Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Radiotherapy | Research

First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy

Authors: Perry B. Johnson, Julie Bradley, Samsun Lampotang, Amanda Jackson, David Lizdas, William Johnson, Eric Brooks, Raymond B. Mailhot Vega, Nancy Mendenhall

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of mixed-reality (MixR) visualization for patient setup in breast and chest wall radiotherapy (RT) by performing a first-in-human clinical trial comparing MixR with a 3-point alignment.

Methods

IRB approval was granted for a study incorporating MixR during the setup process for patients undergoing proton (n = 10) or photon (n = 8) RT to the breast or chest wall. For each patient, MixR was utilized for five fractions and compared against another five fractions using 3-point alignment. During fractions with MixR, the patient was aligned by at least one therapist wearing a HoloLens 2 device who was able to guide the process by simultaneously and directly viewing the patient and a hologram of the patient’s surface derived from their simulation CT scan. Alignment accuracy was quantified with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for photon treatments and CBCT plus kV/kV imaging for proton treatments. Registration time was tracked throughout the setup process as well as the amount of image guidance (IGRT) utilized for final alignment.

Results

In the proton cohort, the mean 3D shift was 0.96 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.18 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy between the two techniques was less than 0.5 cm. In the photon cohort, the mean 3D shift was 1.18 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.00 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy was less than 0.3 cm. Minor differences were seen in registration time and the amount of IGRT utilization.

Conclusions

MixR for patient setup for breast cancer RT is possible at the level of accuracy and efficiency provided by a 3-point alignment. Further developments in marker tracking, feedback, and a better understanding of the perceptual challenges of MixR are needed to achieve a similar level of accuracy as provided by modern surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, UFHPTI 2015-BR05: Improving Breast Radiotherapy Setup and Delivery Using Mixed-Reality Visualization, NCT05178927.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deib G, et al. Image guided percutaneous spine procedures using an optical see-through head mounted display: proof of concept and rationale. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(12):1187–91.CrossRefPubMed Deib G, et al. Image guided percutaneous spine procedures using an optical see-through head mounted display: proof of concept and rationale. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(12):1187–91.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gehrsitz P, et al. Cinematic rendering in Mixed-Reality holograms: a new 3D Preoperative Planning Tool in Pediatric Heart surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:633611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gehrsitz P, et al. Cinematic rendering in Mixed-Reality holograms: a new 3D Preoperative Planning Tool in Pediatric Heart surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:633611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Stojanovska M, et al. Mixed reality anatomy using Microsoft HoloLens and Cadaveric Dissection: a comparative effectiveness study. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(1):173–8.CrossRefPubMed Stojanovska M, et al. Mixed reality anatomy using Microsoft HoloLens and Cadaveric Dissection: a comparative effectiveness study. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(1):173–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vervoorn MT, et al. Mixed reality in Modern Surgical and Interventional Practice: Narrative Review of the literature. JMIR Serious Games. 2023;11:e41297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vervoorn MT, et al. Mixed reality in Modern Surgical and Interventional Practice: Narrative Review of the literature. JMIR Serious Games. 2023;11:e41297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Johnson PB, et al. Patient posture correction and alignment using mixed reality visualization and the HoloLens 2. Med Phys. 2022;49(1):15–22.CrossRefPubMed Johnson PB, et al. Patient posture correction and alignment using mixed reality visualization and the HoloLens 2. Med Phys. 2022;49(1):15–22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jackson A, et al. Evaluation of different holographic visualization techniques for surface-guided patient alignment using mixed reality (MixR) and the Microsoft Hololens 2. Med Phys. 2022;49(6):e400. Jackson A, et al. Evaluation of different holographic visualization techniques for surface-guided patient alignment using mixed reality (MixR) and the Microsoft Hololens 2. Med Phys. 2022;49(6):e400.
8.
go back to reference Cardan R, Covington EL, Popple R. A holographic augmented reality Guidance System for Patient Alignment: a feasibility study. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14695.PubMedPubMedCentral Cardan R, Covington EL, Popple R. A holographic augmented reality Guidance System for Patient Alignment: a feasibility study. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14695.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Tarutani K, et al. Development and accuracy evaluation of augmented reality-based patient positioning system in Radiotherapy: a Phantom Study. Vivo. 2021;35(4):2081–7.CrossRef Tarutani K, et al. Development and accuracy evaluation of augmented reality-based patient positioning system in Radiotherapy: a Phantom Study. Vivo. 2021;35(4):2081–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kramida G. Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in Head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016;22(7):1912–31.CrossRefPubMed Kramida G. Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in Head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016;22(7):1912–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Al-Hallaq HA et al. AAPM task group report 302: surface‐guided radiotherapy. Med Phys, 2022. 49(4). Al-Hallaq HA et al. AAPM task group report 302: surface‐guided radiotherapy. Med Phys, 2022. 49(4).
13.
go back to reference Stanley DN, et al. Comparison of initial patient setup accuracy between surface imaging and three point localization: a retrospective analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):58–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stanley DN, et al. Comparison of initial patient setup accuracy between surface imaging and three point localization: a retrospective analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):58–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference Hattel SH, et al. Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(6):39–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hattel SH, et al. Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(6):39–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Gierga DP, et al. Comparison of target registration errors for multiple image-guided techniques in accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(4):1239–46.CrossRefPubMed Gierga DP, et al. Comparison of target registration errors for multiple image-guided techniques in accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(4):1239–46.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Casari FA, et al. Augmented reality in orthopedic surgery is emerging from Proof of Concept towards Clinical studies: a Literature Review explaining the technology and current state of the art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(2):192–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Casari FA, et al. Augmented reality in orthopedic surgery is emerging from Proof of Concept towards Clinical studies: a Literature Review explaining the technology and current state of the art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(2):192–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Andrews CM, et al. Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensional augmented reality devices. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2021;9:4900214.CrossRefPubMed Andrews CM, et al. Registration techniques for clinical applications of three-dimensional augmented reality devices. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2021;9:4900214.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kunz C et al. Infrared marker tracking with the HoloLens for neurosurgical interventions. Curr Dir Biomedical Eng, 2020. 6(1). Kunz C et al. Infrared marker tracking with the HoloLens for neurosurgical interventions. Curr Dir Biomedical Eng, 2020. 6(1).
22.
go back to reference Martin-Gomez A et al. STTAR: Surgical Tool Tracking using off-the-Shelf augmented reality head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 2023. PP. Martin-Gomez A et al. STTAR: Surgical Tool Tracking using off-the-Shelf augmented reality head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 2023. PP.
23.
go back to reference Bolas MT et al. Perceptual issues in augmented reality. In Stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems III. 1996. p. 123–134. Bolas MT et al. Perceptual issues in augmented reality. In Stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems III. 1996. p. 123–134.
Metadata
Title
First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy
Authors
Perry B. Johnson
Julie Bradley
Samsun Lampotang
Amanda Jackson
David Lizdas
William Johnson
Eric Brooks
Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
Nancy Mendenhall
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0