Skip to main content
Top

14-07-2024 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

The Norwegian Watch and Wait study: Norwait for rectal cancer. A report from a failed study—a word of caution

Authors: Hans H. Wasmuth, Arne E. Færden

Published in: Updates in Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

The paucity of prospective data on the subject of Watch and Wait for rectal cancer prompted the implementation of Norwait, a population-based study including rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of clinical complete response (cCR) and quantify the regrowth rates. Norwait was a prospective population-based observational study with ethical approval (2017/935) registered at clinicaltrials.com (NTC03402477). Residents of Norway with histologically proven rectal cancer located within 15 cm from anal verge were eligible following completion of radiotherapy or chemoradiation at seven hospitals. cCR was the disappearance of tumour and of any ulcer with/without the appearance of whitening of prior tumour site and telangiectasia evaluated at 12 weeks by digital rectal exam, and endoscopic imaging. The study aimed to include 100 cCR patients with regrowth rates as primary endpoint. The data are presented in crude form. Eighty-two patients were included in seven hospitals from 2018 to 2020 when the study was terminated. Fifty-one patients were included in six hospitals, whereas protocol violations were identified in one hospital, where thirty-one (rather than protocol-estimated 12) patients were enrolled. Amongst the 31 patients, there were only 2 with documented cCR. Of the latter 29, there were 16 with ulcer or persistent tumour, and 13 without any documentation of cCR. Of these, 23 underwent surgery with a delay up to 50 weeks. At median 54-month follow-up of 31 patients, there were 77% local regrowths (n = 23), 40% metachronous metastases (n = 12) and 23% deaths (n = 7). At median 54-month follow-up of 51 cCR patients, there were 53% local regrowths (n = 27), 14% metachronous metastases (n = 7) and 4% deaths (n = 2). Norwait admonishes a word of caution reaching beyond the inconclusive results of a population-based study jeopardised by serious violation to protocol and legislation for conducting safe research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Påhlman L, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336(14):980–987 Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Påhlman L, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336(14):980–987
2.
go back to reference Habr-Gama, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U Jr, Nadalin W, Gansl R, Sousa AH Jr et al (1998) Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 41(9):1087–1096CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U Jr, Nadalin W, Gansl R, Sousa AH Jr et al (1998) Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 41(9):1087–1096CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Beets G, Carvalho C (2014) Report from a consensus meeting: response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer - predictor of cure and a crucial new choice for the patient: on behalf of the Champalimaud 2014 Faculty for “Rectal cancer: when NOT to operate.” Colorectal Dis 16(5):334–337CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Beets G, Carvalho C (2014) Report from a consensus meeting: response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer - predictor of cure and a crucial new choice for the patient: on behalf of the Champalimaud 2014 Faculty for “Rectal cancer: when NOT to operate.” Colorectal Dis 16(5):334–337CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Hughes R (2012) Critical appraisal of the “wait and see” approach in rectal cancer for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation. Br J Surg 99:897–909CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Hughes R (2012) Critical appraisal of the “wait and see” approach in rectal cancer for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation. Br J Surg 99:897–909CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fernandez LM, Sao Juliao GP, Figueiredo NL et al (2021) Conditional recurrence-free survival of clinical complete responders managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in the International Watch and Wait Database: a retrospective, international, multicentre registry study. Lancet Oncol 22:43–50CrossRefPubMed Fernandez LM, Sao Juliao GP, Figueiredo NL et al (2021) Conditional recurrence-free survival of clinical complete responders managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in the International Watch and Wait Database: a retrospective, international, multicentre registry study. Lancet Oncol 22:43–50CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Duraes LC, Kalady MF, Liska D, Gorgun E, Kessler H, Otero-Pineiro A, Steele SR, Valente MA (2023) Word of caution: rectal cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment—do not wait for surgery. Am J Surg 226(4):548–552CrossRefPubMed Duraes LC, Kalady MF, Liska D, Gorgun E, Kessler H, Otero-Pineiro A, Steele SR, Valente MA (2023) Word of caution: rectal cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment—do not wait for surgery. Am J Surg 226(4):548–552CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP, Proscurshim I, Sabbagh C, Lynn PB, Perez RO et al (2014) Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:822–828CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP, Proscurshim I, Sabbagh C, Lynn PB, Perez RO et al (2014) Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:822–828CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sütcüoğlu O, RustamovaCennet N, Özet A, Özdemir N, Yazıcı O (2023) Interpretation of the OPRA Study: are our criteria reliable enough to recommend watch and wait? J Clin Oncol 41(2):416–417CrossRefPubMed Sütcüoğlu O, RustamovaCennet N, Özet A, Özdemir N, Yazıcı O (2023) Interpretation of the OPRA Study: are our criteria reliable enough to recommend watch and wait? J Clin Oncol 41(2):416–417CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ et al (2022) Organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 40:2546–2556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ et al (2022) Organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 40:2546–2556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Wynn GR, Bhasin N, Macklin CP (2010) George ML Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: opinions of British and Irish specialists. Colorectal Dis 12:327–333CrossRefPubMed Wynn GR, Bhasin N, Macklin CP (2010) George ML Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: opinions of British and Irish specialists. Colorectal Dis 12:327–333CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tranchart H, Lefevre JH, Svrcek M et al (2013) What is the incidence of meta- static lymph node involvement after significant pathologic response of primary tumour following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20:1551–1559CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, Lefevre JH, Svrcek M et al (2013) What is the incidence of meta- static lymph node involvement after significant pathologic response of primary tumour following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20:1551–1559CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Emile SH, Maron DJ, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Zhou P, Wexner SD (2023) Predictors of nodal disease in rectal cancer patients with complete mucosal response to neoadjuvant therapy. World J Surg 47(8):2013–2022CrossRefPubMed Emile SH, Maron DJ, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Zhou P, Wexner SD (2023) Predictors of nodal disease in rectal cancer patients with complete mucosal response to neoadjuvant therapy. World J Surg 47(8):2013–2022CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Norwegian Watch and Wait study: Norwait for rectal cancer. A report from a failed study—a word of caution
Authors
Hans H. Wasmuth
Arne E. Færden
Publication date
14-07-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01941-0
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

  • Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now