:102641.CrossRefPubMed Massalimova A, Timmermans M, Cavalcanti N, et al. Automatic breach detection during spine pedicle drilling based on vibroacoustic sensing. Artif Intell Med. 2023;144:102641.CrossRefPubMed
21.
26.
go back to reference Caelers I, Berendsen RCM, Droeghaag R, et al. Comparing radiation dose of image-guided techniques in lumbar fusion surgery with pedicle screw insertion; a systematic review. Spine J. 2023;13:100199. Caelers I, Berendsen RCM, Droeghaag R, et al. Comparing radiation dose of image-guided techniques in lumbar fusion surgery with pedicle screw insertion; a systematic review. Spine J. 2023;13:100199.
27.
go back to reference Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, et al. Navigation and Robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now? Neurosurg. 2017;80(3S):86–99.CrossRef Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, et al. Navigation and Robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now? Neurosurg. 2017;80(3S):86–99.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Spinal navigation with AI-driven 3D-reconstruction of fluoroscopy images: an ex-vivo feasibility study
Authors
Dietmar Luchmann
Sascha Jecklin
Nicola A. Cavalcanti
Christoph J. Laux
Aidana Massalimova
Hooman Esfandiari
Mazda Farshad
Philipp Fürnstahl
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08052-2