Comparison of first-line cetuximab and panitumumab plus doublet chemotherapies for left-sided colorectal cancer: a multicenter real-world observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
- 04-03-2026
- Panitumumab
- Original Article
- Authors
- Ryosuke Kawagoe
- Toshikazu Moriwaki
- Kentaro Yamazaki
- Hiroki Yukami
- Hiroyuki Uetake
- Masahiro Tsuda
- Takeshi Suto
- Naotoshi Sugimoto
- Hitoshi Ojima
- Yasumasa Takii
- Hisateru Yasui
- Masato Komoda
- Yasuhiro Shimada
- Akihito Tsuji
- Toshifumi Yamaguchi
- Ryoichi Sawada
- Katsunori Shinozaki
- Satoshi Otsu
- Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
- Kenji Tsuchihashi
- Takao Tamura
- Manabu Shiozawa
- Hideki Ueno
- Tadamichi Denda
- Takahiko Ito
- Atsuo Takashima
- Published in
- International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract
Background
For patients with left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the recommended first-line treatment is anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies, such as cetuximab or panitumumab, plus doublet chemotherapy. However, the differences in outcomes between cetuximab and panitumumab remain unknown.
Methods
Clinical data of patients with left-sided all RAS or KRAS wild-type mCRC who received cetuximab or panitumumab plus doublet chemotherapy were retrospectively collected from 24 institutions in Japan. The patients were divided into two groups: the cetuximab and panitumumab groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR) were compared between the two groups.
Results
A total of 233 patients were enrolled: 87 (37.3%) in the cetuximab group and 146 (62.7%) in the panitumumab group. Median OS, PFS, and RR of the cetuximab and panitumumab groups were 26.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7–33.4) versus 31.8 months (95% CI, 25.7–37.9), 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.9–12.5) versus 12.4 months (11.1–13.7), and 57.8% versus 71.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, OS and RR were significantly better in the panitumumab group than in the cetuximab group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.99, p = 0.04; adjusted odds ratio 2.00, 95% CI 1.07–3.73, p = 0.03) and PFS was similar between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.55–1.01, p = 0.05).
Conclusion
As a first-line treatment for patients with left-sided all RAS or KRAS wild-type mCRC, panitumumab plus doublet chemotherapy may be suggested better efficacy outcomes than cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy.
Advertisement
- Title
- Comparison of first-line cetuximab and panitumumab plus doublet chemotherapies for left-sided colorectal cancer: a multicenter real-world observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
- Authors
-
Ryosuke Kawagoe
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Kentaro Yamazaki
Hiroki Yukami
Hiroyuki Uetake
Masahiro Tsuda
Takeshi Suto
Naotoshi Sugimoto
Hitoshi Ojima
Yasumasa Takii
Hisateru Yasui
Masato Komoda
Yasuhiro Shimada
Akihito Tsuji
Toshifumi Yamaguchi
Ryoichi Sawada
Katsunori Shinozaki
Satoshi Otsu
Kunitoshi Shigeyasu
Kenji Tsuchihashi
Takao Tamura
Manabu Shiozawa
Hideki Ueno
Tadamichi Denda
Takahiko Ito
Atsuo Takashima
- Publication date
- 04-03-2026
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Singapore
- Published in
-
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-02999-z
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.