Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Case Report

Replacement of a single-tooth implant restoration with the abutment dual-scanning technique: a case report

Authors: Fatmanur Demir Boz, Kıvanç Akça

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Digital technologies have not only revolutionized workflow strategies for implant- supported fixed prostheses but also changed preferences in the choice of restoration retention. Owing to the effortlessness of developing workflows with digitalization, screw-retention has become favored for initial prostheses. However, cement retention is still indicated for cases in which abutment reuse is needed for replacing failing restorations with technical complications.

Case presentation

In this case report, a modified digital workflow is described for treating an impaired occlusal relationship. A dual-scan approach for an abutment-level digital implant impression to remake a cement retained implant supported fixed restoration is defined in detail.

Conclusion

Clinicians can highly benefit from the presented strategy, which offers an efficient digital workflow to simplify cement-retained abutment level impressions through the use of an intraoral scanner. Exchanging intra- and extra-orally surface scanned abutment data may become an option in complete digital model-free workflows for addressing problems related to cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salvi GE, Bragger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:69–85.PubMed Salvi GE, Bragger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:69–85.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:720–6.CrossRefPubMed Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:720–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bragger U. Literature review: hardware complications and failures. In: Wismeijer D, Buser D, Chen S, editors. ITI treatment guide volume 8 Biological and hardware complications in implant dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2015. pp. 12–6. Bragger U. Literature review: hardware complications and failures. In: Wismeijer D, Buser D, Chen S, editors. ITI treatment guide volume 8 Biological and hardware complications in implant dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2015. pp. 12–6.
4.
go back to reference Lai HC. Prevention and management of hardware and biological complications in implant dentistry. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;55:814–8.PubMed Lai HC. Prevention and management of hardware and biological complications in implant dentistry. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;55:814–8.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cho W-T, Bae E-B, Ahn J-J, Huh J-B. Cordless digital workflow for scanning implant-supported prostheses at the abutment level: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:428–30.CrossRefPubMed Cho W-T, Bae E-B, Ahn J-J, Huh J-B. Cordless digital workflow for scanning implant-supported prostheses at the abutment level: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:428–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bennani V, Schwass D, Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1354–63.CrossRefPubMed Bennani V, Schwass D, Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1354–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Ming X, Luo Y, Zhang W. Effect of substrate material and abutment geometry on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132:188.e1-188.e8.CrossRef Zhang Z, Ming X, Luo Y, Zhang W. Effect of substrate material and abutment geometry on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132:188.e1-188.e8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zeller S, Guichet D, Kontogiorgos E, Nagy WW. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:276–84.CrossRefPubMed Zeller S, Guichet D, Kontogiorgos E, Nagy WW. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:276–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baek Y-W, Lim Y-J, Kim M-J, Kwon H-B. Effect of custom abutment data superimposition on the accuracy of implant abutment level scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;10:S0022–39132200176. Baek Y-W, Lim Y-J, Kim M-J, Kwon H-B. Effect of custom abutment data superimposition on the accuracy of implant abutment level scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;10:S0022–39132200176.
10.
go back to reference Kim J-W, Cho W-T, Bae E-B, Huh J-B. Evaluation of clinical accuracy of implant abutment level impression technique using digital superimposition of customized abutment. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:752–5.CrossRefPubMed Kim J-W, Cho W-T, Bae E-B, Huh J-B. Evaluation of clinical accuracy of implant abutment level impression technique using digital superimposition of customized abutment. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:752–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Singh M, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91:242–8.CrossRefPubMed Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Singh M, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91:242–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Karasan D, Sailer I, Lee H, Demir F, Zarauz C, Akca K. Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: a crossover clinical trial. J Dent. 2023;128:104365.CrossRefPubMed Karasan D, Sailer I, Lee H, Demir F, Zarauz C, Akca K. Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: a crossover clinical trial. J Dent. 2023;128:104365.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim J-E, Hong Y-S, Kang Y-J, Kim J-H, Ahim J-S. Accuracy of scanned stock abutments using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:797–803.CrossRefPubMed Kim J-E, Hong Y-S, Kang Y-J, Kim J-H, Ahim J-S. Accuracy of scanned stock abutments using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:797–803.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Park T-M, Jung C-M, Yoon M-J, Huh J-B, Lee S-H, Sailer I, Lee H. Accuracy of customized abutment data superimposition according to the extent of scanning area. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:390–4.CrossRefPubMed Park T-M, Jung C-M, Yoon M-J, Huh J-B, Lee S-H, Sailer I, Lee H. Accuracy of customized abutment data superimposition according to the extent of scanning area. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:390–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84.CrossRefPubMed Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:71–6.CrossRefPubMed Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:71–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Replacement of a single-tooth implant restoration with the abutment dual-scanning technique: a case report
Authors
Fatmanur Demir Boz
Kıvanç Akça
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05271-w