Skip to main content
Top

07-12-2024 | Osteoporosis | Invited Review

Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment

Authors: Ayako Tominaga, Keiji Wada, Yoshiharu Kato, Ken Okazaki

Published in: Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody drug with potent bone formation-promoting and bone resorption–inhibiting properties. It enhances bone mineral density and has a novel effect in preventing fractures. However, there have been reports of non-responders to romosozumab.

Findings

If the least significant change is defined as 3%, only 2–12% of patients with spine osteoporosis are non-responders, and romosozumab is highly effective in this population. Low-type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) levels during the early treatment phase are associated with non-responders early in treatment. The researchers found a cutoff value of 50.3 μg/L of P1NP in the first month of treatment. In contrast, hip osteoporosis does not respond (54–57% of the time). Low P1NP levels at the start of treatment increase the risk of non-responders. The cutoff value for P1NP was reported as 53.7 μg/L at the beginning of treatment. However, failure to meet these cutoff values does not necessarily indicate that the patient is a non-responder and does not justify a change in drug administration.

Conclusions

In spine osteoporosis, romosozumab demonstrates high effectiveness, with approximately 2–12% of patients showing no response. However, in hip osteoporosis, approximately 54–57% do not respond to the treatment with romosozumab.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lems WF, Raterman HG (2017) Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 9:299–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lems WF, Raterman HG (2017) Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 9:299–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, Saika A, Yoshida H, Suzuki T, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T (2009) Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab 27:620–628CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, Saika A, Yoshida H, Suzuki T, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T (2009) Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab 27:620–628CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sing CW, Lin TC, Bartholomew S, Bell JS, Bennett C et al (2023) Global epidemiology of hip fractures: secular trends in incidence rate, post-fracture treatment, and all-cause mortality. J Bone Miner Res 38:1064–1075CrossRefPubMed Sing CW, Lin TC, Bartholomew S, Bell JS, Bennett C et al (2023) Global epidemiology of hip fractures: secular trends in incidence rate, post-fracture treatment, and all-cause mortality. J Bone Miner Res 38:1064–1075CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yeh EJ, Gitlin M, Sorio F, McCloskey E (2023) Estimating the future clinical and economic benefits of improving osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among postmenopausal women across eight European countries. Arch Osteoporos 18:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeh EJ, Gitlin M, Sorio F, McCloskey E (2023) Estimating the future clinical and economic benefits of improving osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among postmenopausal women across eight European countries. Arch Osteoporos 18:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M, Metge C, Caetano P, Leslie WD (2011) Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int 22:2439–2448CrossRefPubMed Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M, Metge C, Caetano P, Leslie WD (2011) Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int 22:2439–2448CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Soen S, Usuba K, Crawford B, Adachi K (2021) Family caregiver burden of patients with osteoporotic fracture in Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 39:612–622CrossRefPubMed Soen S, Usuba K, Crawford B, Adachi K (2021) Family caregiver burden of patients with osteoporotic fracture in Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 39:612–622CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cosman F, Dempster DW (2021) Anabolic agents for postmenopausal osteoporosis: how do you choose? Curr Osteoporos Rep 19:189–205CrossRefPubMed Cosman F, Dempster DW (2021) Anabolic agents for postmenopausal osteoporosis: how do you choose? Curr Osteoporos Rep 19:189–205CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Davis S, Simpson E, Hamilton J, James MM-S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Goka E, Gittoes N, Selby P (2020) Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 24:1–314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davis S, Simpson E, Hamilton J, James MM-S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Goka E, Gittoes N, Selby P (2020) Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 24:1–314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Reid IR, Billington EO (2022) Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet 399:1080–1092CrossRefPubMed Reid IR, Billington EO (2022) Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet 399:1080–1092CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bouxsein ML, Eastell R, Lui L-Y, Wu LA, De Papp AE, Grauer A, Marin F, Cauley JA, Bauer DC, Black DM (2019) Change in bone density and reduction in fracture risk: a meta-regression of published trials. J Bone Miner Res 34:632–642CrossRefPubMed Bouxsein ML, Eastell R, Lui L-Y, Wu LA, De Papp AE, Grauer A, Marin F, Cauley JA, Bauer DC, Black DM (2019) Change in bone density and reduction in fracture risk: a meta-regression of published trials. J Bone Miner Res 34:632–642CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, Hofbauer LC, Lau E, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Zerbini CAF, Milmont CE, Chen L, Maddox J, Meisner PD, Libanati C, Grauer A (2016) Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 375:1532–1543CrossRefPubMed Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, Hofbauer LC, Lau E, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Zerbini CAF, Milmont CE, Chen L, Maddox J, Meisner PD, Libanati C, Grauer A (2016) Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 375:1532–1543CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Balemans W (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet 10:537–543CrossRefPubMed Balemans W (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet 10:537–543CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fixen C, Tunoa J (2021) Romosozumab: a review of efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular risk. Curr Osteoporos Rep 19:15–22CrossRefPubMed Fixen C, Tunoa J (2021) Romosozumab: a review of efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular risk. Curr Osteoporos Rep 19:15–22CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Singh S, Dutta S, Khasbage S, Kumar T, Sachin J, Sharma J, Varthya SB (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 33:1–12CrossRefPubMed Singh S, Dutta S, Khasbage S, Kumar T, Sachin J, Sharma J, Varthya SB (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 33:1–12CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fogelman I, Blake GM (2000) Different approaches to bone densitometry. J Nucl Med 41:2015–2025PubMed Fogelman I, Blake GM (2000) Different approaches to bone densitometry. J Nucl Med 41:2015–2025PubMed
18.
go back to reference Gallagher JC, Rosen CJ, Chen P, Misurski DA, Marcus R (2006) Response rate of bone mineral density to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone 39:1268–1275CrossRefPubMed Gallagher JC, Rosen CJ, Chen P, Misurski DA, Marcus R (2006) Response rate of bone mineral density to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone 39:1268–1275CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Miller PD, Hattersley G, Lau E, Fitzpatrick LA, Harris AG, Williams GC, Hu MY, Riis BJ, Russo L, Christiansen C (2019) Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial. Bone 120:137–140CrossRefPubMed Miller PD, Hattersley G, Lau E, Fitzpatrick LA, Harris AG, Williams GC, Hu MY, Riis BJ, Russo L, Christiansen C (2019) Bone mineral density response rates are greater in patients treated with abaloparatide compared with those treated with placebo or teriparatide: Results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial. Bone 120:137–140CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Kono T, Sudo A (2016) A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment. Osteoporos Int 27:2845–2853CrossRefPubMed Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Kono T, Sudo A (2016) A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment. Osteoporos Int 27:2845–2853CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Ferrari S, Khan A, Lane NE, Lippuner K, Matsumoto T, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A (2018) FRAME study: the foundation effect of building bone with 1 year of romosozumab leads to continued lower fracture risk after transition to denosumab. J Bone Miner Res 33:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Ferrari S, Khan A, Lane NE, Lippuner K, Matsumoto T, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Grauer A (2018) FRAME study: the foundation effect of building bone with 1 year of romosozumab leads to continued lower fracture risk after transition to denosumab. J Bone Miner Res 33:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tominaga A, Wada K, Okazaki K, Nishi H, Terayama Y, Shimamoto S, Kodama Y, Kato Y (2023) Nonresponder considerations for romosozumab treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 113:157–165CrossRefPubMed Tominaga A, Wada K, Okazaki K, Nishi H, Terayama Y, Shimamoto S, Kodama Y, Kato Y (2023) Nonresponder considerations for romosozumab treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 113:157–165CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cosman F, Kendler DL, Langdahl BL, Leder BZ, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Rojeski M, McDermott M, Oates MK, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Ferrari S (2022) Romosozumab and antiresorptive treatment: the importance of treatment sequence. Osteoporos Int 33:1243–1256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cosman F, Kendler DL, Langdahl BL, Leder BZ, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Rojeski M, McDermott M, Oates MK, Milmont CE, Libanati C, Ferrari S (2022) Romosozumab and antiresorptive treatment: the importance of treatment sequence. Osteoporos Int 33:1243–1256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
go back to reference Takada J, Dinavahi R, Miyauchi A, Hamaya E, Hirama T, Libanati C, Nakamura Y, Milmont CE, Grauer A (2020) Relationship between P1NP, a biochemical marker of bone turnover, and bone mineral density in patients transitioned from alendronate to romosozumab or teriparatide: a post hoc analysis of the STRUCTURE trial. J Bone Miner Metab 38:310–315CrossRefPubMed Takada J, Dinavahi R, Miyauchi A, Hamaya E, Hirama T, Libanati C, Nakamura Y, Milmont CE, Grauer A (2020) Relationship between P1NP, a biochemical marker of bone turnover, and bone mineral density in patients transitioned from alendronate to romosozumab or teriparatide: a post hoc analysis of the STRUCTURE trial. J Bone Miner Metab 38:310–315CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kashii M, Kamatani T, Nagayama Y, Miyama A, Tsuboi H, Ebina K (2023) Baseline serum PINP level is associated with the increase in hip bone mineral density seen with romosozumab treatment in previously untreated women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 34:563–572CrossRefPubMed Kashii M, Kamatani T, Nagayama Y, Miyama A, Tsuboi H, Ebina K (2023) Baseline serum PINP level is associated with the increase in hip bone mineral density seen with romosozumab treatment in previously untreated women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 34:563–572CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Chen P, Satterwhite JH, Licata AA, Lewiecki EM, Sipos AA, Misurski DM, Wagman RB (2005) Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 20:962–970CrossRefPubMed Chen P, Satterwhite JH, Licata AA, Lewiecki EM, Sipos AA, Misurski DM, Wagman RB (2005) Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation predict BMD response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 20:962–970CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Matsumine A, Nakamura T, Kono T, Sudo A (2014) An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide. Osteoporos Int 25:377–384CrossRefPubMed Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Matsumine A, Nakamura T, Kono T, Sudo A (2014) An algorithm using the early changes in PINP to predict the future BMD response for patients treated with daily teriparatide. Osteoporos Int 25:377–384CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Coin A, Sergi G, Benincà P, Lupoli L, Cinti G, Ferrara L, Benedetti G, Tomasi G, Pisent C, Enzi G (2001) Bone mineral density and body composition in underweight and normal elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int 11:1043–1050CrossRef Coin A, Sergi G, Benincà P, Lupoli L, Cinti G, Ferrara L, Benedetti G, Tomasi G, Pisent C, Enzi G (2001) Bone mineral density and body composition in underweight and normal elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int 11:1043–1050CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Delgado-Calle J, Sato AY, Bellido T (2017) Role and mechanism of action of sclerostin in bone. Bone 96:29–37CrossRefPubMed Delgado-Calle J, Sato AY, Bellido T (2017) Role and mechanism of action of sclerostin in bone. Bone 96:29–37CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tsujimoto M, Chen P, Miyauchi A, Sowa H, Krege JH (2011) PINP as an aid for monitoring patients treated with teriparatide. Bone 48:798–803CrossRefPubMed Tsujimoto M, Chen P, Miyauchi A, Sowa H, Krege JH (2011) PINP as an aid for monitoring patients treated with teriparatide. Bone 48:798–803CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment
Authors
Ayako Tominaga
Keiji Wada
Yoshiharu Kato
Ken Okazaki
Publication date
07-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Print ISSN: 0914-8779
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5604
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01570-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on advances in lupus

  • Live
  • Webinar | 27-05-2025 | 18:00 (CEST)

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a severe autoimmune disease that can cause damage to almost every system of the body. Join this session to learn more about novel biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring and familiarise yourself with current and emerging targeted therapies.

Join us live: Tuesday 27th May, 18:00-19:15 (CEST)

Prof. Edward Vital
Prof. Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Register now
Webinar

Elevate your expertise in aplastic anemia (Link opens in a new window)

Transform the way you care for your patients with aplastic anemia with our 3-module series using real-world case studies and expert insights. Discover why early diagnosis matters, explore the benefits and risks of current treatments, and develop tailored approaches for complex cases. 

Supported by:
  • Pfizer
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more