Skip to main content
Top

25-09-2024 | Parkinson Disease | Review Article

TMS and tDCS as potential tools for the treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis

Authors: Andreina Giustiniani, Lorenza Maistrello, Valentina Mologni, Laura Danesin, Francesca Burgio

Published in: Neurological Sciences

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cognitive deficits are common nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) could be a potential aid to prevent or delay dementia progression in this clinical population. However, previous studies reported controversial results concerning their efficacy on cognitive symptoms of PD. Hence, the present meta-analysis aims to systematically examine the effects of NIBS as possible treatments for PD cognitive impairments. Understanding NIBS’ impact on these symptoms may be of outstanding importance to implement new therapeutic strategies and improve the patients’ quality of life.

Methods

EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for consecutive studies published from 2000 to March 2023 describing Randomized Controlled Trials studies evaluating the effect of NIBS on PD cognitive symptoms. From the included studies, data concerning neuropsychological tests were extracted and grouped into six cognitive domains, separately analyzed. Hedge’s method was computed as the effect size measure of the extracted data; heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were also assessed. The Cochrane’s RoB2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias for each of the included studies.

Results

After database searching and screening of texts, sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant results emerged from any investigated cognitive domain when comparing NIBS and sham treatments.

Conclusion

Several factors may have contributed to the lack of effects; among these, methodological choices, the small sample of studies, the high heterogeneity of data and stimulation protocols pose the need for more controlled studies to highlight the potentiality of NIBS as a future treatment for PD cognitive impairments.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacDonald BK, Cockerell OC, Sander J, Shorvon SD (2000) The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain 123(4):665–676PubMedCrossRef MacDonald BK, Cockerell OC, Sander J, Shorvon SD (2000) The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain 123(4):665–676PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Rijk MC et al (1997) Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the Europarkinson Collaborative Study European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62(1):10–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef de Rijk MC et al (1997) Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the Europarkinson Collaborative Study European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62(1):10–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lange F et al (2016) Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 93:142–150PubMedCrossRef Lange F et al (2016) Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 93:142–150PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Postuma RB et al (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30(12):1591–1601PubMedCrossRef Postuma RB et al (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30(12):1591–1601PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mantovani E, Zucchella C, Argyriou AA, Tamburin S (2023) Treatment for cognitive and neuropsychiatric non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: Current evidence and future perspectives. Expert Rev Neurother 23(1):25–43PubMedCrossRef Mantovani E, Zucchella C, Argyriou AA, Tamburin S (2023) Treatment for cognitive and neuropsychiatric non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: Current evidence and future perspectives. Expert Rev Neurother 23(1):25–43PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pellicano C, Benincasa D, Pisani V, Buttarelli FR, Giovannelli M, Pontieri FE (2007) Prodromal non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 3(1):145–152PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pellicano C, Benincasa D, Pisani V, Buttarelli FR, Giovannelli M, Pontieri FE (2007) Prodromal non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 3(1):145–152PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deeb W, Nozile-Firth K, Okun MS (2019) Parkinson’s disease: Diagnosis and appreciation of comorbidities. Handb Clin Neurol 167:257–277PubMedCrossRef Deeb W, Nozile-Firth K, Okun MS (2019) Parkinson’s disease: Diagnosis and appreciation of comorbidities. Handb Clin Neurol 167:257–277PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Litvan I et al (2012) Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force guidelines. Mov Disord 27(3):349–356PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Litvan I et al (2012) Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force guidelines. Mov Disord 27(3):349–356PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tröster AI (2008) Neuropsychological characteristics of dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease with dementia: differentiation, early detection, and implications for ‘mild cognitive impairment’ and biomarkers. Neuropsychol Rev 18:103–119PubMedCrossRef Tröster AI (2008) Neuropsychological characteristics of dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease with dementia: differentiation, early detection, and implications for ‘mild cognitive impairment’ and biomarkers. Neuropsychol Rev 18:103–119PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Goldman JG, Weintraub D (2015) Advances in the treatment of cognitive impairment in P arkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30(11):1471–1489PubMedCrossRef Goldman JG, Weintraub D (2015) Advances in the treatment of cognitive impairment in P arkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30(11):1471–1489PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gavelin HM et al (2022) Computerized cognitive training in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 80:101671PubMedCrossRef Gavelin HM et al (2022) Computerized cognitive training in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 80:101671PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Giustiniani A, Maistrello L, Danesin L, Rigon E, Burgio F (2022) Effects of cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 43(4):2323–2337PubMedCrossRef Giustiniani A, Maistrello L, Danesin L, Rigon E, Burgio F (2022) Effects of cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 43(4):2323–2337PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Madrid J, Benninger DH (2021) Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: Clinical evidence, latest concepts and future goals: A systematic review. J Neurosci Methods 347:108957PubMedCrossRef Madrid J, Benninger DH (2021) Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: Clinical evidence, latest concepts and future goals: A systematic review. J Neurosci Methods 347:108957PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boes AD, Kelly MS, Trapp NT, Stern AP, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A (2018) Noninvasive brain stimulation: challenges and opportunities for a new clinical specialty. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 30(3):173–179PubMedCrossRef Boes AD, Kelly MS, Trapp NT, Stern AP, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A (2018) Noninvasive brain stimulation: challenges and opportunities for a new clinical specialty. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 30(3):173–179PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Begemann MJ, Brand BA, Ćurčić-Blake B, Aleman A, Sommer IE (2020) Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 50(15):2465–2486PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Begemann MJ, Brand BA, Ćurčić-Blake B, Aleman A, Sommer IE (2020) Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 50(15):2465–2486PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hartwigsen G, Silvanto J (2023) Noninvasive brain stimulation: Multiple effects on cognition. Neuroscientist 29(5):639–653PubMedCrossRef Hartwigsen G, Silvanto J (2023) Noninvasive brain stimulation: Multiple effects on cognition. Neuroscientist 29(5):639–653PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cirillo G et al (2017) Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 10(1):1–18PubMedCrossRef Cirillo G et al (2017) Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 10(1):1–18PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miniussi C, Vallar G (2011) Brain stimulation and behavioural cognitive rehabilitation: a new tool for neurorehabilitation? Neuropsychol Rehabil 21(5):553–559PubMedCrossRef Miniussi C, Vallar G (2011) Brain stimulation and behavioural cognitive rehabilitation: a new tool for neurorehabilitation? Neuropsychol Rehabil 21(5):553–559PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Giustiniani A et al (2021) Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) does not affect sports people’s explosive power: a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci 15:640609PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giustiniani A et al (2021) Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) does not affect sports people’s explosive power: a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci 15:640609PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M (2012) tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216:1–10PubMedCrossRef Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M (2012) tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216:1–10PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Guo Z, McClure MA, He L, Mu Q (2020) Effect of rTMS on Parkinson’s cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 20:1–14CrossRef Jiang Y, Guo Z, McClure MA, He L, Mu Q (2020) Effect of rTMS on Parkinson’s cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 20:1–14CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Suarez-García DMA, Grisales-Cárdenas JS, Zimerman M, Cardona JF (2020) Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 11:597955PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Suarez-García DMA, Grisales-Cárdenas JS, Zimerman M, Cardona JF (2020) Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 11:597955PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Li R et al (2022) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor symptoms in parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 36(7):395–404PubMedCrossRef Li R et al (2022) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor symptoms in parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 36(7):395–404PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zhang W et al (2022) Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine 52:101589PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang W et al (2022) Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine 52:101589PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
38.
go back to reference R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2020 R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2020
40.
go back to reference Makkos A et al (2016) High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve depression in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychobiology 73(3):169–177PubMedCrossRef Makkos A et al (2016) High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve depression in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychobiology 73(3):169–177PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, CSM Group (2019) Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, pp. 241–284 Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, CSM Group (2019) Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, pp. 241–284
45.
go back to reference Zhuang S et al (2020) Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2020:1CrossRef Zhuang S et al (2020) Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2020:1CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Aksu S et al (2022) Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive impairment? An event-related potentials and neuropsychological assessment study. Neurol Sci 43(6):4029–4044PubMedCrossRef Aksu S et al (2022) Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive impairment? An event-related potentials and neuropsychological assessment study. Neurol Sci 43(6):4029–4044PubMedCrossRef
47.
48.
go back to reference Boggio PS et al (2006) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 249(1):31–38PubMedCrossRef Boggio PS et al (2006) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 249(1):31–38PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Buard I et al (2018) Transcranial magnetic stimulation does not improve mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 33(3):489PubMedCrossRef Buard I et al (2018) Transcranial magnetic stimulation does not improve mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 33(3):489PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Bueno MEB, do Nascimentoneto LI, Terra MB, Barboza NM, Okano AH, Smaili SM (2019) Effectiveness of acute transcranial direct current stimulation on non-motor and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 696:46–51PubMedCrossRef Bueno MEB, do Nascimentoneto LI, Terra MB, Barboza NM, Okano AH, Smaili SM (2019) Effectiveness of acute transcranial direct current stimulation on non-motor and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 696:46–51PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Ferrucci R et al (2016) Cerebellar and motor cortical transcranial stimulation decrease levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. The Cerebellum 15:43–47PubMedCrossRef Ferrucci R et al (2016) Cerebellar and motor cortical transcranial stimulation decrease levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. The Cerebellum 15:43–47PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference He W, Wang J-C, Tsai P-Y (2021) Theta burst magnetic stimulation improves Parkinson’s-related cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 35(11):986–995PubMedCrossRef He W, Wang J-C, Tsai P-Y (2021) Theta burst magnetic stimulation improves Parkinson’s-related cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 35(11):986–995PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Hill AT, McModie S, Fung W, Hoy KE, Chung S-W, Bertram KL (2020) Impact of prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation on working memory and executive function in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind sham-controlled pilot study. Brain Res 1726:146506PubMedCrossRef Hill AT, McModie S, Fung W, Hoy KE, Chung S-W, Bertram KL (2020) Impact of prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation on working memory and executive function in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind sham-controlled pilot study. Brain Res 1726:146506PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Khedr EM, Mohamed KO, Ali AM, Hasan AM (2020) The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease with dementia: Pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 38(1):55–66PubMed Khedr EM, Mohamed KO, Ali AM, Hasan AM (2020) The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease with dementia: Pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 38(1):55–66PubMed
56.
go back to reference Pal E, Nagy F, Aschermann Z, Balazs E, Kovacs N (2010) The impact of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mov Disord 25(14):2311–2317PubMedCrossRef Pal E, Nagy F, Aschermann Z, Balazs E, Kovacs N (2010) The impact of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mov Disord 25(14):2311–2317PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Sedláčková S, Rektorová I, Srovnalová H, Rektor I (2009) Effect of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on reaction time, clinical features and cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 116:1093–1101PubMedCrossRef Sedláčková S, Rektorová I, Srovnalová H, Rektor I (2009) Effect of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on reaction time, clinical features and cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 116:1093–1101PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Wei W, Yi X, Wu Z, Ruan J, Luo H, Duan X (2022) Acute improvement in the attention network with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil 44(25):7958–7966PubMedCrossRef Wei W, Yi X, Wu Z, Ruan J, Luo H, Duan X (2022) Acute improvement in the attention network with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil 44(25):7958–7966PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Esser SK, Huber R, Massimini M, Peterson MJ, Ferrarelli F, Tononi G (2006) A direct demonstration of cortical LTP in humans: a combined TMS/EEG study. Brain Res Bull 69(1):86–94PubMedCrossRef Esser SK, Huber R, Massimini M, Peterson MJ, Ferrarelli F, Tononi G (2006) A direct demonstration of cortical LTP in humans: a combined TMS/EEG study. Brain Res Bull 69(1):86–94PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Nitsche MA et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 1(3):206–223PubMedCrossRef Nitsche MA et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 1(3):206–223PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Priori A, Hallett M, Rothwell JC (2009) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation? Brain Stimul 2(4):241–245PubMedCrossRef Priori A, Hallett M, Rothwell JC (2009) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation? Brain Stimul 2(4):241–245PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Bailey M, Goldman JG (2017) Characterizing cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Sem Neurol 37:167–175 (Thieme Medical Publishers)CrossRef Bailey M, Goldman JG (2017) Characterizing cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Sem Neurol 37:167–175 (Thieme Medical Publishers)CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Costa AS, Dogan I, Schulz JB, Reetz K (2019) Going beyond the mean: Intraindividual variability of cognitive performance in prodromal and early neurodegenerative disorders. Clin Neuropsychol 33(2):369–389PubMedCrossRef Costa AS, Dogan I, Schulz JB, Reetz K (2019) Going beyond the mean: Intraindividual variability of cognitive performance in prodromal and early neurodegenerative disorders. Clin Neuropsychol 33(2):369–389PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Bezdicek O et al (2019) Memory impairment in Parkinson’s disease: The retrieval versus associative deficit hypothesis revisited and reconciled. Neuropsychology 33(3):391PubMedCrossRef Bezdicek O et al (2019) Memory impairment in Parkinson’s disease: The retrieval versus associative deficit hypothesis revisited and reconciled. Neuropsychology 33(3):391PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Cholerton BA et al (2021) Semantic fluency and processing speed are reduced in non-cognitively impaired participants with Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 43(5):469–480PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cholerton BA et al (2021) Semantic fluency and processing speed are reduced in non-cognitively impaired participants with Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 43(5):469–480PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Foo H et al (2017) Associations of hippocampal subfields in the progression of cognitive decline related to Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 14:37–42PubMedCrossRef Foo H et al (2017) Associations of hippocampal subfields in the progression of cognitive decline related to Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 14:37–42PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Chaudhary S et al (2020) Domain specific cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Neurosci 75:99–105PubMedCrossRef Chaudhary S et al (2020) Domain specific cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Neurosci 75:99–105PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference He X et al (2017) Changes in theta activities in the left posterior temporal region, left occipital region and right frontal region related to mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease patients. Int J Neurosci 127(1):66–72PubMedCrossRef He X et al (2017) Changes in theta activities in the left posterior temporal region, left occipital region and right frontal region related to mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease patients. Int J Neurosci 127(1):66–72PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Hara T, Shanmugalingam A, McIntyre A, Burhan AM (2021) The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on attention and memory function in stroke rehabilitation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics 11(2):227PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hara T, Shanmugalingam A, McIntyre A, Burhan AM (2021) The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on attention and memory function in stroke rehabilitation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics 11(2):227PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Alonzo A, Brassil J, Taylor JL, Martin D, Loo CK (2012) Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 5(3):208–213PubMedCrossRef Alonzo A, Brassil J, Taylor JL, Martin D, Loo CK (2012) Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 5(3):208–213PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Uysal-Cantürk P, Hanağası HA, Bilgiç B, Gürvit H, Emre M (2018) An assessment of movement disorder society task force diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 25(1):148–153PubMedCrossRef Uysal-Cantürk P, Hanağası HA, Bilgiç B, Gürvit H, Emre M (2018) An assessment of movement disorder society task force diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 25(1):148–153PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Lima CF, Meireles LP, Fonseca R, Castro SL, Garrett C (2008) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson’s disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning. J Neurol 255:1756–1761PubMedCrossRef Lima CF, Meireles LP, Fonseca R, Castro SL, Garrett C (2008) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson’s disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning. J Neurol 255:1756–1761PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Mitchell AJ (2013) The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): an update on its diagnostic validity for cognitive disorders. Cognitive screening instruments: A practical approach, pp. 15–46 Mitchell AJ (2013) The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): an update on its diagnostic validity for cognitive disorders. Cognitive screening instruments: A practical approach, pp. 15–46
78.
go back to reference Arevalo-Rodriguez I et al. (2021) Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 Arevalo-Rodriguez I et al. (2021) Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7
80.
go back to reference Mattis PJ, Tang CC, Ma Y, Dhawan V, Eidelberg D (2011) Network correlates of the cognitive response to levodopa in Parkinson disease. Neurology 77(9):858–865PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mattis PJ, Tang CC, Ma Y, Dhawan V, Eidelberg D (2011) Network correlates of the cognitive response to levodopa in Parkinson disease. Neurology 77(9):858–865PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Bierman EJM, Comijs HC, Jonker C, Beekman ATF (2005) Effects of anxiety versus depression on cognition in later life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13(8):686–693PubMedCrossRef Bierman EJM, Comijs HC, Jonker C, Beekman ATF (2005) Effects of anxiety versus depression on cognition in later life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13(8):686–693PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Hara T, Shanmugalingam A, McIntyre A, Burhan AM (2021) The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on executive functioning, attention and memory in rehabilitation patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Diagnostics 11(4):627PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hara T, Shanmugalingam A, McIntyre A, Burhan AM (2021) The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on executive functioning, attention and memory in rehabilitation patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Diagnostics 11(4):627PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Teselink J et al (2021) Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 72:101499PubMedCrossRef Teselink J et al (2021) Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 72:101499PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Biundo R et al (2015) Double-blind randomized trial of t-DCS versus sham in Parkinson patients with mild cognitive impairment receiving cognitive training. Brain Stimul: Basic, Transl, Clin Res Neuromodul 8(6):1223–1225CrossRef Biundo R et al (2015) Double-blind randomized trial of t-DCS versus sham in Parkinson patients with mild cognitive impairment receiving cognitive training. Brain Stimul: Basic, Transl, Clin Res Neuromodul 8(6):1223–1225CrossRef
85.
go back to reference Manenti R et al (2016) M ild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease is improved by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical therapy. Mov Disord 31(5):715–724PubMedCrossRef Manenti R et al (2016) M ild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease is improved by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical therapy. Mov Disord 31(5):715–724PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
TMS and tDCS as potential tools for the treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis
Authors
Andreina Giustiniani
Lorenza Maistrello
Valentina Mologni
Laura Danesin
Francesca Burgio
Publication date
25-09-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Neurological Sciences
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07778-0

Advances in Alzheimer's

Alzheimer's research and care is changing rapidly. Keep up with the latest developments from key international conferences, together with expert insights on how to integrate these advances into practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more