Skip to main content
Top

Optimizing radiomics for prostate cancer diagnosis: feature selection strategies, machine learning classifiers, and MRI sequences

Published in:

Abstract

Objectives

Radiomics-based analyses encompass multiple steps, leading to ambiguity regarding the optimal approaches for enhancing model performance. This study compares the effect of several feature selection methods, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and sources of radiomic features, on models’ performance for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from bi-parametric MRI.

Methods

Two multi-centric datasets, with 465 and 204 patients each, were used to extract 1246 radiomic features per patient and MRI sequence. Ten feature selection methods, such as Boruta, mRMRe, ReliefF, recursive feature elimination (RFE), random forest (RF) variable importance, L1-lasso, etc., four ML classifiers, namely SVM, RF, LASSO, and boosted generalized linear model (GLM), and three sets of radiomics features, derived from T2w images, ADC maps, and their combination, were used to develop predictive models of csPCa. Their performance was evaluated in a nested cross-validation and externally, using seven performance metrics.

Results

In total, 480 models were developed. In nested cross-validation, the best model combined Boruta with Boosted GLM (AUC = 0.71, F1 = 0.76). In external validation, the best model combined L1-lasso with boosted GLM (AUC = 0.71, F1 = 0.47). Overall, Boruta, RFE, L1-lasso, and RF variable importance were the top-performing feature selection methods, while the choice of ML classifier didn’t significantly affect the results. The ADC-derived features showed the highest discriminatory power with T2w-derived features being less informative, while their combination did not lead to improved performance.

Conclusion

The choice of feature selection method and the source of radiomic features have a profound effect on the models’ performance for csPCa diagnosis.

Critical relevance statement

This work may guide future radiomic research, paving the way for the development of more effective and reliable radiomic models; not only for advancing prostate cancer diagnostic strategies, but also for informing broader applications of radiomics in different medical contexts.

Key Points

  • Radiomics is a growing field that can still be optimized.
  • Feature selection method impacts radiomics models’ performance more than ML algorithms.
  • Best feature selection methods: RFE, LASSO, RF, and Boruta.
  • ADC-derived radiomic features yield more robust models compared to T2w-derived radiomic features.

Graphical Abstract

Title
Optimizing radiomics for prostate cancer diagnosis: feature selection strategies, machine learning classifiers, and MRI sequences
Authors
Eugenia Mylona
Dimitrios I. Zaridis
Charalampos Ν. Kalantzopoulos
Nikolaos S. Tachos
Daniele Regge
Nikolaos Papanikolaou
Manolis Tsiknakis
Kostas Marias
Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
ProCAncer-I Consortium
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01783-9
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more
Image Credits
Alzheimer’s disease in the biomarker era: preparing the multidisciplinary care team/© Springer Healthcare IME, Navigating neuroimaging in Alzheimer’s care: Practical applications and strategies for integration/© Springer Health+ IME