Skip to main content
Top

05-03-2025 | Rectopexy | Original Article

Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy

Authors: Henry H. Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with defecation. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy has been shown to effectively improve obstructed defecation symptoms caused by rectal partial prolapse and lack of support during first year postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and anatomical outcomes of this novel and minimally invasive surgery.

Materials and Methods

This longitudinal prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, university-affiliated pelvic health clinic. Women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for treatment of ODS and for whom time since their surgery was at least 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients were contacted via telephone and were offered to come for an in-person evaluation, including symptom assessment (ODS symptoms, PFDI-20 and PGI-I questionnaires), POP-Q evaluation, and 3D dynamic ultrasound for assessment of rectal hypermobility. Clinical success was defined as not having any ODS symptoms (straining, incomplete emptying, or need to splint) in over 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical success was defined as not having rectal prolapse and compression ratio on ultrasound assessment of less than 50%.

Results

A total of 135 patients were eligible for inclusion, out of which 65 patients, averaging 63.3 ± 13.3 years in age and 27.1 ± 5.6 in body mass index (BMI), were recruited. Median follow-up time was 29 months. Subjective failure was noted in 18 patients (28.1%) who experienced symptoms in more than 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical failure, defined as having a compression ratio of more than 50% or rectal prolapse, was noted in seven patients (12.7%). Three patients failed treatment with a recurrence of rectal prolapse and two patients underwent ventral mesh rectopexy within 1 year after surgery. Ultrasound measurements revealed that compression ratio significantly reduced from 52.9% ± 24.7 to 17.7% ± 12.3 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial anatomical improvements during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study indicates that transvaginal sacrospinous ligament rectopexy is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive effective alternative for treating ODS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Guzman Rojas R, KamisanAtan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):939–44.CrossRefPubMed Guzman Rojas R, KamisanAtan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):939–44.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Color Dis. 2003;5(4):280–7.CrossRef D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Color Dis. 2003;5(4):280–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grimes CL, Schimpf MO, Wieslander CK, Sleemi A, Doyle P, Wu Y, et al. Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1433–54.CrossRefPubMed Grimes CL, Schimpf MO, Wieslander CK, Sleemi A, Doyle P, Wu Y, et al. Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1433–54.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. The assessment and management of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocoele, and enterocoele in adults. BMJ. 2011;342:c7099.CrossRefPubMed Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. The assessment and management of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocoele, and enterocoele in adults. BMJ. 2011;342:c7099.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2005;140(1):63–73.CrossRefPubMed Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2005;140(1):63–73.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grimes CL, Overholser RH, Xu R, Tan-Kim J, Nager CW, Dyer KY, et al. Measuring the impact of a posterior compartment procedure on symptoms of obstructed defecation and posterior vaginal compartment anatomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1817–23.CrossRefPubMed Grimes CL, Overholser RH, Xu R, Tan-Kim J, Nager CW, Dyer KY, et al. Measuring the impact of a posterior compartment procedure on symptoms of obstructed defecation and posterior vaginal compartment anatomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1817–23.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ridgeway BM, Weinstein MM, Tunitsky-Bitton E. American urogynecologic society best-practice statement on evaluation of obstructed defecation. Urogynecology. 2018;24(6):383–91. Ridgeway BM, Weinstein MM, Tunitsky-Bitton E. American urogynecologic society best-practice statement on evaluation of obstructed defecation. Urogynecology. 2018;24(6):383–91.
10.
go back to reference Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):337–49.CrossRefPubMed Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):337–49.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy for obstructed defecation symptoms: 1-year outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(11):3045–52.CrossRefPubMed Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy for obstructed defecation symptoms: 1-year outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(11):3045–52.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Routzong MR, Abramowitch SD, Chang C, Goldberg RP, Rostaminia G. Obstructed defecation symptom severity and degree of rectal hypermobility and folding detected by dynamic ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2021;37(3):229–36.CrossRefPubMed Routzong MR, Abramowitch SD, Chang C, Goldberg RP, Rostaminia G. Obstructed defecation symptom severity and degree of rectal hypermobility and folding detected by dynamic ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2021;37(3):229–36.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Alshiek J, Murad-Regadas SM, Mellgren A, Glanc P, Khatri G, Quiroz LH, et al. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(2):200–16.CrossRefPubMed Alshiek J, Murad-Regadas SM, Mellgren A, Glanc P, Khatri G, Quiroz LH, et al. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(2):200–16.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Moore D, Young CJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defaecation in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(9):909–18.CrossRefPubMed Moore D, Young CJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defaecation in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(9):909–18.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Skardoon G, Khera A, Emmanuel A, Burgell R. dyssynergic defaecation and biofeedback therapy in the pathophysiology and management of functional constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(4):410–23.CrossRefPubMed Skardoon G, Khera A, Emmanuel A, Burgell R. dyssynergic defaecation and biofeedback therapy in the pathophysiology and management of functional constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(4):410–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Bezerra CCR, de Oliveira MTCC, Regadas Filho FSP, Rodrigues LV, et al. Use of biofeedback combined with diet for treatment of obstructed defecation associated with paradoxical puborectalis contraction (Anismus): predictive factors and short-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Bezerra CCR, de Oliveira MTCC, Regadas Filho FSP, Rodrigues LV, et al. Use of biofeedback combined with diet for treatment of obstructed defecation associated with paradoxical puborectalis contraction (Anismus): predictive factors and short-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Picciariello A, O’Connell PR, Hahnloser D, Gallo G, Munoz-Duyos A, Schwandner O, et al. Obstructed defaecation syndrome: European consensus guidelines on the surgical management. Br J Surg. 2021;108(10):1149–53.CrossRefPubMed Picciariello A, O’Connell PR, Hahnloser D, Gallo G, Munoz-Duyos A, Schwandner O, et al. Obstructed defaecation syndrome: European consensus guidelines on the surgical management. Br J Surg. 2021;108(10):1149–53.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):4977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):4977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Leo CA, Campennì P, Hodgkinson JD, Rossitti P, Digito F, De Carli G, et al. Long-term functional outcome after internal delorme’s procedure for obstructed defecation syndrome, and the role of postoperative rehabilitation. J Invest Surg. 2018;31(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed Leo CA, Campennì P, Hodgkinson JD, Rossitti P, Digito F, De Carli G, et al. Long-term functional outcome after internal delorme’s procedure for obstructed defecation syndrome, and the role of postoperative rehabilitation. J Invest Surg. 2018;31(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Watkins BP, Landercasper J, Belzer GE, Rechner P, Knudson R, Bintz M, Lambert P. Long-term follow-up of the modified delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):498–503.CrossRefPubMed Watkins BP, Landercasper J, Belzer GE, Rechner P, Knudson R, Bintz M, Lambert P. Long-term follow-up of the modified delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):498–503.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bhattacharya P, Hussain MI, Zaman S, Randle S, Tanveer Y, Faiz N, et al. Delorme’s vs. Altemeier’s in the management of rectal procidentia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):454.CrossRef Bhattacharya P, Hussain MI, Zaman S, Randle S, Tanveer Y, Faiz N, et al. Delorme’s vs. Altemeier’s in the management of rectal procidentia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):454.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Watts AMI, Thompson MR. Evaluation of Delorme’s procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2002;87(2):218–22.CrossRef Watts AMI, Thompson MR. Evaluation of Delorme’s procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2002;87(2):218–22.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fazeli MS, Kazemeini AR, Keshvari A, Keramati MR. Delorme’s procedure: an effective treatment for a full-thickness rectal prolapse in young patients. Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fazeli MS, Kazemeini AR, Keshvari A, Keramati MR. Delorme’s procedure: an effective treatment for a full-thickness rectal prolapse in young patients. Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. The role of conventional pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries in obstructed defecation symptoms change: care and optimal trials sub-analysis of 2-year follow-up data. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(7):1325–34.CrossRefPubMed Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. The role of conventional pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries in obstructed defecation symptoms change: care and optimal trials sub-analysis of 2-year follow-up data. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(7):1325–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):337–49.CrossRefPubMed Rostaminia G, Abramowitch S, Chang C, Goldberg RP. Descent and hypermobility of the rectum in women with obstructed defecation symptoms. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(2):337–49.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Van der Schans E, Boom M, El Moumni M, Verheijen P, Broeders I, Consten E. Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2022;26:1–14. Van der Schans E, Boom M, El Moumni M, Verheijen P, Broeders I, Consten E. Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2022;26:1–14.
28.
go back to reference Foppa C, Martinek L, Arnaud J, Bergamaschi R. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Color Dis. 2014;16(10):809–14.CrossRef Foppa C, Martinek L, Arnaud J, Bergamaschi R. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Color Dis. 2014;16(10):809–14.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lobb H, Kearsey C, Ahmed S, Rajaganeshan R. Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021;5(1):zraa037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lobb H, Kearsey C, Ahmed S, Rajaganeshan R. Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021;5(1):zraa037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Gupta P. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse stage III and stage IV uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40(1):58–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Gupta P. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse stage III and stage IV uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40(1):58–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy
Authors
Henry H. Chill
Alireza Hadizadeh
Angela Leffelman
Claudia Paya Ten
Cecilia Chang
Roger P. Goldberg
Ghazaleh Rostaminia
Publication date
05-03-2025
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06099-w

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.   

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now
Video