Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 16-05-2024 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a Phase 1 clinical study in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer

Authors: Anri Inaki, Atsushi Mizokami, Hiroshi Wakabayashi, Kouji Izumi, Yoshifumi Kadono, Tadashi Toyama, Shizuko Takahara, Toshinori Murayama, Seigo Kinuya

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 8/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiopharmaceuticals allow whole-body imaging to detect prostate cancer (PC). Positron emission tomography imaging using gallium-68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 has been shown to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile and high diagnostic performance. The study evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

Methods

This single arm study enrolled Japanese patients with primary PC (n = 3), suspected recurrent PC following radical prostatectomy (n = 4), or suspected recurrent PC following radical radiotherapy (n = 3). All patients received a single intravenous dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 2.0 MBq/kg (±10%) followed by PSMA PET imaging and safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations. Based on the blood concentrations of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and the radioactivity distribution rate in each organ/tissue, the absorbed doses in major organs/tissues and the whole-body effective dose were calculated by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose method.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled. Mean age was 73.3 ± 4.8 years, and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.250 ng/mL. Five patients (50%) experienced a total of 6 adverse events, and no grade ≥ 2 adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, haematology parameters, or blood chemistry or ECG abnormalities were observed. The estimated whole body effective dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (mean ± standard deviation) was 2.524 × 10–2 ± 2.546 × 10–3 mSv/MBq. Time to maximum concentration (1.16 × 10–4 ± 1.3 × 10–5% ID/mL) in whole blood was 2.15 ± 0.33 min.

Conclusions

68Ga-PSMA-11 has a favourable safety and tolerability profile in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer, which is comparable to previous observations in other populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Saito E, Hori M, Matsuda T, Yoneoka D, Ito Y, Katanoda K. Long-term trends in prostate cancer incidence by stage at diagnosis in Japan using the multiple imputation approach, 1993–2014. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(6):1222–8.CrossRefPubMed Saito E, Hori M, Matsuda T, Yoneoka D, Ito Y, Katanoda K. Long-term trends in prostate cancer incidence by stage at diagnosis in Japan using the multiple imputation approach, 1993–2014. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(6):1222–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, Fanti S, Castellucci P. Current and emerging clinical applications of PSMA PET diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(5):596–604.CrossRefPubMed Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, Fanti S, Castellucci P. Current and emerging clinical applications of PSMA PET diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(5):596–604.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bois F, Noirot C, Dietemann S, Mainta IC, Zilli T, Garibotto V, Walter MA. [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;10(6):349–74.PubMedPubMedCentral Bois F, Noirot C, Dietemann S, Mainta IC, Zilli T, Garibotto V, Walter MA. [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;10(6):349–74.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16.CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1635–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1635–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell RR, Mishoe A, Feng FY, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell RR, Mishoe A, Feng FY, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332.
10.
go back to reference Menezes ME, Das SK, Minn I, Emdad L, Wang XY, Sarkar D, et al. Detecting tumor metastases: the road to therapy starts here. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;132:1–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menezes ME, Das SK, Minn I, Emdad L, Wang XY, Sarkar D, et al. Detecting tumor metastases: the road to therapy starts here. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;132:1–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Choueiri TK, Dreicer R, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Konety B. A model that predicts the probability of positive imaging in prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after initial definitive local therapy. J Urol. 2008;179(3):906–10.CrossRefPubMed Choueiri TK, Dreicer R, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Konety B. A model that predicts the probability of positive imaging in prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after initial definitive local therapy. J Urol. 2008;179(3):906–10.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology. 2007;243(1):28–53.CrossRefPubMed Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology. 2007;243(1):28–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, Salo JO, Taari K, Vehmas T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol. 1998;159(3):915–9.CrossRefPubMed Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, Salo JO, Taari K, Vehmas T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol. 1998;159(3):915–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1163–74.CrossRefPubMed Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1163–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Merdan S, Womble PR, Miller DC, Barnett C, Ye Z, Linsell SM, et al. Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;84(4):793–8.CrossRefPubMed Merdan S, Womble PR, Miller DC, Barnett C, Ye Z, Linsell SM, et al. Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;84(4):793–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pahwa S, Schiltz NK, Ponsky LE, Lu Z, Griswold MA, Gulani V. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided strategies for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Radiology. 2017;285(1):157–66.CrossRefPubMed Pahwa S, Schiltz NK, Ponsky LE, Lu Z, Griswold MA, Gulani V. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided strategies for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Radiology. 2017;285(1):157–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, An Y, Barocas D, Bitting R, et al. Prostate cancer, version 4.2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1067–96.CrossRefPubMed Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, An Y, Barocas D, Bitting R, et al. Prostate cancer, version 4.2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1067–96.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lawhn-Heath C, Salavati A, Behr SC, Rowe SP, Calais J, Fendler WP, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET in prostate cancer. Radiology. 2021;299(2):248–60.CrossRefPubMed Lawhn-Heath C, Salavati A, Behr SC, Rowe SP, Calais J, Fendler WP, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET in prostate cancer. Radiology. 2021;299(2):248–60.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Trabulsi EJ, Rumble RB, Jadvar H, Hope T, Pomper M, Turkbey B, et al. Optimum imaging strategies for advanced prostate cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1963–96.CrossRefPubMed Trabulsi EJ, Rumble RB, Jadvar H, Hope T, Pomper M, Turkbey B, et al. Optimum imaging strategies for advanced prostate cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1963–96.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Ballas LK, Choyke PL, Fanti S, Gulley JL, Herrmann K, et al. Appropriate use criteria for imaging evaluation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive primary treatment. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):552–62.CrossRefPubMed Jadvar H, Ballas LK, Choyke PL, Fanti S, Gulley JL, Herrmann K, et al. Appropriate use criteria for imaging evaluation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive primary treatment. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):552–62.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Eder M, Schafer M, Bauder-Wust U, Hull WE, Wangler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23(4):688–97.CrossRefPubMed Eder M, Schafer M, Bauder-Wust U, Hull WE, Wangler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23(4):688–97.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Abghari-Gerst M, Armstrong WR, Nguyen K, Calais J, Czernin J, Lin D, et al. A comprehensive assessment of (68)ga-psma-11 pet in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study on 2,005 patients. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(4):567–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abghari-Gerst M, Armstrong WR, Nguyen K, Calais J, Czernin J, Lin D, et al. A comprehensive assessment of (68)ga-psma-11 pet in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study on 2,005 patients. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(4):567–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Vlachostergios PJ, Niaz MJ, Sun M, Mosallaie SA, Thomas C, Christos PJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen uptake and survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 630589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vlachostergios PJ, Niaz MJ, Sun M, Mosallaie SA, Thomas C, Christos PJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen uptake and survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 630589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90.CrossRefPubMed Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Perera M, Papa N, Christidis D, Wetherell D, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive (68)ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):926–37.CrossRefPubMed Perera M, Papa N, Christidis D, Wetherell D, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive (68)ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):926–37.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G. (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(5):686–93.CrossRef von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G. (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(5):686–93.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Illuccix. Illuccix (kit for the preparation of gallium Ga 68 gozetotide injection) prescribing information. 2023. Illuccix. Illuccix (kit for the preparation of gallium Ga 68 gozetotide injection) prescribing information. 2023.
29.
go back to reference Watabe T, Uemura M, Soeda F, Naka S, Ujike T, Hatano K, et al. High detection rate in [(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET: interim results focusing on biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35(4):523–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watabe T, Uemura M, Soeda F, Naka S, Ujike T, Hatano K, et al. High detection rate in [(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET: interim results focusing on biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35(4):523–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Tateishi U, Kimura K, Tsuchiya J, Kano D, Watabe T, Nonomura N, et al. Phase I/IIa trial of 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 1007 PET/CT in healthy volunteers and prostate cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023;54(3):282–91.CrossRef Tateishi U, Kimura K, Tsuchiya J, Kano D, Watabe T, Nonomura N, et al. Phase I/IIa trial of 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 1007 PET/CT in healthy volunteers and prostate cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023;54(3):282–91.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, et al. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1466–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, et al. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1466–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Rauscher I, Kronke M, Konig M, Gafita A, Maurer T, Horn T, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)ga-psma-11 pet/ct and (18)f-psma-1007 pet/ct: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):51–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rauscher I, Kronke M, Konig M, Gafita A, Maurer T, Horn T, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)ga-psma-11 pet/ct and (18)f-psma-1007 pet/ct: frequency of pitfalls and detection efficacy in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):51–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Kroenke M, Mirzoyan L, Horn T, Peeken JC, Wurzer A, Wester HJ, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 and (18)F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in patients with primary and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: frequency of non-tumor-related Uptake and tumor positivity. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(8):1082–8.CrossRefPubMed Kroenke M, Mirzoyan L, Horn T, Peeken JC, Wurzer A, Wester HJ, et al. Matched-pair comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 and (18)F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in patients with primary and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: frequency of non-tumor-related Uptake and tumor positivity. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(8):1082–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Arnfield EG, Thomas PA, Roberts MJ, Pelecanos AM, Ramsay SC, Lin CY, et al. Clinical insignificance of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4495–507.CrossRefPubMed Arnfield EG, Thomas PA, Roberts MJ, Pelecanos AM, Ramsay SC, Lin CY, et al. Clinical insignificance of [(18)F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4495–507.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Grunig H, Maurer A, Thali Y, Kovacs Z, Strobel K, Burger IA, Muller J. Focal unspecific bone uptake on [(18)F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4483–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunig H, Maurer A, Thali Y, Kovacs Z, Strobel K, Burger IA, Muller J. Focal unspecific bone uptake on [(18)F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(13):4483–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, et al. Appropriate use criteria for prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(1):59–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, et al. Appropriate use criteria for prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(1):59–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a Phase 1 clinical study in Japanese patients with primary, recurrent, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer
Authors
Anri Inaki
Atsushi Mizokami
Hiroshi Wakabayashi
Kouji Izumi
Yoshifumi Kadono
Tadashi Toyama
Shizuko Takahara
Toshinori Murayama
Seigo Kinuya
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 8/2024
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-024-01931-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2024

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 8/2024 Go to the issue