Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

14-08-2024 | Rectal Cancer | original article

Pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer based on diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis imaging

Authors: Mi Zhou, Mengyuan Chen, Mingfang Luo, Meining Chen, Hongyun Huang

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To explore diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for assessing pathological prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

A total of 162 patients (105 males; mean age of 61.8 ± 13.1 years old) scheduled to undergo radical surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. The pathological prognostic factors included histological differentiation, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI). The DWI, IVIM, and DKI parameters were obtained and correlated with prognostic factors using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Their assessment value was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that higher mean kurtosis (MK) (odds ratio (OR) = 194.931, p < 0.001) and lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (OR = 0.077, p = 0.025) were independently associated with poorer differentiation tumors. Higher perfusion fraction (f) (OR = 575.707, p = 0.023) and higher MK (OR = 173.559, p < 0.001) were independently associated with LNMs. Higher f (OR = 1036.116, p = 0.024), higher MK (OR = 253.629, p < 0.001), lower mean diffusivity (MD) (OR = 0.125, p = 0.038), and lower ADC (OR = 0.094, p = 0.022) were independently associated with EMVI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of MK for histological differentiation was significantly higher than ADC (0.771 vs. 0.638, p = 0.035). The AUC of MK for LNM positivity was higher than f (0.770 vs. 0.656, p = 0.048). The AUC of MK combined with MD (0.790) was the highest among f (0.663), MK (0.779), MD (0.617), and ADC (0.610) in assessing EMVI.

Conclusion

The DKI parameters may be used as imaging biomarkers to assess pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer before surgery.

Clinical relevance statement

Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters, particularly mean kurtosis (MK), are promising biomarkers for assessing histological differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and extramural vascular invasion of rectal cancer. These findings suggest DKI’s potential in the preoperative assessment of rectal cancer.

Key Points

  • Mean kurtosis outperformed the apparent diffusion coefficient in assessing histological differentiation in resectable rectal cancer.
  • Perfusion fraction and mean kurtosis are independent indicators for assessing lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.
  • Mean kurtosis and mean diffusivity demonstrated superior accuracy in assessing extramural vascular invasion.
Appendix
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Literature
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Metadata
Title
Pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer based on diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis imaging
Authors
Mi Zhou
Mengyuan Chen
Mingfang Luo
Meining Chen
Hongyun Huang
Publication date
14-08-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2025
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11025-7

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Register your interest

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Register your interest