Skip to main content
Top

29-01-2025 | Premature Rupture of Membranes | Commentary

Understanding the unique patient—causal singularism and patient reported outcomes

Authors: K. A. Meadows, M. Reaney

Published in: Quality of Life Research

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) now play a significant role in randomized control trials (RCTs) providing the basis for efficacy or safety endpoints. Most PROM data is quantitative and is summarized at the group level. Whilst PROM data is informative in providing the aggregated patient perspective on disease and interventions, it provides little information about the patients’ individual experiences. For this, qualitative ‘case study’ research is needed. However, qualitative case-study research has traditionally not been considered as robust for establishing causal inference due to its singular nature and lack of quantifiable findings. The focus of this paper was to advance a proposal as to how to produce a single mixed-methods case analysis of an individual’s experiences with treatment from PROM and narrative data that can be used in causal inference research; so-called “Causal singularism”.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cartwright, N. (2017). Single Case Causes: What Is Evidence and Why. In H. K. Chao & J. Reiss (Eds.), Philosophy of Science in Practice. Synthese Library, Springer. Cartwright, N. (2017). Single Case Causes: What Is Evidence and Why. In H. K. Chao & J. Reiss (Eds.), Philosophy of Science in Practice. Synthese Library, Springer.
2.
go back to reference Daskalopoulou, C., & Skaltsa, K. (2023). The importance of ensuring valid, reliable, responsive and interpretable patient experience data (PED). In M. Reaney (Ed.), Using Patient Experience Data to Evaluate Medical Interventions Generating, understanding and using patient experience data within and alongside clinical trials (pp. 129–155). NY: IQVIA. Daskalopoulou, C., & Skaltsa, K. (2023). The importance of ensuring valid, reliable, responsive and interpretable patient experience data (PED). In M. Reaney (Ed.), Using Patient Experience Data to Evaluate Medical Interventions Generating, understanding and using patient experience data within and alongside clinical trials (pp. 129–155). NY: IQVIA.
4.
go back to reference Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage. Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
7.
go back to reference Anjum, R. L. (2020). Dispositions and the Unique Patient. In R. L. Anjum, S. Copeland, & E. Rocca (Eds.), Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient. Springer.CrossRef Anjum, R. L. (2020). Dispositions and the Unique Patient. In R. L. Anjum, S. Copeland, & E. Rocca (Eds.), Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient. Springer.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cartwright, N. (2022). How to learn about causes in the single case. In J. Widner, M. Woolcock, & D. Ortega Nieto (Eds.), The case for case studies: Methods and applications in international development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cartwright, N. (2022). How to learn about causes in the single case. In J. Widner, M. Woolcock, & D. Ortega Nieto (Eds.), The case for case studies: Methods and applications in international development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
go back to reference Mumford, S., & Anjum, R. L. (2010). A powerful theory of causation. In A. Marmodoro (Ed.), The metaphysics of powers: Their grounding and their manifestations (pp. 143–159). Routledge. Mumford, S., & Anjum, R. L. (2010). A powerful theory of causation. In A. Marmodoro (Ed.), The metaphysics of powers: Their grounding and their manifestations (pp. 143–159). Routledge.
11.
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications Inc. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
16.
go back to reference Rothman, K. J. (2012). Epidemiology. An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford Univ Press. Rothman, K. J. (2012). Epidemiology. An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford Univ Press.
21.
go back to reference Anscombe, E. (1971). Causality and determination: An inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press. Anscombe, E. (1971). Causality and determination: An inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.
22.
go back to reference Gater, A., Reaney, M., Findley, A., Brun-Strang, C., Burrows, K., Nguyên-Pascal, M., & De Climens, A. R. (2019). Development and first use of the patient’s qualitative assessment of treatment (PQAT) questionnaire in type 2 diabetes mellitus to explore individualised benefit-harm of drugs received during clinical studies. Drug Safety, 43(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00877-4CrossRefPubMedCentral Gater, A., Reaney, M., Findley, A., Brun-Strang, C., Burrows, K., Nguyên-Pascal, M., & De Climens, A. R. (2019). Development and first use of the patient’s qualitative assessment of treatment (PQAT) questionnaire in type 2 diabetes mellitus to explore individualised benefit-harm of drugs received during clinical studies. Drug Safety, 43(2), 119–134. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40264-019-00877-4CrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Khan, A., Abbé, A., Falissard, B., Carita, P., Bachert, C., Mullol, J., Reaney, M., Chao, J., Mannent, L., Amin, N., Mahajan, P., Pirozzi, G., & Eckert, L. (2021). Data mining of free-text responses: An innovative approach to analyzing patient perspectives on treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a phase IIa proof-of-concept study for dupilumab. Patient Preference and Adherence, 15, 2577–2586. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s320242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan, A., Abbé, A., Falissard, B., Carita, P., Bachert, C., Mullol, J., Reaney, M., Chao, J., Mannent, L., Amin, N., Mahajan, P., Pirozzi, G., & Eckert, L. (2021). Data mining of free-text responses: An innovative approach to analyzing patient perspectives on treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a phase IIa proof-of-concept study for dupilumab. Patient Preference and Adherence, 15, 2577–2586. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2147/​ppa.​s320242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Moller, N., & Tischner, I. (2019). Qualitative story completion: A method with exciting promise (pp. 1479–1496). NY: Springer eBooks. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Moller, N., & Tischner, I. (2019). Qualitative story completion: A method with exciting promise (pp. 1479–1496). NY: Springer eBooks.
27.
go back to reference Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In W. R. Scott, J. W. Meyer, and Associates (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Sage Publications. NY, pp. 81–99 Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In W. R. Scott, J. W. Meyer, and Associates (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Sage Publications. NY, pp. 81–99
32.
go back to reference McCall, C., & Edwards, C. (2021). New perspectives for implementing grounded theory. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 93–107.CrossRef McCall, C., & Edwards, C. (2021). New perspectives for implementing grounded theory. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 93–107.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mfinanga, F. A., Mrosso, R. M., & Bishibura, S. (2019). Comparing case study and grounded theory as qualitative research approaches. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS), 02(05), 51–56. Mfinanga, F. A., Mrosso, R. M., & Bishibura, S. (2019). Comparing case study and grounded theory as qualitative research approaches. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS), 02(05), 51–56.
37.
go back to reference Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
38.
go back to reference Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1st ed.). Routledge. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1st ed.). Routledge.
39.
go back to reference Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
40.
go back to reference Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
42.
go back to reference Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The basics. Routledge. Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The basics. Routledge.
51.
go back to reference Low, M. (2020). Above and beyond statistical evidence. Why stories matter for clinical decisions and shared decision making. In R. L. Anjum, S. Copeland, & E. Rocca (Eds.), Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient. Cham: Springer. Low, M. (2020). Above and beyond statistical evidence. Why stories matter for clinical decisions and shared decision making. In R. L. Anjum, S. Copeland, & E. Rocca (Eds.), Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient. Cham: Springer.
53.
go back to reference DiLoreto, M., & Gaines, T. (2016). An investigation of discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative findings in survey research. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(12), 145–154. DiLoreto, M., & Gaines, T. (2016). An investigation of discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative findings in survey research. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(12), 145–154.
55.
go back to reference Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Sage. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Sage.
59.
go back to reference Atkinson, P. C. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. Altamira Press. Atkinson, P. C. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. Altamira Press.
62.
go back to reference Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Metadata
Title
Understanding the unique patient—causal singularism and patient reported outcomes
Authors
K. A. Meadows
M. Reaney
Publication date
29-01-2025
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03905-2