Skip to main content
Top

27-09-2024 | Ovarian Cancer | Original Article

Effect of the Number of Negative Lymph Nodes Removed on the Survival and Recurrence Rate After Primary Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors: Elham Rahimpour, Behnaz Niroomand, Maryam Kalatehjari, Fatemeh Shahbakhti, Mansour Bahardoust, Babak Goodarzy, Fatemeh Majdolashrafi, Sara Ghorbanzade, Adnan Tizmaghz

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

Login to get access

Abstract

The effect of the number of negative lymph nodes (NLNs) removed on the overall survival (OS) and recurrence rate of ovarian cancer (OC) patients has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of NLNs removed on OC patients’ survival and recurrence rate after primary surgery. In this multi-center cohort study, the medical profile of 504 OC patients (mean age 55.21 years and mean follow-up 78.5 ± 28.4 months) who underwent primary surgery between 2011 and 2021 in gynecological tumor surgery centers affiliated with Iran and Shahid Beheshti Universities of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, was retrospectively examined. Based on the number of NLNs removed, patients were divided into four groups, including 0–9, 10–19, 20–30, and > 30 NLNs, including 152, 169, 124, and 59 OC patients, respectively. The 5-year survival was 49.1%. The median survival was 61 months. The RFS and OS were significantly better in patients with more than 30 NLNs removed compared to other groups. The multivariable analysis showed that the OS rate was significantly better in patients with the number of NLNs removed ≥ 20 compared to < 20 (HR, 1.88; 95% CI 1.15–2.62; p, 0.001). Also, age, FIGO stage, presence of metastasis, adjuvant therapy, and tumor pathological differentiation were significantly related to the OS of OC patients (p < 0.05). Paying attention to the number of NLNs removed during primary surgery can be a key factor in improving the OS rate of OC patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J et al (2019) Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 144(8):1941–1953CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J et al (2019) Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 144(8):1941–1953CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mazidimoradi A et al (2022) The global, regional and national epidemiology, incidence, mortality, and burden of ovarian cancer. Health Science Reports 5(6):e936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazidimoradi A et al (2022) The global, regional and national epidemiology, incidence, mortality, and burden of ovarian cancer. Health Science Reports 5(6):e936CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Momenimovahed Z et al (2019) Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Women’s Health 11:287–299CrossRef Momenimovahed Z et al (2019) Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Women’s Health 11:287–299CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Renavikar PS, Chen J, Lele SM (2023) Epithelial ovarian carcinoma–a perspective. Taylor & Francis. J Histotech 46:55–56CrossRef Renavikar PS, Chen J, Lele SM (2023) Epithelial ovarian carcinoma–a perspective. Taylor & Francis. J Histotech 46:55–56CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McCluggage WG (2011) Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology 43(5):420–432CrossRefPubMed McCluggage WG (2011) Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology 43(5):420–432CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clinicians 68(6):394–424CrossRef Bray F et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clinicians 68(6):394–424CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clinicians 71(3):209–249CrossRef Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clinicians 71(3):209–249CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhou Z et al (2021) Disease burden and attributable risk factors of ovarian cancer from 1990 to 2017: findings from the global burden of disease study 2017. Front Public Health 9:619581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou Z et al (2021) Disease burden and attributable risk factors of ovarian cancer from 1990 to 2017: findings from the global burden of disease study 2017. Front Public Health 9:619581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Yang D et al (2021) Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer and the attributable risk factors in all 194 countries and territories during 2007–2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47(12):4389–4402CrossRefPubMed Yang D et al (2021) Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer and the attributable risk factors in all 194 countries and territories during 2007–2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47(12):4389–4402CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zhang S et al (2022) The global burden and associated factors of ovarian cancer in 1990–2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health 22(1):1455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang S et al (2022) The global burden and associated factors of ovarian cancer in 1990–2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health 22(1):1455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Kleppe M et al (2016) The impact of lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival: a nationwide cohort study of patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 66:83–90CrossRefPubMed Kleppe M et al (2016) The impact of lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival: a nationwide cohort study of patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 66:83–90CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Benedet J et al (2000) Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines for gynaecological cancers. Int J Gynecol Obstet 70:207–312CrossRef Benedet J et al (2000) Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines for gynaecological cancers. Int J Gynecol Obstet 70:207–312CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Prat J (2014) FIGO committee on gynecologic oncology staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 124(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed Prat J (2014) FIGO committee on gynecologic oncology staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 124(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Du Bois A et al (2010) Potential role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of three prospectively randomized phase III multicenter trials. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1733–1739CrossRefPubMed Du Bois A et al (2010) Potential role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of three prospectively randomized phase III multicenter trials. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1733–1739CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Trimbos JB (2011) Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer: standard of care or unnecessary risk. Curr Opin Oncol 23(5):507–511CrossRefPubMed Trimbos JB (2011) Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer: standard of care or unnecessary risk. Curr Opin Oncol 23(5):507–511CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ataseven B et al (2014) Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 135(3):435–440CrossRefPubMed Ataseven B et al (2014) Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 135(3):435–440CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Landrum LM et al (2013) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 130(1):12–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Landrum LM et al (2013) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 130(1):12–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Takei Y et al (2018) Impact of the number of removed lymph nodes on recurrence-free survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 23(5):930–935CrossRefPubMed Takei Y et al (2018) Impact of the number of removed lymph nodes on recurrence-free survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 23(5):930–935CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Braicu EI et al (2011) Role of histological type on surgical outcome and survival following radical primary tumour debulking of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers. Br J Cancer 105(12):1818–1824CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braicu EI et al (2011) Role of histological type on surgical outcome and survival following radical primary tumour debulking of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers. Br J Cancer 105(12):1818–1824CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
go back to reference Greenstein AJ et al (2008) Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc 112(6):1239–1246 Greenstein AJ et al (2008) Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc 112(6):1239–1246
25.
go back to reference Chen Y et al (2013) Combining the negative lymph nodes count with the ratio of positive and removed lymph nodes can better predict the postoperative survival in cervical cancer patients. Cancer Cell Int 13:1–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen Y et al (2013) Combining the negative lymph nodes count with the ratio of positive and removed lymph nodes can better predict the postoperative survival in cervical cancer patients. Cancer Cell Int 13:1–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Gülseren V et al (2020) Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 40(5):699–704CrossRefPubMed Gülseren V et al (2020) Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 40(5):699–704CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kim TH (2020) Impact of adherence to sedlis criteria for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in lymph node-negative cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 159:353CrossRef Kim TH (2020) Impact of adherence to sedlis criteria for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in lymph node-negative cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 159:353CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bahardoust M et al (2023) Effect of the number of negative lymph nodes removed on the survival and recurrence rate after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 23(1):246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bahardoust M et al (2023) Effect of the number of negative lymph nodes removed on the survival and recurrence rate after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 23(1):246CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Ercelep O, Ozcelik M, Gumus M (2019) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 43(2):151–159CrossRefPubMed Ercelep O, Ozcelik M, Gumus M (2019) Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 43(2):151–159CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang J et al (2018) Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: an analysis of 10 878 patients. Cancer Med 7(9):4315–4329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang J et al (2018) Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: an analysis of 10 878 patients. Cancer Med 7(9):4315–4329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Mahdi H et al (2011) The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 103(7):724–729CrossRefPubMed Mahdi H et al (2011) The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 103(7):724–729CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of the Number of Negative Lymph Nodes Removed on the Survival and Recurrence Rate After Primary Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors
Elham Rahimpour
Behnaz Niroomand
Maryam Kalatehjari
Fatemeh Shahbakhti
Mansour Bahardoust
Babak Goodarzy
Fatemeh Majdolashrafi
Sara Ghorbanzade
Adnan Tizmaghz
Publication date
27-09-2024
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02077-8
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

  • Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now