Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Pneumonia | Research

Clinical trial to verify the safety of an automatic electric airway suction system: a multicenter prospective randomized study

Authors: Han Young Lee, Hoonsung Park, Seungmin Baik, Jae-myeong Lee

Published in: European Journal of Medical Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Acute lung injury and respiratory failure in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) present challenges owing to varied factors. Manual suctioning, which is the current standard, burdens healthcare professionals and poses risks. The Lmeca.A1000 automatic suction device offers an innovative solution to this problem. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of this device.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial compared automatic and manual suction in ICU patients. Mucosal injury and pneumonia were assessed using bronchoscopy and monitoring. Mechanical stability and adverse events were also evaluated.

Results

In total, 117 critically ill adults were screened: 56 in the experimental group and 53 in the control group completing the study. No significant difference in mucosal injury was found at 3 or 7 days after treatment (p = 0.871, and 0.750). The incidence of VAP over 2 weeks was 5.36% in the experimental group and 1.89% in the control group, not significantly different (p = 0.582). Adverse events occurred in 14.3 and 13.2%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.870). The incidence of clinical trial device malfunction within 3 days of application was 0.03% and within 2 weeks of follow-up was 0.02%.

Conclusions

This study evidenced the non-inferiority of the automatic suction device to the manual method in terms of safety. The adoption of an automated system could alleviate the workload of healthcare professionals while maintaining effective airway management.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Torres A, et al. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Respir J. 2017. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ALAT):50.3 Torres A, et al. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Respir J. 2017. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ALAT):50.3
7.
go back to reference American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways. Respir Care. 2010;55:758–64. American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways. Respir Care. 2010;55:758–64.
Metadata
Title
Clinical trial to verify the safety of an automatic electric airway suction system: a multicenter prospective randomized study
Authors
Han Young Lee
Hoonsung Park
Seungmin Baik
Jae-myeong Lee
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-02126-6