Skip to main content
Top

16-05-2024 | Osteoporosis | Scientific Article

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using routine clinical care computed tomography brain studies

Authors: Dee Zhen Lim, Milo Macbain, Marcus Kok, Ghanda Wiggins, Hussein Abbouchie, Sze Ting Lee, Eddie Lau, Ruth P. Lim, Cherie Chiang, Numan Kutaiba

Published in: Skeletal Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Osteoporosis and falls are both prevalent in the elderly, and CT brain (CTB) is frequently performed post head-strike. We aim to validate the relationship between frontal bone density (Hounsfield unit) from routine CTB and bone mineral density from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Materials and methods

Patients who had a non-contrast CTB followed by a DEXA scan in the subsequent year were included in this multi-center retrospective study. The relationship between frontal bone density on CT and femoral neck T-score on DEXA was examined using ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results

Three hundred twenty-six patients (205 females and 121 males) were analyzed. ANOVA analysis showed that frontal bone density was lower in patients with DEXA-defined osteoporosis (p < 0.001), while Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated a fair correlation with femoral neck T-score (r = 0.3, p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, these were true in females but not in males. On ROC analysis, frontal bone density weakly predicted osteoporosis (AUC 0.6, 95% CI 0.5–0.7) with no optimal threshold identified. HU < 610 was highly specific (87.5%) but poorly sensitive (18.9%). HU > 1200 in females had a strong negative predictive value for osteoporosis (92.6%, 95% CI 87.1–98.1%).

Conclusion

Frontal bone density from routine CTB is significantly different between females with and without osteoporosis, but not between males. However, frontal bone density was a weak predictor for DEXA-defined osteoporosis. Further research is required to determine the role of CTB in opportunistic osteoporosis screening.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Rashki Kemmak A, Rezapour A, Jahangiri R, Nikjoo S, Farabi H, Soleimanpour S. Economic burden of osteoporosis in the world: a systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:154.PubMedPubMedCentral Rashki Kemmak A, Rezapour A, Jahangiri R, Nikjoo S, Farabi H, Soleimanpour S. Economic burden of osteoporosis in the world: a systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:154.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. 2013;8(1):136. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. 2013;8(1):136. Available from: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11657-013-0136-1.
7.
go back to reference Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1532–43.CrossRefPubMed Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1532–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Gausden EB, Nwachukwu BU, Schreiber JJ, Lorich DG, Lane JM. Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis screening and bone density assessment: a qualitative systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1580–90.CrossRefPubMed Gausden EB, Nwachukwu BU, Schreiber JJ, Lorich DG, Lane JM. Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis screening and bone density assessment: a qualitative systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1580–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lenchik L, Weaver AA, Ward RJ, Boone JM, Boutin RD. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography: state of the art and argument for paradigm shift. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018;20:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lenchik L, Weaver AA, Ward RJ, Boone JM, Boutin RD. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography: state of the art and argument for paradigm shift. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018;20:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Wright CM, Bulsara MK, Norman R, Moorin RE. Increase in computed tomography in Australia driven mainly by practice change: a decomposition analysis. Health Policy (New York). 2017;121:823–9.CrossRef Wright CM, Bulsara MK, Norman R, Moorin RE. Increase in computed tomography in Australia driven mainly by practice change: a decomposition analysis. Health Policy (New York). 2017;121:823–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abbouchie H, Raju N, Lamanna A, Chiang C, Kutaiba N. Screening for osteoporosis using L1 vertebral density on abdominal CT in an Australian population. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:e540–8.CrossRefPubMed Abbouchie H, Raju N, Lamanna A, Chiang C, Kutaiba N. Screening for osteoporosis using L1 vertebral density on abdominal CT in an Australian population. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:e540–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:588–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:588–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Li YL, Wong KH, Law MW, Fang BX, Lau VW, Vardhanabuti VV, et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis in abdominal computed tomography for Chinese population. Arch Osteoporos. 2018;13:76.CrossRefPubMed Li YL, Wong KH, Law MW, Fang BX, Lau VW, Vardhanabuti VV, et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis in abdominal computed tomography for Chinese population. Arch Osteoporos. 2018;13:76.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Hwang JY. Multidetector computed tomography in patients with femoral neck fracture for assessing osteoporosis: comparison with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021;82:173–81.PubMed Lee HJ, Hwang JY. Multidetector computed tomography in patients with femoral neck fracture for assessing osteoporosis: comparison with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021;82:173–81.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Schreiber JJ, Gausden EB, Anderson PA, Carlson MG, Weiland AJ. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening - gleaning additional information from diagnostic wrist CT scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1095–100.CrossRefPubMed Schreiber JJ, Gausden EB, Anderson PA, Carlson MG, Weiland AJ. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening - gleaning additional information from diagnostic wrist CT scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1095–100.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pervaiz K, Cabezas A, Downes K, Santoni BG, Frankle MA. Osteoporosis and shoulder osteoarthritis: incidence, risk factors, and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:e1-8.CrossRefPubMed Pervaiz K, Cabezas A, Downes K, Santoni BG, Frankle MA. Osteoporosis and shoulder osteoarthritis: incidence, risk factors, and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:e1-8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Na MK, Won YD, Kim CH, Kim JM, Cheong JH, Ryu JI, et al. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening via the measurement of frontal skull Hounsfield units derived from brain computed tomography images. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Na MK, Won YD, Kim CH, Kim JM, Cheong JH, Ryu JI, et al. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening via the measurement of frontal skull Hounsfield units derived from brain computed tomography images. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
go back to reference Watts NB, Leslie WD, Foldes AJ, Miller PD. 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference: task force on normative databases. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16:472–81.CrossRefPubMed Watts NB, Leslie WD, Foldes AJ, Miller PD. 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference: task force on normative databases. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16:472–81.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Amin MFM, Zakaria WMW, Yahya N. Correlation between Hounsfield unit derived from head, thorax, abdomen, spine and pelvis CT and t-scores from DXA. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:2525–35.CrossRefPubMed Amin MFM, Zakaria WMW, Yahya N. Correlation between Hounsfield unit derived from head, thorax, abdomen, spine and pelvis CT and t-scores from DXA. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:2525–35.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kutleša Z, Ordulj I, Perić I, Jerković K, Poljak D, Gavrilović V, et al. Opportunistic measures of bone mineral density at multiple skeletal sites during whole-body CT in polytrauma patients. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34:775–82.CrossRefPubMed Kutleša Z, Ordulj I, Perić I, Jerković K, Poljak D, Gavrilović V, et al. Opportunistic measures of bone mineral density at multiple skeletal sites during whole-body CT in polytrauma patients. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34:775–82.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lillie EM, Urban JE, Lynch SK, Weaver AA, Stitzel JD. Evaluation of skull cortical thickness changes with age and sex from computed tomography scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:299–307.CrossRefPubMed Lillie EM, Urban JE, Lynch SK, Weaver AA, Stitzel JD. Evaluation of skull cortical thickness changes with age and sex from computed tomography scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:299–307.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Gharibi B, Ghuman MS, Cama G, Rawlinson SCF, Grigoriadis AE, Hughes FJ. Site-specific differences in osteoblast phenotype, mechanical loading response and estrogen receptor-related gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol [Internet]. 2018;477:140–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29928929/. Gharibi B, Ghuman MS, Cama G, Rawlinson SCF, Grigoriadis AE, Hughes FJ. Site-specific differences in osteoblast phenotype, mechanical loading response and estrogen receptor-related gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol [Internet]. 2018;477:140–7. Available from: https://​pubmed.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​29928929/​.
32.
go back to reference Rawlinson SC, McKay IJ, Ghuman M, Wellmann C, Ryan P, Prajaneh S, et al. Adult rat bones maintain distinct regionalized expression of markers associated with their development. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rawlinson SC, McKay IJ, Ghuman M, Wellmann C, Ryan P, Prajaneh S, et al. Adult rat bones maintain distinct regionalized expression of markers associated with their development. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Ramchand SK, Seeman E. The influence of cortical porosity on the strength of bone during growth and advancing age. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16:561–72.CrossRefPubMed Ramchand SK, Seeman E. The influence of cortical porosity on the strength of bone during growth and advancing age. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16:561–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using routine clinical care computed tomography brain studies
Authors
Dee Zhen Lim
Milo Macbain
Marcus Kok
Ghanda Wiggins
Hussein Abbouchie
Sze Ting Lee
Eddie Lau
Ruth P. Lim
Cherie Chiang
Numan Kutaiba
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04703-6