Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on modern management of frailty

LIVE: Thursday 17th October 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Frailty has a significant impact on health and wellbeing, especially in older adults. Join our experts to understand the factors that contribute to the development of frailty and find out how to manage the condition and reduce the risk of disability, dependency, and mortality.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

06-09-2024 | Skin Cancer | Head and Neck

The utility and reliability of a deep learning algorithm as a diagnosis support tool in head & neck non-melanoma skin malignancies

Authors: Alfonso Medela, Alberto Sabater, Ignacio Hernández Montilla, Taig MacCarthy, Andy Aguilar, Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers, encompassing basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), is on the rise globally and new methods to improve skin malignancy diagnosis are necessary. This study aims to assess the performance of a CE-certified medical device as a diagnosis support tool in a head & neck (H&N) outpatient clinic, specifically focusing on the classification of three key diagnostics: BCC, cSCC, and non-malignant lesions (such as Actinic Cheilitis, Actinic Keratosis, and Seborrheic Keratosis).

Methods

a prospective, longitudinal, non-randomized study was designed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based method as a diagnosis tool in a group of patients referred to the head & neck clinic for suspicious skin lesions.

Results

135 patients were included, 92 (68.1%) were male and 43 (31.9%) were female. The median age was 71 years +/- 9 (Min: 56/Max: 91). Of those, 108 were malignant pathologies (54 basal cell carcinoma and 54 squamous cell carcinoma) and 27 benign pathologies (14 seborrheic keratoses, 2 actinic keratoses, and 11 actinic cheilitis). Of special significance is the remarkable performance of the medical device in identifying malignant lesions (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) within the top-5 most likely diagnoses in above 90% of cases, underscoring its potential utility for early diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusion

In this study, the effectiveness of deep learning methods, with a particular focus on vision transformers, as a diagnostic aid for H&N cutaneous non-melanoma skin cancers was demonstrated, highlighting its potential value for early detection and treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers. In this vein, further research is needed in the future to elucidate the role of this technology, because of its potential in the primary care clinic, dermatology, and head & neck surgery clinic as well as in patients with suspicious lesions, as a self-exploration tool.
Literature
1.
Karia PS, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Harrington DP, Murphy GF, Qureshi AA, Schmults CD (2014) Evaluation of American Joint Committee on Cancer, International Union Against Cancer, and Brigham and women’s Hospital tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 32(4):327CrossRefPubMed
2.
Apalla Z, Nashan D, Weller RB, Castellsagué X (2017) Skin cancer: epidemiology, disease burden, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Dermatology Therapy 7:5–19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr (1992) Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of thse skin, ear, and lip: implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26(6):976–990CrossRefPubMed
4.
Burton KA, Ashack KA, Khachemoune A (2016) Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a review of high-risk and metastatic disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 17:491–450CrossRefPubMed
5.
Gray DT, Suman VJ, Su WD, Clay RP, Harmsen WS, Roenigk RK (1997) Trends in the population-based incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin first diagnosed between 1984 and 1992. Arch Dermatol 133(6):735–740CrossRefPubMed
6.
Miller DL, Weinstock MA (1994) Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol 30(5):774–778CrossRefPubMed
7.
Motaparthi K, Kapil JP, Velazquez EF (2017) Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: review of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging guidelines, prognostic factors, and histopathologic variants. Adv Anat Pathol 24(4):171–194CrossRefPubMed
8.
Neelapu R, Devi GL, Rao KS (2018) Deep learning based conventional neural network architecture for medical image classification. Traitement Du Signal 35(2):169CrossRef
9.
Rosado B, Menzies S, Harbauer A, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M, Kittler H (2003) Accuracy of computer diagnosis of melanoma: a quantitative meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 139(3):361–367CrossRefPubMed
10.
Burroni M, Corona R, Dell’Eva G, Sera F, Bono R, Puddu P, Rubegni P (2004) Melanoma computer-aided diagnosis: reliability and feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 10(6):1881–1886CrossRefPubMed
11.
Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M J. T. I. O. (2002). Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol, 3(3), 159–165
12.
Codella N, Cai J, Abedini M, Garnavi R, Halpern A, Smith JR (2015), October Deep learning, sparse coding, and SVM for melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images. In International workshop on machine learning in medical imaging (pp. 118–126). Cham: Springer International Publishing
13.
Gutman D, Codella NC, Celebi E, Helba B, Marchetti M, Mishra N, Halpern A (2016) Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC). arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01397
14.
Binder M, Kittler H, Seeber A, Steiner A, Pehamberger H, Wolff K (1998) Epiluminescence microscopy-based classification of pigmented skin lesions using computerized image analysis and an artificial neural network. Melanoma Res 8(3):261–266CrossRefPubMed
15.
Hoffmann K (1997) In: Altmeyer P, Stücker M (eds) Skin cancer and UV radiation. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–226
16.
WH JR CLARK (1989) Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1983–1904
17.
Schindewolf T, Stolz W, Albert R, Abmayr W, Harms H (1993) Classification of melanocytic lesions with color and texture analysis using digital image processing. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 15(1):1–11PubMed
18.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, Toberer F, Buhl T, Blum A, Zalaudek I (2018) Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol 29(8):1836–1842CrossRefPubMed
20.
Marchetti MA, Codella NC, Dusza SW, Gutman DA, Helba B, Kalloo A, International Skin Imaging Collaboration (2018) …. Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 78(2), 270–277
21.
Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, Berking C, Haferkamp S, Hauschild A, Utikal JS (2019) Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification. Eur J Cancer 119:11–17CrossRefPubMed
22.
Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Houlsby N (2020) An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929
23.
Lomas ALBJ, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath‐Hextall FJBJ (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166(5):1069–1080CrossRefPubMed
24.
Samarasinghe V, Madan V (2012) Nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg 5(1):3–10CrossRef
25.
Loftus TJ, Shickel B, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Ren Y, Glicksberg BS, Cao J, Bihorac A (2022) Artificial intelligence-enabled decision support in nephrology. Nat Rev Nephrol 18(7):452–465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, Valentim CC, Baxter SL, Liu G, Xia H (2019) Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25(3):433–438CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tran KA, Kondrashova O, Bradley A, Williams ED, Pearson JV, Waddell N (2021) Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. Genome Med 13:1–17CrossRef
28.
Hincapié MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A, Piñeros JA, Nasner D, Escobar MF (2020) Implementation and usefulness of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Prim care Community Health 11:2150132720980612CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep Learn Nat 521(7553):436–444
30.
Asbeck SM, Imo BU, Okobi OE, Dorcé-Medard J (2023) The dermatologic care needs of a Rural Community in South Florida. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(4):3071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Liu Y, Jain A, Eng C, Way DH, Lee K, Bui P, Coz D (2020) A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases. Nat Med 26(6):900–908CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ameri A (2020) A deep learning approach to skin cancer detection in dermoscopy images. J Biomedical Phys Eng 10(6):801CrossRef
33.
SM J, Aravindan PM, C., Appavu R (2023) Classification of skin cancer from dermoscopic images using deep neural network architectures. Multimedia Tools Appl 82(10):15763–15778CrossRef
34.
Serrano C, Lazo M, Serrano A, Toledo-Pastrana T, Barros-Tornay R, Acha B (2022) Clinically inspired skin lesion classification through the detection of dermoscopic criteria for basal cell carcinoma. J Imaging 8(7):197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Sharma AN, Shwe S, Mesinkovska NA (2022) Current state of machine learning for non-melanoma skin cancer. Arch Dermatol Res 314(4):325–327CrossRefPubMed
36.
Du-Harpur X, Arthurs C, Ganier C, Woolf R, Laftah Z, Lakhan M, Lynch MD (2021) Clinically relevant vulnerabilities of deep machine learning systems for skin cancer diagnosis. J Invest Dermatol 141(4):916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Winkler JK, Fink C, Toberer F, Enk A, Deinlein T, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Haenssle HA (2019) Association between surgical skin markings in dermoscopic images and diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for melanoma recognition. JAMA Dermatology 155(10):1135–1141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Montilla IH, Carthy M, Aguilar T, A., Medela A (2023) Dermatology Image Quality Assessment (DIQA): Artificial intelligence to ensure the clinical utility of images for remote consultations and clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 88(4):927–928CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The utility and reliability of a deep learning algorithm as a diagnosis support tool in head & neck non-melanoma skin malignancies
Authors
Alfonso Medela
Alberto Sabater
Ignacio Hernández Montilla
Taig MacCarthy
Andy Aguilar
Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba
Publication date
06-09-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08951-z