Skip to main content
Top

04-01-2025 | Oral Cancer | Original Article

Quality of Life and Nutritional Outcomes with PEG Feeding in Locally Advanced Oral Cancer: An Institutional Experience

Authors: Surjeet Dwivedi, Sanjay Kumar, Surendra Kumar, Angshuman Dutta, Sabita Dwivedi, Lakshmi Geeta Nair

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery

Login to get access

Abstract

Locally advanced oral carcinoma requires extensive surgical intervention, leading to significant postoperative nutritional challenges. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) feeding has emerged as a preferred method over nasogastric (NG) feeding, providing consistent nutritional support that aids recovery by reducing complications and enhancing quality of life. This prospective cohort study followed 50 patients with locally advanced oral carcinoma requiring postoperative PEG feeding. Patients were assessed over a 6-month period for nutritional status (BMI, serum albumin), inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), and psychosocial well-being (HADS). Complication rates and patient satisfaction were also recorded. After 6 months, mean BMI increased from 18.5 ± 2.5 kg/m² to 19.0 ± 2.7 kg/m², while serum albumin rose from 2.8 ± 0.5 g/dL to 3.4 ± 0.5 g/dL, indicating nutritional recovery. CRP and ESR levels declined from 25 ± 5 mg/L to 15 ± 3 mg/L and 30 ± 7 mm/hr to 22 ± 5 mm/hr, respectively, reflecting reduced inflammation. Quality of life scores improved, with global health rising from 50 ± 10 to 70 ± 15, and anxiety and depression scores decreasing from 12 ± 4 and 14 ± 4 to 8 ± 3 and 9 ± 3. The complication rate was low (30%), and patient satisfaction increased from 7.5 ± 1.2 to 8.5 ± 1.1. PEG feeding significantly improves nutritional recovery, reduces inflammation, and enhances quality of life in postoperative oral carcinoma patients, supporting its role as a standard of care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mekhail TM, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Larto MA, Saxton JP, Lavertu P (2001) Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube? Cancer. Interdisciplinary Int J Am Cancer Soc 91(9):1785–1790 Mekhail TM, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Larto MA, Saxton JP, Lavertu P (2001) Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube? Cancer. Interdisciplinary Int J Am Cancer Soc 91(9):1785–1790
2.
go back to reference Chen AM, Li BQ, Lau DH, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Stuart K, Newman K, Purdy JA, Vijayakumar S (2010) Evaluating the role of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys 78(4):1026–1032CrossRef Chen AM, Li BQ, Lau DH, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Stuart K, Newman K, Purdy JA, Vijayakumar S (2010) Evaluating the role of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys 78(4):1026–1032CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yang W, McNutt TR, Dudley SA, Kumar R, Starmer HM, Gourin CG, Moore JA, Evans K, Allen M, Agrawal N, Richmon JD (2016) Predictive factors for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and use in head and neck patients following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment: concordance, discrepancies, and the role of gabapentin. Dysphagia 31:206–213CrossRefPubMed Yang W, McNutt TR, Dudley SA, Kumar R, Starmer HM, Gourin CG, Moore JA, Evans K, Allen M, Agrawal N, Richmon JD (2016) Predictive factors for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and use in head and neck patients following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment: concordance, discrepancies, and the role of gabapentin. Dysphagia 31:206–213CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chang J, Chen L, Kuan KH, Huang JY, Lin C, Fang K (2007) Tube feeding in Head and Neck Cancer patients receiving concomitant Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys 69(3):S430–S431CrossRef Chang J, Chen L, Kuan KH, Huang JY, Lin C, Fang K (2007) Tube feeding in Head and Neck Cancer patients receiving concomitant Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys 69(3):S430–S431CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Salas S, Baumstarck-Barrau K, Alfonsi M, Digue L, Bagarry D, Feham N, Bensadoun RJ, Pignon T, Loundon A, Deville JL, Zanaret M (2009) Impact of the prophylactic gastrostomy for unresectable squamous cell head and neck carcinomas treated with radio-chemotherapy on quality of life: prospective randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 93(3):503–509CrossRefPubMed Salas S, Baumstarck-Barrau K, Alfonsi M, Digue L, Bagarry D, Feham N, Bensadoun RJ, Pignon T, Loundon A, Deville JL, Zanaret M (2009) Impact of the prophylactic gastrostomy for unresectable squamous cell head and neck carcinomas treated with radio-chemotherapy on quality of life: prospective randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 93(3):503–509CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Langius JA, Zandbergen MC, Eerenstein SE, van Tulder MW, Leemans CR, Kramer MH, Weijs PJ (2013) Effect of nutritional interventions on nutritional status, quality of life and mortality in patients with head and neck cancer receiving (chemo) radiotherapy: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 32(5):671–678CrossRefPubMed Langius JA, Zandbergen MC, Eerenstein SE, van Tulder MW, Leemans CR, Kramer MH, Weijs PJ (2013) Effect of nutritional interventions on nutritional status, quality of life and mortality in patients with head and neck cancer receiving (chemo) radiotherapy: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 32(5):671–678CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ehrsson YT, Sundberg K, Laurell G, Langius-Eklöf A (2015) Head and neck cancer patients’ perceptions of quality of life and how it is affected by the disease and enteral tube feeding during treatment. Ups J Med Sci 120(4):280–289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehrsson YT, Sundberg K, Laurell G, Langius-Eklöf A (2015) Head and neck cancer patients’ perceptions of quality of life and how it is affected by the disease and enteral tube feeding during treatment. Ups J Med Sci 120(4):280–289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Ling Y, Zhang L, Wan H (2016 May) Comparative effects of different enteral feeding methods in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis. OncoTargets Therapy 18:2897–2909 Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Ling Y, Zhang L, Wan H (2016 May) Comparative effects of different enteral feeding methods in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy: a network meta-analysis. OncoTargets Therapy 18:2897–2909
9.
go back to reference Sartori S, Trevisani L, Tassinari D, Gilli G, Nielsen I, Maestri A, Abbasciano V (1996) Cost analysis of long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients in an Italian health district. Support Care Cancer 4:21–26CrossRefPubMed Sartori S, Trevisani L, Tassinari D, Gilli G, Nielsen I, Maestri A, Abbasciano V (1996) Cost analysis of long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients in an Italian health district. Support Care Cancer 4:21–26CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Keung EZ, Liu X, Nuzhad A, Rabinowits G, Patel V (2012) In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):777–786CrossRefPubMed Keung EZ, Liu X, Nuzhad A, Rabinowits G, Patel V (2012) In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy. J Am Coll Surg 215(6):777–786CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality of Life and Nutritional Outcomes with PEG Feeding in Locally Advanced Oral Cancer: An Institutional Experience
Authors
Surjeet Dwivedi
Sanjay Kumar
Surendra Kumar
Angshuman Dutta
Sabita Dwivedi
Lakshmi Geeta Nair
Publication date
04-01-2025
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-05313-3