Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 11-02-2025 | Pancreatic Cancer | Review

Current Approaches of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals

Authors: Melissa Heller, Derek A. Mann, Bryson W. Katona

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer | Issue 1/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Currently, those recommended to undergo pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance include appropriately aged individuals at high risk of PC due to an identifiable genetic susceptibility or those without identifiable genetic susceptibility who nonetheless have a strong family history of PC. With increases in identification of individuals at high risk for PC and increased use of PC surveillance in clinical practice, there has been increasing debate about who should undergo surveillance as well as how surveillance should be performed including use of imaging and blood-based testing. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in the outcomes of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals with some studies demonstrating that surveillance leads to downstaging of PC and improvements in survival. In this review, we summarize the current state of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals, providing an overview of the risk factors associated with PC, selection of high-risk individuals for PC surveillance, and the current, but non-uniform, recommendations for performing PC surveillance. Additionally, we review approaches to apply various imaging and blood-based tests to surveillance and the outcomes of PC surveillance.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Abboud Y, et al. Increasing pancreatic cancer incidence in young women in the United States: a population-based time-trend analysis, 2001–2018. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(6):978-989.e6.PubMedCrossRef Abboud Y, et al. Increasing pancreatic cancer incidence in young women in the United States: a population-based time-trend analysis, 2001–2018. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(6):978-989.e6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ilic I, Ilic M. International patterns in incidence and mortality trends of pancreatic cancer in the last three decades: a joinpoint regression analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(32):4698–715.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ilic I, Ilic M. International patterns in incidence and mortality trends of pancreatic cancer in the last three decades: a joinpoint regression analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(32):4698–715.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stoffel EM, Brand RE, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer: changing epidemiology and new approaches to risk assessment, early detection, and prevention. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(5):752–65.PubMedCrossRef Stoffel EM, Brand RE, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer: changing epidemiology and new approaches to risk assessment, early detection, and prevention. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(5):752–65.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Blackford AL, et al. Recent trends in the incidence and survival of Stage 1A pancreatic cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(11):1162–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Blackford AL, et al. Recent trends in the incidence and survival of Stage 1A pancreatic cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(11):1162–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hu C, et al. Association between inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2401–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu C, et al. Association between inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2401–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Yurgelun MB, et al. Germline cancer susceptibility gene variants, somatic second hits, and survival outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Genet Med. 2019;21(1):213–23.PubMedCrossRef Yurgelun MB, et al. Germline cancer susceptibility gene variants, somatic second hits, and survival outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Genet Med. 2019;21(1):213–23.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dal Buono A, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer or suspected related hereditary syndromes: historical prospective analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(6):1852.CrossRef Dal Buono A, et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer or suspected related hereditary syndromes: historical prospective analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(6):1852.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Geyer CE Jr, et al. Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(12):1250–68.PubMedCrossRef Geyer CE Jr, et al. Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(12):1250–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maxwell KN, et al. Population frequency of germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4183–5.PubMedCrossRef Maxwell KN, et al. Population frequency of germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4183–5.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katona BW, et al. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Cancer. 2025;131(1):e35666. Katona BW, et al. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Cancer. 2025;131(1):e35666.
17.
go back to reference Yang X, et al. Cancer risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants: an international study of 524 families. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(7):674–85.PubMedCrossRef Yang X, et al. Cancer risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants: an international study of 524 families. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(7):674–85.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Møller P, et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018;67(7):1306–16.PubMedCrossRef Møller P, et al. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018;67(7):1306–16.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hsu FC, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer among individuals with pathogenic variants in the ATM gene. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1664–8.PubMedCrossRef Hsu FC, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer among individuals with pathogenic variants in the ATM gene. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1664–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tacheci I, Kopacova M, Bures J. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(3):245–54.PubMedCrossRef Tacheci I, Kopacova M, Bures J. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(3):245–54.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Giardiello FM, et al. Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(6):1447–53.PubMedCrossRef Giardiello FM, et al. Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(6):1447–53.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference van Lier MG, et al. High cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and surveillance recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(6):1258–64.PubMedCrossRef van Lier MG, et al. High cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and surveillance recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(6):1258–64.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sargen MR, et al. CDKN2A mutations with p14 loss predisposing to multiple nerve sheath tumours, melanoma, dysplastic naevi and internal malignancies: a case series and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(4):785–9.PubMedCrossRef Sargen MR, et al. CDKN2A mutations with p14 loss predisposing to multiple nerve sheath tumours, melanoma, dysplastic naevi and internal malignancies: a case series and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(4):785–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vasen HF, et al. Risk of developing pancreatic cancer in families with familial atypical multiple mole melanoma associated with a specific 19 deletion of p16 (p16-Leiden). Int J Cancer. 2000;87(6):809–11.PubMedCrossRef Vasen HF, et al. Risk of developing pancreatic cancer in families with familial atypical multiple mole melanoma associated with a specific 19 deletion of p16 (p16-Leiden). Int J Cancer. 2000;87(6):809–11.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fu Y, Lucas AL. Genetic evaluation of pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022;32(1):27–43.PubMedCrossRef Fu Y, Lucas AL. Genetic evaluation of pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022;32(1):27–43.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Greenhalf W et al. International consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology. 2020;20(5): 910–918. Greenhalf W et al. International consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology. 2020;20(5): 910–918.
29.
30.
go back to reference Pierce BL, et al. Unidentified genetic variants influence pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis of polygenic susceptibility in the PanScan study. Genet Epidemiol. 2012;36(5):517–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pierce BL, et al. Unidentified genetic variants influence pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis of polygenic susceptibility in the PanScan study. Genet Epidemiol. 2012;36(5):517–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
34.
go back to reference Iodice S, et al. Tobacco and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(4):535–45.PubMedCrossRef Iodice S, et al. Tobacco and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(4):535–45.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Klein AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(7):493–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Klein AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(7):493–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(1):186–98.PubMedCrossRef Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(1):186–98.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lucenteforte E, et al. Alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis in the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4). Ann Oncol. 2012;23(2):374–82.PubMedCrossRef Lucenteforte E, et al. Alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis in the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4). Ann Oncol. 2012;23(2):374–82.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, et al. Lifetime adiposity and risk of pancreatic cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1057–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, et al. Lifetime adiposity and risk of pancreatic cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1057–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Michaud DS, et al. Physical activity, obesity, height, and the risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2001;286(8):921–9.PubMedCrossRef Michaud DS, et al. Physical activity, obesity, height, and the risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA. 2001;286(8):921–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Farias AJ, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in weight or BMI change in adulthood and pancreatic cancer incidence: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):4097–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Farias AJ, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in weight or BMI change in adulthood and pancreatic cancer incidence: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):4097–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ling S, et al. Association of type 2 diabetes with cancer: a meta-analysis with bias analysis for unmeasured confounding in 151 cohorts comprising 32 million people. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(9):2313–22.PubMedCrossRef Ling S, et al. Association of type 2 diabetes with cancer: a meta-analysis with bias analysis for unmeasured confounding in 151 cohorts comprising 32 million people. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(9):2313–22.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chari ST, et al. Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):504–11.PubMedCrossRef Chari ST, et al. Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):504–11.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Pannala R, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):981–7.PubMedCrossRef Pannala R, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):981–7.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Dankner R, et al. Time-dependent risk of cancer after a diabetes diagnosis in a cohort of 2.3 million adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(12):1098–106.PubMedCrossRef Dankner R, et al. Time-dependent risk of cancer after a diabetes diagnosis in a cohort of 2.3 million adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(12):1098–106.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Batabyal P, et al. Association of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of 88 studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2453–62.PubMedCrossRef Batabyal P, et al. Association of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of 88 studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2453–62.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Ben Q, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(13):1928–37.PubMedCrossRef Ben Q, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(13):1928–37.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Huang BZ, et al. New-onset diabetes, longitudinal trends in metabolic markers, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a heterogeneous population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1812-1821.e7.PubMedCrossRef Huang BZ, et al. New-onset diabetes, longitudinal trends in metabolic markers, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a heterogeneous population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1812-1821.e7.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Setiawan VW, et al. Pancreatic cancer following incident diabetes in African Americans and Latinos: the multiethnic cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(1):27–33.PubMedCrossRef Setiawan VW, et al. Pancreatic cancer following incident diabetes in African Americans and Latinos: the multiethnic cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(1):27–33.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Del Chiaro M, et al. Familial pancreatic cancer in Italy. Risk assessment, screening programs and clinical approach: a position paper from the Italian Registry. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(9):597–605.PubMedCrossRef Del Chiaro M, et al. Familial pancreatic cancer in Italy. Risk assessment, screening programs and clinical approach: a position paper from the Italian Registry. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(9):597–605.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Canto MI, et al. International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013;62(3):339–47.PubMedCrossRef Canto MI, et al. International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013;62(3):339–47.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Shah I, et al. Pancreatic Cancer screening for at-risk individuals (pancreas scan study): yield, harms, and outcomes from a prospective multicenter study. Off J Am College Gastroenterol ACG. 2023;118(9):1664–70.CrossRef Shah I, et al. Pancreatic Cancer screening for at-risk individuals (pancreas scan study): yield, harms, and outcomes from a prospective multicenter study. Off J Am College Gastroenterol ACG. 2023;118(9):1664–70.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Owens DK, et al. Screening for pancreatic cancer: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322(5):438–44.PubMedCrossRef Owens DK, et al. Screening for pancreatic cancer: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322(5):438–44.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Aslanian HR, Lee JH, Canto MI. AGA clinical practice update on pancreas cancer screening in high-risk individuals: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):358–62.PubMedCrossRef Aslanian HR, Lee JH, Canto MI. AGA clinical practice update on pancreas cancer screening in high-risk individuals: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):358–62.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Sawhney MS, et al. ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(5):817–26.PubMedCrossRef Sawhney MS, et al. ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(5):817–26.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Goggins M, et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut. 2020;69(1):7–17.PubMedCrossRef Goggins M, et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut. 2020;69(1):7–17.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Conroy T, et al. Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(11):987–1002.PubMedCrossRef Conroy T, et al. Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(11):987–1002.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Yurgelun MB. Building on more than 20 years of progress in pancreatic cancer surveillance for high-risk individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3230–4.PubMedCrossRef Yurgelun MB. Building on more than 20 years of progress in pancreatic cancer surveillance for high-risk individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3230–4.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Klatte DCF, et al. Pancreatic cancer surveillance in carriers of a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant: yield and outcomes of a 20-year prospective follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3267–77.PubMedCrossRef Klatte DCF, et al. Pancreatic cancer surveillance in carriers of a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant: yield and outcomes of a 20-year prospective follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(28):3267–77.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Farr KP, et al. Imaging modalities for early detection of pancreatic cancer: current state and future research opportunities. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(10):2539.PubMedCrossRef Farr KP, et al. Imaging modalities for early detection of pancreatic cancer: current state and future research opportunities. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(10):2539.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Huang C, et al. Standardization of MRI screening and reporting in individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: consensus statement of the PRECEDE Consortium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;219(6):903–14.PubMedCrossRef Huang C, et al. Standardization of MRI screening and reporting in individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: consensus statement of the PRECEDE Consortium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;219(6):903–14.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Overbeek KA, et al. Long-term yield of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. Gut. 2022;71(6):1152–60.PubMedCrossRef Overbeek KA, et al. Long-term yield of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. Gut. 2022;71(6):1152–60.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Kumar S, et al. Upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(4):1000.PubMedCrossRef Kumar S, et al. Upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(4):1000.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Yamamiya A, et al. Interobserver reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography: literature review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11). Yamamiya A, et al. Interobserver reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography: literature review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11).
78.
go back to reference Edelman RR. MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;15(3):349–53.PubMedCrossRef Edelman RR. MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;15(3):349–53.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Onishi H, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(9):559–65.PubMedCrossRef Onishi H, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(9):559–65.PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Toft J, et al. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2017;92:17–23.PubMedCrossRef Toft J, et al. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2017;92:17–23.PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Boekestijn B, et al. Screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals using MRI: optimization of scan techniques to detect small lesions. Fam Cancer. 2024;23(3):295–308.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Boekestijn B, et al. Screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals using MRI: optimization of scan techniques to detect small lesions. Fam Cancer. 2024;23(3):295–308.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Tanaka M, et al. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2017;17(5):738–53.PubMedCrossRef Tanaka M, et al. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2017;17(5):738–53.PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Risch HA. Diabetes and pancreatic cancer: both cause and effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(1):1–2.PubMedCrossRef Risch HA. Diabetes and pancreatic cancer: both cause and effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(1):1–2.PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Singhi AD, et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: opportunities and challenges. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(7):2024–40.PubMedCrossRef Singhi AD, et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: opportunities and challenges. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(7):2024–40.PubMedCrossRef
87.
88.
go back to reference Bogdanski AM, et al. The added value of blood glucose monitoring in high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance. Pancreas. 2024;53(7):e566–72.PubMedCrossRef Bogdanski AM, et al. The added value of blood glucose monitoring in high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance. Pancreas. 2024;53(7):e566–72.PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Partyka O, et al. Overview of pancreatic cancer epidemiology in Europe and recommendations for screening in high-risk populations. Cancers. 2023;15(14):3634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Partyka O, et al. Overview of pancreatic cancer epidemiology in Europe and recommendations for screening in high-risk populations. Cancers. 2023;15(14):3634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
90.
go back to reference Hartwig W, et al. CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2188–96.PubMedCrossRef Hartwig W, et al. CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2188–96.PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Canto MI, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):796–804.PubMedCrossRef Canto MI, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):796–804.PubMedCrossRef
92.
93.
go back to reference Kajbafzadeh AM, et al. Urinary and serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 as a biomarker in ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Urol. 2010;183(6):2353–60.PubMedCrossRef Kajbafzadeh AM, et al. Urinary and serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 as a biomarker in ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Urol. 2010;183(6):2353–60.PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference Dyckhoff G, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19–9 in saliva: possible preoperative marker of malignancy in parotid tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(5):772–7.PubMedCrossRef Dyckhoff G, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19–9 in saliva: possible preoperative marker of malignancy in parotid tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(5):772–7.PubMedCrossRef
96.
go back to reference Roy S, Dasgupta A, Kar K. Comparison of urinary and serum CA 19–9 as markers of early stage urothelial carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(5):631–8.PubMedCrossRef Roy S, Dasgupta A, Kar K. Comparison of urinary and serum CA 19–9 as markers of early stage urothelial carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(5):631–8.PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Katona BW, et al. Outcomes of the IMMray PanCan-d test in high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic surveillance: pragmatic data and lessons learned. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023;7:e2300445.PubMedCrossRef Katona BW, et al. Outcomes of the IMMray PanCan-d test in high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic surveillance: pragmatic data and lessons learned. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023;7:e2300445.PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Fahrmann JF, et al. Lead-time trajectory of CA19-9 as an anchor marker for pancreatic cancer early detection. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(4):1373-1383.e6.PubMedCrossRef Fahrmann JF, et al. Lead-time trajectory of CA19-9 as an anchor marker for pancreatic cancer early detection. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(4):1373-1383.e6.PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Dbouk M, et al. Diagnostic performance of a tumor marker gene test to personalize serum CA19-9 reference ranges. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29(20):4178–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dbouk M, et al. Diagnostic performance of a tumor marker gene test to personalize serum CA19-9 reference ranges. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29(20):4178–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
go back to reference Luo G, et al. Optimize CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer by Lewis and Secretor genotyping. Pancreatology. 2016;16(6):1057–62.PubMedCrossRef Luo G, et al. Optimize CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer by Lewis and Secretor genotyping. Pancreatology. 2016;16(6):1057–62.PubMedCrossRef
101.
go back to reference Wannhoff A, et al. A common genetic variant of fucosyltransferase 2 correlates with serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and affects cancer screening in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(1):84–91.PubMedCrossRef Wannhoff A, et al. A common genetic variant of fucosyltransferase 2 correlates with serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and affects cancer screening in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(1):84–91.PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Wannhoff A, et al. FUT2 and FUT3 genotype determines CA19-9 cut-off values for detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013;59(6):1278–84.PubMedCrossRef Wannhoff A, et al. FUT2 and FUT3 genotype determines CA19-9 cut-off values for detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013;59(6):1278–84.PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Abe T, et al. Gene variants that affect levels of circulating tumor markers increase identification of patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(5):1161-1169.e5.PubMedCrossRef Abe T, et al. Gene variants that affect levels of circulating tumor markers increase identification of patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(5):1161-1169.e5.PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference Ando Y, et al. Using tumor marker gene variants to improve the diagnostic accuracy of DUPAN-2 and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 for pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(18):2196–206.PubMedCrossRef Ando Y, et al. Using tumor marker gene variants to improve the diagnostic accuracy of DUPAN-2 and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 for pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(18):2196–206.PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference Brand RE, et al. Detection of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from blood samples: results of a multiplex biomarker signature validation study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022;13(3):e00468.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brand RE, et al. Detection of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from blood samples: results of a multiplex biomarker signature validation study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022;13(3):e00468.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
107.
go back to reference Lennon AM, et al. Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention. Science. 2020;369(6499). Lennon AM, et al. Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention. Science. 2020;369(6499).
108.
109.
110.
go back to reference Klein EA, et al. Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(9):1167–77.PubMedCrossRef Klein EA, et al. Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(9):1167–77.PubMedCrossRef
111.
go back to reference Guler GD, et al. Detection of early stage pancreatic cancer using 5-hydroxymethylcytosine signatures in circulating cell free DNA. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guler GD, et al. Detection of early stage pancreatic cancer using 5-hydroxymethylcytosine signatures in circulating cell free DNA. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
113.
go back to reference Mattox AK, et al. The origin of highly elevated cell-free DNA in healthy individuals and patients with pancreatic, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(10):2166–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mattox AK, et al. The origin of highly elevated cell-free DNA in healthy individuals and patients with pancreatic, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(10):2166–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
114.
go back to reference Chan HT, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in liquid biopsy: from biological noise to valuable clinical implications. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(8):2277.PubMedCrossRef Chan HT, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in liquid biopsy: from biological noise to valuable clinical implications. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(8):2277.PubMedCrossRef
116.
go back to reference Corral JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals: an economic analysis. Pancreas. 2019;48(4):526–36.PubMedCrossRef Corral JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals: an economic analysis. Pancreas. 2019;48(4):526–36.PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference Kumar S, et al. Threshold analysis of the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound in patients at high risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2021;50(6):807–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kumar S, et al. Threshold analysis of the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound in patients at high risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2021;50(6):807–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Vasen H, et al. Benefit of surveillance for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals: outcome of long-term prospective follow-up studies from three European expert centers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(17):2010–9.PubMedCrossRef Vasen H, et al. Benefit of surveillance for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals: outcome of long-term prospective follow-up studies from three European expert centers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(17):2010–9.PubMedCrossRef
119.
go back to reference Paiella S, et al. Outcomes of a 3-year prospective surveillance in individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(4):739–47.PubMed Paiella S, et al. Outcomes of a 3-year prospective surveillance in individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(4):739–47.PubMed
120.
go back to reference Canto MI, et al. Risk of neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer undergoing long-term surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(3):740-751 e2.PubMedCrossRef Canto MI, et al. Risk of neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer undergoing long-term surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(3):740-751 e2.PubMedCrossRef
122.
go back to reference Overbeek KA, et al. Timeline of development of pancreatic cancer and implications for successful early detection in high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(3):772-785 e4.PubMedCrossRef Overbeek KA, et al. Timeline of development of pancreatic cancer and implications for successful early detection in high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(3):772-785 e4.PubMedCrossRef
124.
go back to reference Paiella S, et al. Surveillance of individuals at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer: a prevalence meta-analysis to estimate the rate of low-yield surgery. Ann Surg. 2024;279(1):37–44.PubMed Paiella S, et al. Surveillance of individuals at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer: a prevalence meta-analysis to estimate the rate of low-yield surgery. Ann Surg. 2024;279(1):37–44.PubMed
125.
go back to reference Canto MI, et al. Surgical outcomes after pancreatic resection of screening-detected lesions in individuals at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(5):1101–10.PubMedCrossRef Canto MI, et al. Surgical outcomes after pancreatic resection of screening-detected lesions in individuals at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(5):1101–10.PubMedCrossRef
126.
go back to reference Konings IC, et al. Factors associated with cancer worries in individuals participating in annual pancreatic cancer surveillance. Fam Cancer. 2017;16(1):143–51.PubMedCrossRef Konings IC, et al. Factors associated with cancer worries in individuals participating in annual pancreatic cancer surveillance. Fam Cancer. 2017;16(1):143–51.PubMedCrossRef
127.
go back to reference Anez-Bruzual I, et al. Assessment of the psychosocial impact of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. Cancers (Basel). 2023;16(1):86.PubMedCrossRef Anez-Bruzual I, et al. Assessment of the psychosocial impact of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals. Cancers (Basel). 2023;16(1):86.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current Approaches of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals
Authors
Melissa Heller
Derek A. Mann
Bryson W. Katona
Publication date
11-02-2025
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer / Issue 1/2025
Print ISSN: 1941-6628
Electronic ISSN: 1941-6636
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01184-1