Objectives
This study aimed to assess the performance of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, on Japanese Nuclear Medicine Board Examination (JNMBE) questions and to evaluate the influence of visual information on the decision-making process.
Methods
This study utilized 92 questions with images from the JNMBE (2019–2023). The LLMs’ responses were assessed under two conditions: providing both text and images and providing only text. Each model answered all questions thrice, and the most frequent answer choice was considered the final answer. The accuracy and agreement rates among the model answers were evaluated using statistical tests.
Results
GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro exhibited no significant differences in terms of accuracy between the text-and-image and text-only conditions. GPT-4o and Claude 3 Opus demonstrated accuracies of 54.3% (95% CI: 44.2%–64.1%) each when provided with both text and images; however, they selected the same options as in the text-only condition for 71.7% of the questions. Gemini 1.5 Pro performed significantly worse than GPT-4o under text and image conditions. The agreement rates among the model answers ranged from weak to moderate.
Conclusion
The influence of images on decision-making in nuclear medicine is limited to the latest multimodal LLMs, and their diagnostic ability in this highly specialized field remains insufficient. Improving the utilization of image information and enhancing the answer reproducibility are crucial for the effective application of LLMs in nuclear medicine education and practice. Further advancements in these areas are necessary to harness the potential of LLMs as assistants in nuclear medicine diagnosis.
