Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

26-12-2023 | Rhinoplasty | Original Articles

Limited Incision Rhinoplasty: An Approach for All Primary and Revision Cases

Authors: Viswanath Swamy, Alannah L. Phelan, Amani Abdelrahman, Mark G. Albert

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Rhinoplasty was one of the most frequently performed aesthetic surgeries in the USA in 2022. Traditionally, the open approach has been preferred by the majority of surgeons often due to familiarity and ease of visualization. However, patient interest in closed and preservation rhinoplasty is driving a resurgence in the popularity of endonasal techniques. We present a series of 100 consecutive endonasal primary and revision rhinoplasty cases using bilateral isolated modified rim incisions.

Methods

One-hundred consecutive patients underwent closed rhinoplasty via isolated modified rim incisions at a single-surgeon private practice. The senior author performs 100% endonasal rhinoplasty. A retrospective chart review was performed from 06/25/20 to 09/21/22. Information on demographics, complications, and need for revision was collected.

Results

Eighty-four patients underwent primary rhinoplasty, 11 underwent secondary rhinoplasty, 4 underwent tertiary rhinoplasty, and 1 underwent quaternary rhinoplasty. Isolated modified rim incisions were used in all cases except in cases of septoplasty when a unilateral Killian incision was added, or in cases of lateral osteotomy when vestibular stab incisions were added. Post-operatively, six (6.0%) patients required revision, all of which were performed under local anesthesia.

Conclusion

Limited incision rhinoplasty is a reliable surgical approach that produces predictable results with a low revision rate. This technique is highly effective in minimizing soft tissue disruption to ensure safe, reliable, and effective outcomes in primary and revision rhinoplasty. It is an easier technique to learn compared to traditional endonasal and even arguably open rhinoplasty, thus lending itself to widespread adoption especially among novice rhinoplasty surgeons.
Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(2):230–239CrossRefPubMed Sheen JH (1984) Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(2):230–239CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Constantian MB (2005) The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: variations on a theme—A study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(1):268–281CrossRefPubMed Constantian MB (2005) The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: variations on a theme—A study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(1):268–281CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cheney ML, Hadlock TA, Saleh H, Khoury E (2015) Closed rhinoplasty. Facial surgery: plastic and reconstructive. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 337–363 Cheney ML, Hadlock TA, Saleh H, Khoury E (2015) Closed rhinoplasty. Facial surgery: plastic and reconstructive. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 337–363
13.
go back to reference Sharif-Askary B, Carlson AR, Van Noord MG, Marcus JR (2020) Incidence of postoperative adverse events after rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):669–684CrossRefPubMed Sharif-Askary B, Carlson AR, Van Noord MG, Marcus JR (2020) Incidence of postoperative adverse events after rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):669–684CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Constantian MB (2002) differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(6):2097–2111CrossRefPubMed Constantian MB (2002) differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(6):2097–2111CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Limited Incision Rhinoplasty: An Approach for All Primary and Revision Cases
Authors
Viswanath Swamy
Alannah L. Phelan
Amani Abdelrahman
Mark G. Albert
Publication date
26-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03778-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2024 Go to the issue